Joe owes the public a response about the family’s business.

WSJ discredited bobulinski

 

Where?

 

At their website and internet post.

 

How do we know you're not leaving something important out?

I tend not to cite these sources because they often have to be read in incognito mode.

 

Sorry, couldn't find it.....but in my search, found a lot more confirming my 1st story.

 

Ah, so if we knew as much as Trump's lawyers and accountants, we could cut our tax bills to $750!

Trump is a crook.

 

He wouldn't be under oath.

He did the right thing in ignoring Trump.

 

Propaganda Alert!

Do you believe what Trump is pumping out? I sure as hell don't.

 

Sorry.
Try real news sources or even WSJ itself.

The Wall Street Journal newsroom has found that texts and emails recently given to the publication by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, provide no evidence that Joe ever used his political standing as a former vice president to aid Hunter's business dealings in China.
https://www.newsweek.com/wsj-newsro...s-after-reviewing-bobulinskis-records-1541553

 

How many mansions does Joe own now on his senator/VP salary? I bet he could match the Obamas mansion for mansion.

 

Point me at the evidence that Joe Biden actually sold influence, what KIND of influence you mean (e.g. it's pretty common for people to make money off their names after leaving office) and at quotes of his in which he denies knowing about the deal with the Chinese company.

Why would they do that? It would give the story life. It's politically smart to ignore it. I haven't seen anything reported on the contents that shows Joe Biden committed a crime. Similarly, I haven't seen anything from Bobulinski that suggests Joe Biden committed a crime. Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, and the New York times examined the ostensibly incriminating emails and text messages and none of them found evidence that Joe Biden took any money at all. But what if he DID? What's the crime? Joe Biden was a private citizen.

I don't have a high opinion of Hunter Biden, but I haven't seen anything that suggests he did anything criminal either. I'd rather people didn't make money off their familial connections, but if that becomes a crime the prisons will overflow.

 

Simply put, liberals have been claiming without proof that Trump is a Russian agent, and in spite of all evidence to the contrary.

Yet the same people proclaim BIDEN to be innocent of taking money from Russia, Ukraine and China when there is overwhelming evidence he has, and in spite of the fact that the campaign cannot refute the charges and make no denials of the evidence.

 

Asked and answered.

 

The FBI said it's real. They also have a copy. The campaign hasn't denied it's real.

 

Cool, let's look into that $73 million Trump made while were at it. As well as the influence and access the Saudis might have had or are having being at Trump hotels. Talk about influence and access.

The bigger issues are on what Biden is going to do to get us to being a nation supplying renewable energy, and an actual plan on healthcare. Voting for Trump is voting for terminal cancer for the nation, I wish I were being melodramatic but I'm not. This election is that serious.

 

I dunno about this. The Right, which does its homework and so KNOWS just how corrupt Joe is, doesn't need to hear anything that Joe might have to say on the subject and Biden supporters don't WANT to know that Joe is corrupt. So the first group doesn't need Joe to speak and the second group doesn't want Joe to speak.

 

If the tax laws allow you to do so, you are a complete fool to not take advantage of it. You can donate far beyond what is required to show how virtuous you are, Langley Man but I doubt you would do so. Actually, Trump "pre-paid" a lot of his taxes, deferred some.....but most likely, you wouldn't understand any of that. So don't "pretend" that you do!

 

I don't see WSJ or THE NYT as judge and jury. Guess we'll have to wait.

 

The WSJ could not confirm any actual role by Joe Biden. From what I've seen so far, not even Bobulinski claims he has evidence that Joe Biden took said role or the 10% equity. Microwaving the nothingburger won't stop it from being a nothingburger.

 

LOL. You could not find the WSJ discrediting bubolinski, I did it for you. And they are credible.

 

I have seen no evidence of Joe Biden taking money from a foreign country. Maybe I missed it, but I have asked several people on this forum, and haven't gotten a single thing. All I've gotten are assertions like yours, and frankly, it seems exactly the sort of hypocrisy you believe some liberals have exhibited: they treat their suspicions of Biden as facts, and interpret data to fit it. Meanwhile, they dismiss all suspicions of Trump on the basis that it hadn't been proven. That's them. Let's see if you can do better.

If you feel suspicions are adequate for one, then it is hypocritical to say proof is needed for the other. You complained nothing had been proven about Trump, so that implies you can prove your suspicions about Biden (assuming you aren't a hypocrite). Provide the proof.

 

Let's see how well YOU have done your homework. What crime is Biden accused of?

 

Propaganda Alert!

The "birther" claim for the 2020 election.

 

And you want to put that guy in charge of fixing this...

Not the point. See the graph above. Trump is a life member of the swamp.

I go back to my question: Is there something wrong when I make more in a day in the market than some full-time workers make on the job in a year?

I taught accounting. You?

Uh huh.

 

You didn't hear about the text message from CRACKHEAD HUNTER BIDEN to his daughter where he says he had to give half his salary to "Pop"?

There is plenty of other evidence. All you have to do is some research. Play devils advocate against your own position. Instead of trying to prove yourself right, try to prove yourself wrong.

Here's a start for you: