Actually the more interesting question is why it doesn't bother you. The second biggest reason is that you don't expect to experience any negative repercussions, and the biggest reason is the sense of superiority you get from the idea that it bothers him. Doesn't matter, obviously, seeing every word of it, possibly excepting the last sentence, is true. I can hardly wait to see you cite any such research which bases any of its findings on one on one interviews with those kids conducted by people who have demonstrated their ability to accurately assess a child's psychological welfare. Wrong question. The right question, of course, is what societal acceptance of such glaring insanity portends for the future of that society. Criminy, do you really think we don't know weasel words when we see them? I'm surprised you're surprised. Like Hell you are. Sure it is, to those who haven't got a clue as to what freedom is.
What EXACTLY is "poor and questionable" about children being raised by same sex or transgender parents? There are plenty of dysfunctional straight marriages that create "poor and questionable environments" for children but you are not bent out of shape about those. Why discriminate against LBGT families when you have ZERO EVIDENCE that it will be a "poor and questionable environment"?
What a massive load of unsubstantiated bovine excrement! There have been a handful of instances were businesses run by BIGOTS have ILLEGALLY refused services to paying customers and been sued. There is ZERO EVIDENCE that the LBGT community is "seducing. corrupting and killing" anyone. Marriage is a LEGAL CONTRACT between two CONSENTING adults that has ZERO IMPACT on the "holy matrimony covenant" that is a RELIGIOUS concept. Straight people engage is the exact same "immoral" parades. You have a right to your misinformed OPINION but not to your own alternative factoids.
You are entitled to your misinformed OPINION in these matters but since NONE of it can be FACTUALLY SUBSTANTIATED by CREDIBLE sources it carries no weight whatsoever.
Media Bias/Fact Check is a web site that rates factual accuracy and political bias in news media. The site is run by founder and editor Dave Van Zandt. The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an armchair media analyst. Van Zandt describes himself as someone with more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher on media bias and its role in political influence. Armchair media analyst? Nice try.
Of course not. You just made a claim about the existence of perverse conduct being viewed by children then relied on deflections when asked for examples. That should have been more than enough, by golly!
Adoption, sperm donor, surrogacy, and foster parents. That’s just what I could come up with off the top of my head. Could you not think of those yourself?