Insanity

There is ZERO EVIDENCE that children raised in nontraditional marriages far any worse than those in traditional marriages.

 

Utterly WRONG to blame that problem on LBGT marriages!

The above screed refers to UNWANTED children that primarily occur because of an ABSENCE of contraception and abortion facilities in traditional marriages.

It is utterly DISINGENUOUS to impose that FAILURE upon the LBGT community.

 

Sorry but they already played the weepy, weepy, please don't hurt us, card. Society responded in favor. Now they sue, harass, threaten and ruin the businesses and lives of those who simply want nothing to do with them. Not to mention perverting the marriage covenant and staging immoral parades. Like I said, "My my Grandma, what big teeth you have".

 

It makes the world better because the kid will rebel against this nonsense haha

 

Freedom of choice / freedom of association is the right to do whatever you want with *consenting adults*.

In case you haven't noticed, this issue involves nonconsenting children.

 

Sorry that people doing things that impact you in no way bother you so. Must be pretty difficult. I’m sure you’ll get by, somehow.

 

Or they might grow up in a loving home and be a kinder, more accepting adult as a result. I’d say that would make the world a better place.

 

Do children consent to life in any family situation? I don’t think so.

 

Encouraging mental illness is not kind.

 

news flash... every child ever born , throughout history, didn't/couldn't consent to being born...

what a proposterous idea it is to suggest we somehow wait for the unborn's consent to be born... will these fetus' also have knowledge of forethought so that they could give informed consent, or is a 'kick' to the womb at a specific time the secret code for consent

 

No, but being understanding of people going through something difficult is. I get that this is likely an uncomfortable topic for you, but that doesn’t mean your negative opinion of the matter is accurate.

 

I am a conservative leaning independent, and I approve this message.

 

Why emulate or approximate tradition if it is such a poor and questionable environment for family and children? Does one leave and not go?

 

Or they might live out their childhood, carrying a burden of unnecessary shame. While their "parents" get to live in a fantasy.

 

When did being wholesome and making the world a better place become a standard?

Some on here supporting that idea better watch what they say. Trump is neither of those things and he enjoys a wealth of support.

So I'm thinking this is just another selective standard applied only in situations where a pre-existing bias already exists.

 

Why is it any business of yours how people live their lives?

 

Oh goodness, you mean they could possibly be picked on and bullied? Well that changes everything. Clearly children should only be raised by heterosexual, two parent household, with parents of the same race and religious beliefs. Those kids grow up perfect and never face adversity.

 

Irrelevant.

You folks claim that LGBT adoption / artificial procreation is a matter of personal freedom. I debunked that claim. How straight procreation works has no relevance to the issue whatsoever.

Total strawman.

Inejun said nothing about being bullied. Child abuse victims feel shame even if nobody knows that they were abused. Is strawmen all you people have?

Oh, so you shouldn't be bothered by things as long as they don't impact you personally? Okay, by that logic there's nothing wrong with murder, since you're not impacted by it.

 

No impact? Like I said, they sue, harass, threaten and ruin the businesses and lives of those who simply want nothing to do with them. They seduce, corrupt, and kill peoples loved ones with AIDS. Not to mention perverting the marriage covenant and staging immoral parades. Is that not impact? Do you think that coddling their decay, nesting their poison and carrying them to hell in a hand basket is a service?

 

How straight procreation works is absolutely relevant to this situation. Does a child consent to being born into a household that exists below the poverty line? No they don’t, but they face adversity for it all the same. What about being born into a family with a workaholic father that’s never around? No again. Adversity may follow. If the parents intend to bring the child into the world in good faith, your opinion of the matter means Jack.

You clearly don’t know what a straw man is if you believe my post was one. You’re implying that a child raised in a no traditional family setting are abused as a rule. You’ll have to demonstrate that to be true, or it’s just you opinion, which means... say it with me... Jack.

A ridiculous claim. It is easily demonstrated that not punishing murder would cause an increase in murder rates which directly impacts my safety. Demonstrate how children raised in non traditional families impacts you. You can’t, all you have is your opinion, and we all know what that’s worth.

 

Businesses should probably not violate public accommodation laws if they don’t want to face legal consequences.
AIDS is not a uniquely homosexual issue as the situation in Africa clearly demonstrates.
Demonstrate how SSM impacts anyone’s marriages but their own. Thanks.
“Immoral parades” is nothing more than an opinion, which holds no value to anyone but yourself. Do you hear Jews crying about Christmas parades?
Prove that hell exists. Otherwise I believe letting people live their lives the way they see fit to not only be a service, but to be the only moral thing to do.

 

Disingenuous? The LBGT community is no less dysfunctional than drug addicts or alcoholics. All of these things are detrimental to the well being of children. Adults may do as they please but that does not include the certain destruction of a child. A child in utero has a right to life no less than one who has been born, both have a right to a life that is wholesome and nurtured. The problem with our society is that "adults" have become so narcissistic and hedonistic that they have no sense of responsibility for others.The problem is too often they are children raising children.These two people are about as self destructive as it gets and this child is just a passing amusement, a toy, and it will be showered with attention until the novelty wears off, what then? As I said already, an adult's pursuit of happiness, whatever that may be, does not include throw away children. Children's rights trumps adults. I can only imagine what sort of homes these two came from, nobody is born that way.

 

Cool opinion. Demonstrate that any of it is fact.

 

“The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published an extensive study proving the importance of biological fathers in the ‘healthy development of children.In addition, ‘the most careful, rigorous, and methodologically sound study ever conducted‘ on the issue of homosexual parenting found numerous and significant differences between children raised by biological parents and children of homosexuals, with the outcomes for children of homosexuals rated ‘suboptimal’ in almost every category.

 

Because perverse conduct sets a terrible example for others, especially the young.