Justice Thomas is right

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by StillBlue, May 14, 2022.

  1. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you had bothered to read the cited article you would have read this:
    Most nominees have a judicial history that is easily accessed and evaluated to determine where the nominee stands on legal issues. Do you really buy the bs that we need hearings to make those determinations? How naive can you be?
     
  2. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Wattaya mean it's illegal for me to rob that bank? That was only settled law last year. I really NEED a Mercedes Benz this year ( My friends all drive Porsches, I must make amends).

    NONE of these guys would have gotten the position if they'd have said they were going to do this, or even hinted they might.

    "Are you in a cult that eats children?" Is not the kind of question that a prospective governess should look upon as part of a "dog and pony show"
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2022
  3. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Agreed. None of these martinets should have even been considered for the posts, but hearings under oath should have SOME effect. (and perjury should have some consequences.)
     
  4. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Gaslighting. Of course they lied. They did it on National tv and we all saw it, clear as day.

    You remind me of the Gahan Wilson cartoon where a guy is being shown killing someone on television. Hundreds of people are recoiling in shock as the murderer is pumping bullets into his victim and blood is fountaining everywhere. In the image a little arrow labeled "alleged assassin" has been imposed on the screen
     
  5. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,645
    Likes Received:
    17,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was the methods your party chose and are still choosing that is at issue.

    And, of course, the last of those, social justice is a vaguely meaningless term that smacks far more of the idea of vengeance than of justice.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2022
  6. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,645
    Likes Received:
    17,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except they didn't perjure them selves.
     
  7. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    23,120
    Likes Received:
    15,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quote the lies.
     
  8. Rampart

    Rampart Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2017
    Messages:
    7,880
    Likes Received:
    7,054
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "smacks of vengeance? why would anyone need vengeance ? i an sorry you feelz that way but you know what conservatives say about "feelings."

    "i can't prove there was election fraud, but i have a gut feeling." couy griffin (new mexico commissioner (r_)on refusal to certify election)
     
  9. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good luck proving any of them committed perjury. The Bill Clinton playbook has their backs.
     
  10. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "I consider Roe v Wade to be settled law" Then overturning it. HOW can you say that is NOT a lie?.

    Again, gaslighting, white is black and day in night. Anything is correct as long as it supports your hidebound religious belief from before the 1st century.
     
  11. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Settled law can be overturned. So where is the lie?
     
  12. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    23,120
    Likes Received:
    15,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok, there's no such thing as settled law.

    Now, show us where Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, or Barret said, under oath, "I will never vote to overturn Roe v. Wade". Without that, you ain't got nothin'.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2022
    garyd likes this.
  13. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So the term "settled law" AND the legal principle of stare decisis are basically meaningless. We can't rely upon law to be the same from day to day.
     
  14. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    23,120
    Likes Received:
    15,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's no such thing as "settled law" in our system of government. Jim Crow laws existed for nearly 100 years. We're they "settled law"? Of course not and thank goodness.
     
  15. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,645
    Likes Received:
    17,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What we saw them say has become standard cant for Supreme court Justices for the last forty years. "I cannot tell you in advance how I will decide any given case save to say that I will judge it basedm. .http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/justice-thomas-is-right.599683/page-3
    Okay define social justice.
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe and Overitall like this.
  16. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,645
    Likes Received:
    17,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently not Plessey vs Ferguson was overturned, so was Dred Scott, praise the Lord.
     
  17. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And according to the latest decision we should have them back since they weren't against anything in the Constitution at its time of composition.
     
  18. Cybred

    Cybred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2020
    Messages:
    20,806
    Likes Received:
    7,658
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then its not settled.
     

Share This Page