Is Hillary done?

Of course not. Which is quite comical on your part. You call it a scandal, and yet you already say it won't stick. Lol! If you new for a fact it was a scandal like you claim, then it would certainly stick. Which means you know more than anyone else, just how full of (*)(*)(*)(*) you are.

 

All I did was post the directive... not trying to fool anyone. Your sarcasm is colorful, but not very well worded. Anyone with reasonable reading comprehension skills will get it.

 

On the CBS evening news, in 2007 Hillary was railing about government people using personal e-mail to do government business. She remains a two faced liar.

 

That seems a bit disjointed reply. Consider the long list of Clinton scandals, and none of them did stick, except for the sex scandal, and I doubt Hillary is going to have one of those on her own. Were they scandals? Yes. Was the media interested in following up? No. And that will be the case this time. We'll never get a clear answer on this because by the time she is hip deep in the election, this will be "old news."

 

Yes perhaps but I see a clear Elizabeth Warren support especially here in MA over Clinton. It could be Hillary has a replacement that doesn't have as much baggage. I previously thought Clinton could beat a puppy to death with a bag of kittens and leftists would still support her but that line may be wavering a bit. We will have to wait and see, but my guess now is it will still be Hillary as the democrat nominee. Honestly.....remember when we thought she would be bad for the country? Wow has Obama put that in perspective or WHAT? Ill take some Clinton Whitewater stories over Obama starting a thermonuclear war any day!

 

Well, there is still a long way to go but I posted a Hillary/Elizabeth poll here and Hillary won so far.

http://www.politicalforum.com/opinion-polls/398030-who-would-you-vote-hillary-elizebeth.html

 

Yes thanks, fascinating. Its currently 5-4, here in MA its about 4-5 in Warrens favor after talking to my known liberal friends. I cant get a read on why Warren is all of a sudden someone worthy of Presidency on an relative equivalency with Clinton. Id be interested in the age groups supporting each of these two.

 

I would have thought my poll would have favored Warren. That is what I thought when I posted it. I was surprised at the support of Hillary but as time goes on, anything can happen to thwart a campaign. Sometimes little things like a yelp that Howard Dean made.

 

Honestly, that guy got roasted like no other. I mean no one even cared about his ideals, that yeeeah did him in all on its own. I think we are seeing something similar with Hillary, its just not very clear why dems are dropping her. It seems they are keeping her at arms length just in case but it also looks like they are going to let her fall on the sword the second they get a read on warrens popularity beating hillarys across the nation.

 

I thought it kind of odd that a 'yeeehaw' could torpedo someone but then the electorate (and the media) can be fickle.

 

Yes they can, it appeared the media did not want him in the running (AT ALL) because even the leftist media allowed repeated roasting of him. At some point I almost felt sorry for the guy.

 

Probably right. It's not like she'd be the first criminal to occupy a public office. Far from it, in fact.

Nothing they do seems to matter much anymore. We could have a known axe murderer in office and it still wouldn't matter.

 

I think he is a dick but I agree and felt it was as if it were preordained that he would be shut out by the media. I think that reduces the debate even if I don't agree with his politics.

 

agreed.

 

It depends on who the GOP candidate is, pssst, I know this will drive you crazier but I am one of those swing voters. I have no Party other than the United States of America and vote for the best candidate in my opinion that is presented. Don't mess it up and I will be happy to vote against Hillary.

 

Hillary's new campaign.

 

Hope they get the dates, because that is all that is needed.

 

Name the last time verifiable misconduct hurt a front running Democrat. Back in the 1970's maybe?

 

There is a 99% chance that Hilary will be President next election. And there's a 1% margin of error on that.

The Democrats long term issue is finding enough firsts in the office. Black, woman, gay? Atheist? What can come following those? Trinidadian?

 

No, of course not. The American public has zero memory and the email thing is hardly anything anyone cares about. The taking of millions? You'll have to show some proof of that.

 

I think she is cooked.
Obviously not with voters who could care less about integrity and transparency, but I believe there are just too many Hillary scandals for the majority of independents look the other way.

The House committee investigating Benghazi sent a subpoena to Hillary's lawyer today requesting all emails she had in her personal account as secretary of state that relate to Libya!

 

No one's denying it and the two headed one (Koch brothers) will probably spend a billion dollars to remind people of it.

 

She's set herself up here because if it's a private email address, she can never prove she's provided all emails. She did provide about 55,000 from her tenure as SOS but it was several months after the request was made, which makes it likely that her people went through them all with a fine-toothed comb. There is not much she can do to clear her name when her decision coincides with all that gray money.

 

Is Hillary done?

I hope not. I salivate at the thought of a debate between Hillary and Jeb.

On the other hand, who needs her? Nobody. Well...maybe Huma.

 

Not sure about that, if she didn't use an official email account, the government has the right to her personal account, that whole account belongs to the American people.

And with the recent stonewalling the feds have done with Lois Lerners emails, public opinion will not stand for another.