oh and one more thing that you magic bullet theorists cant get around as well that I forgot to mention-this is just for the benefit for the lurkers on here that dont go into it seeing only what they want to see like the magic bulle theorists do,is even in the zapruder film is hows jackie crawling out onto the back of the limo retreiving brain matter grabbing it and then getting back into the limo. she later handed it to a doctor in the operating room.hee hee. its amazing how the magic bullet theorists NEVER get tired of getting their asses handed to them on a platter.hee hee.
she handed brains to the doctor? prove it. what, did she hope the doctor could re-attach his missing brains???? lolol!!!!!!
She did. Jackie had hoped that maybe he could be saved. Nobody has to prove it. Dr. McClelland talks about it.
Watch this video of Dr. McClelland and listen to him tell all about it. [video=youtube;gHfWG1S6SZM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHfWG1S6SZM[/video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHfWG1S6SZM
Kennedy was shot from behind. The autopsy proves this beyond question. The individuals you name have been in conspiracy theory circles for years telling their tales. Unfortunately none of them were in a position to examine the wound and determinre where the shot came from. The autopsy accomplished this task. The key word in your statement is TYPICALLY. Yes typically exit wunds are larger than entrance wounds but this is not an absolute. Especially when the wound is on the side of the skull which bursts outward like an eggshell
Right!.. sure Soupnazi. Kennedy was shot from behind by a magic bullet. Uh huh. The TV said so. I'm not buying it. - - - Updated - - - These guys don't do any of their own homework, yet they know Oswald killed Kennedy because Walter Cronkite told them so and he was the most trusted liar of the 20th century.
It was a normal bullet not magical. It is in fact movies and Tv whaich have told YOU that it was magical. It was normal and ordinary like millions of other bullets. Yes he was shot from behind and above that is proven fact. - - - Updated - - - Actually yes I have done far more homework on this issue than you have. The evidence overwhelmingly proves oswald did it. Not Cronkite. Unfortunatly in comparison no credible evidence of any kind supports a conspiracy. Try reading some books rather than watching a few videos.
Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ
Yes Plausible denial was written by Mark Lane and is devoid of any evidence. The man who killed Kennedy is even more devoid. A publisher once estimated that over 2000 books have been written about conspiracy theories in the death of JFK. None of them produce evidence they engage only in circular logic, supposition and speculation. Try addressing some of the overwhelking evidence against Oswald which you have never considered.
Overwhelking evidence? One fact that can not be ignored. Oswald did not get his day in court. Oswald was denied his fifth amendment rights and his murder was the first live murder ever shown on TV. I find that fact interesting in itself.
Yes. Oswald remained silent ever since Jack Ruby ended his life, on live TV, at age 24. Oswald did not get his day in court.
He was never denied his fifth amendment rights. Yes overwhelming evidence which you steadfastly ignore in favor of a few videos which provide NO evidence but only intrigue. I'm not sure where you get the claim that it was the first live murder ever shown on TV. I'll concede it is possible but not certian. Yes the death of Oswald fed many conspiracy theories but in the end it proves nothing and no evidence has ever been found supporting such theories. BTW even Ruby went to his grave denying that there was a conspiracy. He had years to come clean while sitting in prison but always maintained his guilt in acting alone. - - - Updated - - - Many individuals do not get their day in court. For example sometimes people are killed resisting arrest. The evidence still proves he acted alone.
I would encourage conspiracy theorists to loook at this vid but word of caution, this will not sit well with you as you will be convined that the magic bullet theory is hogwash. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSBXW1-VGmM
You Mike are the biggest conspiracy theorist of all. You actually believe the lone gunman theory ... the craziest of them all. LOL. Your magic bullet theory is crazy. - - - Updated - - - Yeah he did. And he denied any involvement. Then he was shot down in cold blood on live TV.
Oswald was shot down on live TV. The camera men were ready and focused. The first man ever to be killed on live TV. It was great. The TV crew loved it. It sold millions. If only the Zapruder film had been let out 12 years earlier then President Kennedy would have been the first ever cold blooded killing on TV.
Sorry but as a conspiracy theory believer it is YOU with the magic bullet theory. As has been pointed out before the fact is that the magic bullet theory is a lie contrived by conspiracy theorists. The government never described such a bullet or theory. The fact that Oswald was the lone shooter is not a theory any more than the earth being shaped basically round is a theory. It is fact backed up by evidence which your theories are lacking. Oswald claimed to be a Patsy sure and denied his guilt. And apprently you think that this is evidence of innocence. I should probably warn you that if you are ever arrested the authorities will not care if and how you deny your guilt. Most criminals do claim to be framed, or set up, or a patsy, or just plain innocence. The point is not what Oswald said but that he had reasonable opportuniy to say it. His fifth amendment rights were never violated ( AS YOU CLAIMED ) and he did not present any alibi ( WHICH YOU CLAIMED HE HAD ). He sat in jail and attempted to phone famous attorneys while his family came to visit him. In the mean time the Dallas police did an amazing job of assemblimg damning evidence against him all of which you ignore.
How much BS can one put into a post. Your lone gunman nutjob theory has no basis in fact. The bullet that killed JFK came from the front of the car. All the doctors at Parkland Hospital thought that and testified under oath to that fact. It is simply unintelligent to claim otherwise.
No once again they testified to no such thing. They described a wound. You are assuming it was caused by a frontal shot but that is simply assumption with no basis in fact. You need to also understand what they were doing. Were they examining his head to determine bullet path and point or entry / exit? No Were they attempting to determine cause of death? No They were trying to save JFK's life which is what doctors in EVERY emergency room do. A casual glance at a wound while desperately working to save the patients life does not trumpt a valid autopsy which IS meant to determine cause of death and direction of wounds etc. The autopsy along with endless piles of evidence proves that he was shot from behind. Those are facts these doctors state only unsupported opinion
How many times will you deny the truth and claim that the internet is truth? You state clearly that Fitzgerald testified to a large gaping wound. This is not proof of a shot from the front. He further testified that it " COULD " have been caused from a shot from the front. Obviously you have trouble with reading comprehension since the word COULD is not definitive. It could have been is NOT a certianty. Fitzgerald was not part of the autopsy team and therefore his opinion of what could have been is nothing more than opinion which is proven wrong by evidence and facts. Don't you get it? Many have opinions but the facts prove many of them WRONG. Observations and opinions do not override the expert autopsy examination of Kennedy's body which proves the shot came from behind and above. No matter how much you wish they did. The internet is not a truth machine it is just a machine and so far you have struck out badly in proving me wrong. Keep trying you may eventually catch me making a mistake.
