Justice Dept. IG report released on FBI's `Insubordinate' in Clinton Probe, Inspector General Finds

On Page Xii of the IG report the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (DOJ-OIG) highlights numerous FBI officials who accepted bribes from multiple media outlets including: “tickets to sporting events”, “golf outings”, “drinks and meals” as well as exclusive invitations and admission to “nonpublic social events”.

 

That reply from Strzok was never included in the release from the FBI. The OIG recovered the text using their independent forensics. The FBI intentionally hid the Strzok reply.

 

So fire them. What do I care? Have I said there is nobody in the fbi who ever did anything wrong?

 

Where does the report say it was intentionally hidden?

 

This is over, gang, a nothing burger, folks.

“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,”

 

Right, 500 pages of the report documenting Obama FBI's corrupt and criminal efforts to let Hillary off the hook is nothingburger. Lol

dude, bias or not... rules were bent, FBI procedures and methods ignored, laws broken by corrupt elements of Obama's FBI to avoid prosecuting Hillary.

 

Duh, the FBI redacted it.

 

So the OIG didn’t use forensics to recover it? Make up your mind

 

Rep. Meadows tweeted: Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok reply: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” This Peter Strzok text about “stopping” Donald Trump was hidden from Congressional investigators. We never had it. Absolutely unreal.

 

Another Mueller Prosecutor Finally Removed Over Anti-Trump, "Viva La Resistance!" Texts

Here's some new stuff, starting with faulting McCabe and Peter Kadzik for not recusing themselves from these matters.

Voluntary recusal is always permissible with the approval of a supervisor or ethics official, which is what McCabe did on November 1. Had the FBI put in place a system for reviewing campaign donations to Dr. McCabe, which were public under Virginia law, the sizable donations from McAuliffe's PAC and the Virginia Democratic Party may have triggered prior consideration of the very appearance concerns raised in the October 23 WSJ article.

Finally, we also found that McCabe did not fully comply with this recusal in a few instances related to the Clinton Foundation investigation.

Former Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik:

In Chapter Fourteen, we found that Kadzik demonstrated poor judgment by failing to recuse himself from Clinton-related matters under federal ethics regulations prior to November 2, 2016. Kadzik did not recognize the appearance of a conflict that he created when he initiated an effort to obtain employment for his son with the Clinton campaign while participating in Department discussions and communications about Clinton-related matters. ​

Sure he didn't:

Kadzik also created an appearance of a conflict when he sent the Chairman of the Clinton Campaign and a longtime friend, John Podesta, the "Heads up" email that included the schedule for the release of former Secretary Clinton’s emails proposed to the court in a FOIA litigation without knowing whether the information had yet been filed and made public. His willingness to do so raised a reasonable question about his ability to act impartially on Clinton-related matters in connection with his official duties.
​

You think?

Additionally, although Department leadership determined that Kadzik should be recused from Clinton related matters upon learning of his "Heads up" email to Podesta, we found that Kadzik failed to strictly adhere to this recusal.
​

Such vile scum.

 

Yeah anyone at this point that's still defending HRC, Comey, Rosenstein, and the rest of the slime on the left is totally not credible at all. There is absolutely no way anyone can NOT see their criminality at this point therefore, either liberal followers are totally inept mentally or they themselves are corrupt and that's why they don't care.

 

One cannot be cleared unless they are first charged and Hillary was never charged.

She was however found to have committed acts that were against the law, although her supporters chose not to charge her with the crimes.

Its just like a police officer choosing not to give his buddy a speeding ticket even though the speed-gun found the buddy was indeed speeding.

 

Previously I postulated that a result of this report would be the affirmation that the firing of Comey was proper and justified and that appears to be the case.

The leftists and the anti-Trumpers have known from the very start that their Russia Russia Russia nonsense will never in a million years produce the impeachment or eviction of Trump.

Obstruction on the other hand can as it has been used before and thus the precedent is hard to deny.

The leftists are using Russia Russia Russia as the never-ending smoke screen that allows them to keep their minions in the dark each time Trump does something great (which is basically every week).

But obstruction was their ace in the hole, keyword was.

Despite the fact that the AG, the DAG, and the FBI's own review board found the firing of Comey to be 100% proper and justified, leftists were still going to go after Trump with obstruction over the firing.

Now that effort has had its knees knocked out.

 

Supporters? Who? Sessions and trump? Lol

 

Of course Mark Meadows would say that. I bet Jim Jordan was equally mortified.

 

And another Republican't conspiracy theory bites the dust.

 

Ok, its really simple.

The people who were tasked with determining if she broke the law (the FBI) concluded that she did.

The people who were tasked with determine if said law breaking was deserving of prosecution (the DOJ) declined to peruse the matter.

The issue at hand was the improper and corrupt nature in which the FBI and DOJ carried out those tasks.

 

Geez, /facepalm...no wonder lefties are so easy to control, they have no mind. Mindlessly believing whatever they're told.

Unfortunately only taught how to check the blue boxes and sign their name.....Duh!

 

And trumps DOJ continues to decline to prosecute.
Are you saying the fbi decides guilt or innocence? Otherwise you can’t say thy concluded she broke the law. That doesn’t bode well for trump lol

 

What I find glaringly obvious is that the top brass at FBI did the investigating in the Clinton investigation and the initial part of the Russia matter that we know of. The same folks. Why didn't the field offices do the jobs like they normally do?

 

The report clearly states his mishandling was press release 10 days before the investigation. If anything he's in trouble for helping Trump lol. The FBI had an investigation going into Trump but nothing was even mentioned yet Hillary was all over the news.

 

They have master investigators on their payrolls for which to blackmail. Blackmail is the best tool for controlling people. Just about everyone has something to hide. If nothing can be found, the person comes up dead by a very suspicious suicide or freak accident. Last known was Seth Rich who was a DNC staffer Bernie Sanders supporter that was murdered during the 2016 election who was found to be linked to Julian Assange at Wikl Leaks.

 

Fake news, the FBI didn't recommend prosecuting. If she broke the law they would have sent their recommendation to the DOJ but they had no reason to.

 

Talk about backfire the Trump cultists ended up just proving Comey was actually hurting Hillary in the election by discussing her investigation so close to the election but not a peep about the investigation of the opposing candidate.

 

One thing the report reveals is that obama emailed hillary using her private email address. He knew she had private email so when he made the claim he "found out about it in the news" he was telling a lie. That is no surprise because we all know obama is a habitual liar.