KKK-ENDORSED Laura Ingraham’s Anti-Immigrant Rant Was So Racist It Was Endorsed by Ex-KKK Leader Dav

There is no comparison.

 

Ah I see. You think population growth is zero sum.

 

In case you missed it, the GOP and their Koch funded "liberty" crusade are trying to undo those "discrimination" laws in their endless fight for economic freedom.

 

We don't need to.

Change has come about because folks have not accepted things the way they are.

So if a woman is being raped she should thank her rapist if he stops raping her. Smfh.

You haven't given us anything.

We wouldn't have any problems I'd we could get th we'd racist and bigots to take a hike. WTF have you done for this country that makes you superior enough to think you can tell folks to leave.

 

And corporate profits are higher than they ever have been in history.

 

You're saying that we shouldn't generalize the attributes or beliefs of one person to the broader group to which they belong simply because we disagree with them?

Hey, what's an LW Complex?

 

What demographic changes specifically? What's the problem with those changes?

 

That's a good thing...............to real Americans.

 

'

Wrong. Typical distortion in "broader group to which they belong." You shouldn't generalize Laura Ingraham's beliefs or group based on her having taken a smiling, laughing picture with David Duke... wait...erm... that was Obama and Farrakhan. NM.

That David Duke agrees with something Laura Ingraham said means nothing other than... that David Duke agrees with something Laura Ingraham said. That some white supremacist voted for or supported some candidate means... that some white supremacist voted for or supported some candidate. These things do not imply or create any relationship or similarity in the other direction. It really is that simple, flimsy semantic distortions and contortions notwithstanding.

The LW Complex is the a) gov-edu-union-contractor-grantee-trial lawyer-MSM Complex and their generationally dependent underclasses; as opposed to b) nondependent private sector taxpayers, the only two legitimate "identity groups" in U.S. politics. There is overlap in the groups, and some exceptions, but by and large those are the two "sides." Stick around this forum, you'll hear more than you care to about the Complex from me.

 

You're saying it is wrong to state that a former KKK leader endorsed Laura Ingraham's speech?

Well, as long as we can agree that there's an us and a them.

 

No, it's not wrong to state it. What's wrong is claiming or believing that that somehow tars Laura Ingraham with a white supremacist brush, but you know that already and are playing at obtuseness.

 

"Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people and they're changes that none of us ever voted for and most of us don't like.

"From Virginia to California, we see stark examples of how radically in some ways the country has changed. Now, much of this is related to both illegal and in some cases, legal immigration that, of course, progressives love."

When she refers to massive demographic changes, much of which is related to immigration, to what is she referring?

 

A KKK leader endorsed Hillary and donated $20,000 to her campaign in 2016, so that proves Hillary has a white hooded pantsuit in her closet.

 

Demographic changes due to legal and illegal immigration. How is that flying over your head?

What is "racist" about that? Are you saying she is racist against "brown" people?

 

And is clearly due to diversity in the corporate world.

 

So it IS possible for black people to be racist towards white people?

 

Diversity = profits?

You are quite the economist.

 

As diversity has increased so have record corporate profits.

 

If you'd like, sure.

 

She says 'much of this is related to' immigration. What is the rest of it due to? What demographic are we referring to?

I don't know what she's saying. You seem to understand it, explain it to me.

 

Is it possible for black folks to inflict racism on white folks, is that the question.

 

So? Show the relationship.

I could just as easily say I quit eating yogurt just as corporate profits soared and claim that caused it.

 

Ah, so when the original poster I was quoting decried corporate diversity their argument had no basis in reality?

 

She's referring to illegal immigration and excessive legal immigration. Advocating against those things has nothing to do with race.

For example, in my middling small county of 100,000 people, ~20,000 or so illegals were "injected" during the Obama Administration as part of crooked Democrat "turn red areas blue" schemes. Our infrastructure is breaking down, 1:6 of our school children can't -speak- let alone read English, areas that were middle class just ten years ago look like trailer park equivalents now, etc. So in a county that is 15% black, 15% legal Hispanic, and the rest white, 79% of those black, brown and white voters voted for Trump out of anger and backlash at the immense costs and problems that Democrat immigration related vote-buying schemes have created in our otherwise peaceful, middle class community. But I suppose that implies we are racist?

You need to pick another talking point, the "being against illegal and excessive legal immigration implies racism" one isn't doing your side any favors, is in fact counterproductive, especially when people in small cities like mine and 100s of other such cities across the country negatively affected by vote-buying illegal alien resettling schemes hear it.

 

Maybe

There is much to be said for the ‘40s and ‘50s

That was the time when children were not committing mass murder in the schools

When most black fathers lived in the home with the mother of their children as husband and wife

And when Americans did not have to press one for English or two for spanish when they used the telephone