If ISIS could install ANY person in history as its president, who would that be?

Question: if The Islamic State could, hypothetically, install ANY person in history as it's president, who would they likely install? Churchill? Lincoln? Who? The person would have to be cool with crucifixions, torture, beheadings, torture, rape of captives, FGM, torture, treating women as 1/2 a man, killing gays, and torture, so that would narrow the list down a bit (that might eliminate Gandhi, for example.)

Personally, I'm leaning towards Mohammad, but maybe I'm wrong.
What about you?

 

Genghis Khan.

 

Good choice, but I think that reading the Qur'an/hadith it's pretty obvious that MOHAMMAD more accurately reflects their values - beheadings, torture, killing gays, giving women only half as much inheritance, requiring two women (but only one man) for testimony in a trial, etc. So I'm still thinking that the most barbaric group in the last 100 years in the world would identify with MOHAMMAD more than any person in history.
I'm thinking that the NAME of the group just might give away the answer, but hey, I could be wrong.

 

Mohammed was not a proven warrior with an unblemished record of victory nor did he lob the heads of his defeated at his enemies. Mohammed was a p###y for all intents and purposes and I have no doubt that ISIS would serve him up to Khan as their first offering.

 

You do know ghengis khan beat the living hell out of the Muslims right? He was not down with their beliefs lol.


Obvious someone will answer Obama, but he doesn't have the spine, he just apologizes for them.

No, the real president they would ask for would have to be someone like Mohammed or OBL. Or maybe Cindy Sheehan.

 

Obama would be a good choice. Look at how much ground radical Muslims have gained since Obama has been in office.

 

Khan beat the hell out of everyone, that is why ISIS would pick him if they could. The question was not who would lead them but who ISIS could pick if they had a choice. Charlemagne would be a strong second choice.

 

He's more concerned about attacking the GOP than attacking ISIS, it appears.

 

In that case, why isn't Hitler part of this discussion? Look at what he did with a very small country, he had them kicking the worlds ass. Could you imagine what he could do with the following of ISIS and every other Muslim radical across the world?

 

Only one of these he considers to be an enemy. That's why.

 

Hitler was an idiot and lost the war for Germany.

 

It's almost as if Obama was raised a Muslim, say with a Muslim father, and attending an Islamic school in his formative years, in say, oh, I don't know, the largest Islamic nation in world history. Almost.

 

Genghis Khan told the Islam’s that their gods sent him to punish them. He killed more Muslims than any other leader in history for sure. I don’t see ISIS picking him. I think they’d pick their current leader, The Obama.

 

You are mistaken. Mohammed did behead his captives, notably during the invasion of Banu Qurayza, where 800-900 captives were so treated.

And he also burned people alive.

 

Well, he will be looking for a job shortly, maybe......

 

Hitler was lucky at the beginning of the war. Britain and France were not ready for war, he was. Then his generals came up with a new tactic, blitzkrieg. But in the end the corporal in him caught up. He was a political leader that inspired, not a good tactician, strategist or general.

And he probably had the number one military in the world at the beginning.

 

Look at the damage he caused and his brainwashing skills are amazing. He took on the world and almost won, but yes he made mistakes.

 

Wait, hold on there. Are you saying he beheaded CAPTIVES? CAPTIVES? If that was true, then why would Obama say "the future does not belong to those who slander" this guy? It would seem that if he beheaded CAPTIVES then the future WOULD BELONG to those who slander Mohammad.

 

The question was who would be the best pick, not who realistically would lead them. The only person to match Khan was Alexander the Great, on the battlefield.

 

He is a very qualified individual - I'm sure he'll have no trouble whatsoever getting a job again as a community organizer.

 

I would look for a candidate that says the muslim call to prayer is the most beautiful sound he has ever heard.

 

You obviously refer to Bin Laden, or Al-Baghdadi, or Ayman al Zawahiri.

 

That's all he really needed was inspiration. He had 6 million Jews alone slaughtered without hesitation. Imagine the damage he could do with an army that is spread across the globe already lol. We would be in a world of hurt.

Remember, ISIS and others like them are simply motivated by words to go kill themselves for their beliefs. Hitlers motivational and brainwashing skills would take them to the next level.

 

Then Mohammad sounds like the PERFECT candidate to lead them - to lead a state named after the political belief system that he himself founded (The Islamic State.)
The Islamic State reflects the values of it's belief system's founder.

 

None of them are strong leaders though.

You would have to go back to Pasha to find a strong Muslim leader.