Justice Dept. IG report released on FBI's `Insubordinate' in Clinton Probe, Inspector General Finds

The way you all keep reading right wing blogs, and going out on these very weak limbs leave me little choice

 

Everyone knows The Clintons are crooked.

“Earlier this month, Carl Bernstein—half of the reporting duo that helped expose the Watergate scandal in 1972—went on CNN to volunteer an observation about Hillary Clinton’s failure to release the transcripts of her paid speaking gigs at Wall Street firms. “Now, you’ve got a situation with these transcripts,” he said, “a little like Richard Nixon and his tapes that he stonewalled and wouldn’t release.”

“Whoa, whoa,” interrupted CNN anchor Poppy Harlow. “I mean, your investigation brought down a presidency. You know scandal.”
MOTHER JONES, Woodward and Bernstein Can’t Stop Comparing Hillary Clinton to Richard Nixon, BY PEMA LEVY, FEB. 15, 2016.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...-bernstein-cant-stop-comparing-clinton-nixon/

They have never been "cleared". They just operate beyond the reach of the law. Most people wonder how they get away with it.

 

Possibility of 5 indictments according to NPR today.

 

Oh, then go ahead.

 

So you blame the incompetence of the trump admin?

 

He found a horribly botched investigation, violation of rules, procedures, possible crimes.... it is not important if he found bias or political motivation, these violations and crimes warrant a special counsel to investigate these matters further and punish perpetrators regardless of motivation or bias.

 

But plenty against Trump. IG released this.

“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” the lawyer, Lisa Page, wrote to Strzok.

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded in the August 2016 exchange.

 

Yah when investigators see the evidence they develop a bias. You think a cop who watches you shoot someone isn’t going to assume you’re guilty?

 

Ok and if one isn’t appointed I can blame trump right?

 

Why is Trump smiling? Seems to me the FBI isn’t as corrupt as he wants us to think.

 

Strzok can easily respond to that. He was clearly talking about voters

 

This is over, gang, a nothing burger, folks.

“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,”

 

Yes, for choosing spineless idiot Sessions as the AG.

 

Gosh it’s almost like maybe Sessions knows you’re wrong....

 

The IG wasn’t investigating Hillary, it was investigating the DOJ. It is the special prosecutor that is investigating Clinton.

 

500 pages documenting OBAMA FBI's violations and possible crimes to bleachbit Hillary of her crimes is nothingburger because the rogues showed no political motivation? Really?

 

I feel like ...This one is more accurate in terms of RW and Investigations

 

Also they sure did get Trump by not revealing he was ALSO under investigation and then come out right before election with the hillary stuff again....They were really trying to get after Trump lol

 

Comey’s Draft Statement

Comey’s initial draft statement, which he shared with FBI senior leadership on May 2, criticized Clinton’s handling of classified information as “grossly negligent,”but concluded that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring a case based on the facts developed in the Midyear investigation. Over the course of the next 2 months, Comey’s draft statement underwent various language changes, including the following:

• The description of Clinton’s handling of classified information was changed from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless;”

• A statement that the sheer volume of information classified as Secret supported an inference of gross negligence was removed and replaced with a statement that the classified information they discovered was “especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on servers not supported by full-time staff”;

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...-ig-report-on-hillary-clinton-email-case.html

Can anyone logically explain how this is not political bias for HRC.

Can anyone explain how HRC is not guilty of crimes here?

 

because it isn’t and she’s not. Thanks

“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,”

 

Keep parroting that.

That LIE is for the sheeple to parrot.

The OIG Report is absolutely full of political bias.

 

Yeah I really didn't expect anything to come of this. .it's how the government always handles corruption because they truly believe the masses are stupid and will buy whatever they sling our way.

Problem is, that was yesterday. These days many like myself have become too smart and educated to fall for that crap. So basically what we need is to get liberals on board as well. They need to stop flapping their jaws and repeatng rhetoric they'd just heard on CNN and instead grow some brain cells so they think for themselves.

 

This on page 420 of the OIG Report:

"We also asked FBI Attorney 1 what she understood FBI Attorney 2 to mean when he messaged, “Viva le resistance.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...-ig-report-on-hillary-clinton-email-case.html

How is FBI agents texting each other about "the resistance" NOT political bias?

The entire OIG Report is FULL of political bias.

 

Another corrupt criminal enterprise at work.

 

Clearly all he knows -- like any party loyal leftist is what Rachel Maddow of MSNBC tells him . . . to . . . know. No thinking required; and it shows.