FALSE!!! Dr. Clark made no such claim!!! its very disrepectful for you to claim he said something that we all know he did NOT.
My mistake Fitzgerald = Dr Clark. Wow you finally proved me wrong although it was merely some confusion over a name not a disnificant fact. Dr. Clark si the one who you admnit stated an unsupported opinion which of course is proven wrong by the facts.
Yeah I did. I proved you wrong within hours after you came into this thread. And it is a much bigger mistake than you want to admit. If you had any idea what you were talking about you would not have made that mistake. The debunkers are getting desperate. - - - Updated - - - We can see the desperation of the debunkers. Dr. Clark clearly thought that the large gaping wound in the back of Kennedy's head may have been an exit wound from the entrance wound of the neck. Remember folks, at the time Dr. Clark did not have any video or knowledge of how the shooting happened. Dr. Clark did not witness the shooting. Whoever wants to read what Dr. Clark said at the press conference immediately after he signed JFK's death certificate here is a transcript of that conference. Parkland Hospital Press Conference Four months later Dr. Clark testified, under oath, the same as he saw it. Testimony Of Dr. William Kemp Clark Ronstar screaming into the screen FALSE!!! does not change what Dr. Clark told us. The debunkers are getting desperate. The truth is coming out anyway.
Sorry little one but minor mistakes such as confusing a name are not proof I am wrong and you have failed MISERABLY to offer a shred of evidence proving me wrong You ignoe the facts which i have given you BECAUSE you are incapable of proving them wrong. One more time and read it slowly so you can grasp the truth. Dr. Clark stated an opinion based on casual observation he did not state any fact or evidence which disputes the autopsy. You consistently ignore the very words in your posts such as COULD have or MAY have. You quote people like Dr Clark stating these opinion andthen claim he stated fact. By his own admission he did NOT state fact which is why he qualified it as an opinion. Now that I have admitted confusing his name why not grow up and admit he offers no proof that I am wrong.
You are getting desperate. That much is clear. I offered links so that anyone who wants to read it for themselves can do it. Dr. Clark had no duty to determine the direction of the bullet. He offered his opinion in a press conference immediately after he wrote the death certificate and he reiterated his opinion four months later in testimony under sworn oath. And all the Parkland Medical team who examined JFK were consistent years later. Large gaping head wound in the back of his head. All shooters know that exit wounds are larger than entrance wounds.
No it is clearly you who is getting desperate. They stated opinion based on acsual observation none of them even turned the body over to closely examine the wound in the BACK of the head. Opinion is NOT fact or evidence. No one claimed Dr. Clark had such a duty he merely stated OPINION which does not contradict proven fact. This is what you cinsistently ignore and spin to avoid. Everyone assumes that exit wounds are AWAYS larger than entrance wounds. As you pointed out earlier exit wounds are TYPICALLY the larger of the two but TYPICALLY does not mean ALWAYS. You are now back pedaling trying to claim that exit wounds are always larger. You were right the first time they typically are but NOT always. This all proves desperation whereas I have been consistent and correct
Were you at Parkland Hospital on November 22, 1963? All those professionals in the post above were there that day in the Hospital in the same room as Kennedy. Dr. Clark examined JFK's large gaping head wound and testified to it under oath. I think I will trust Dr. Clark's testimony over some guy posting on the Internet who believes the Warren Commission got it right and 19 guys with boxcutters attacked the Pentagon on 9/11.
No I was not there and neither were you. Once again you spin to ignore fact. DR. Clark did NOT roll the body over to closely examine the head wound. He stated this himself. None of these doctors were examinging the body for the tracks or specific nature of the wounds they were OPERATING on him in an effort to save his life and that is ALL they did. This constitutes a cursory and casual observation not an autopsy. The autopsy CLEARLY proves them wrong and you ignore THOSE doctors in favor of those who had no detailed knowledge of the wound. I have clearly stated that these doctors at Parkland stated opinion which is fine they are allowed to state opinion but it is ONLY opinion based on ZERO supporting evidence. The autopsy is fact based on strong and scientific evidence proving their opinion false. You know nothing about were the Warren Commission report is right or wrong you have no idea what is contained in the WC report because you never bothered to read it. You believe only what you have been told and ordered to think rather than examining both sides of the argument and judging the evidence presented by both. I have read many conspiracy theory books concerning JFK Books by Mark Lane, Jim Marrs, William Garrison, FletcherProuty, David Lifton, Penn Jones, Mary Farrell and of course I have seen Oliver Stone's work of cinematic fiction. ALl told I have over 50 such books and a dozen films. The problem is they ALL fall apart when one looks at the other side of the debate and realize that all of the above authors and film makers outright lie about many details and that they fail to offer any evidence. BTW no one ever claimed 19 guys attacked the Pentagon. The 19 men with boxcutters hijacked 4 aircraft and attacked 3 seperate targets.
Dr. Clark testimony under oath, Amazing. Simply amazing. You do know that the Pentagon is the headquarters of the most powerful military industrial complex the world has ever known and that the airspace above it is the most protected airspace in the world, right?
Dr. Clark testified under oath that he didn't know how many injuries JFK had or from which angle they came from. he also testified under Oath that he felt the rear head injury was NOT an exit wound. - - - Updated - - - says who? who said it was the most protected airspace on Earth? what protection did this airspace have on 9-11? where do Truthers get such baseless claims????
EVerything Dr. Clark stated under oath supports what I have been saying and contradicts YOU. The Doctor did NOT roll the body over and he did not do anything more than take a casual look at a wound which was NOT enough to determine all of the facts. He admitted all of this which you ignore. The Pentagon is the HQ \yes but the airspace is not as well protected as you claim and never has been.
