Kyle Rittenhouse from bullied teen, to Kenosha Killer ?

Which could be why he was in the rally to begin with, lots of young sweaty guys to hit up on, or maybe do a little butt grabbing.

 

"The teen accused of shooting and killing two protesters and injuring a third on Tuesday in Kenosha, Wisconsin, opened fire after a protester threw a plastic bag at him, a criminal complaint obtained by The Daily Beast said."


https://www.insider.com/rittenhouse-killed-protester-after-they-threw-plastic-bag-prosecutors-2020-8

 

More false news.


Charging Docs, NY Times Analysis Support Kyle Rittenhouse’s Version Of Events
Kenosha, WI – Both The New York Times analysis of the Kenosha riot videos and the criminal complaint charging teen Kyle Rittenhouse with the shootings suggest the 17 year old may have been acting in self-defense when he pulled the trigger.

https://bluelivesmatter.blue/chargi...-support-kyle-rittenhouses-version-of-events/

 

Wrong it was a plastic bag it's in the report.....

From your own link ffs

"The video shows that as they cross the parking lot, Rosenbaum appears to throw an object at the defendant,” according to the criminal complaint. “The object does not hit the defendant and a second video shows, based on where the object landed, that it was a plastic bag.”

 

You can see the gunshot.

https://twitter.com/dylanbr72302072/status/1300184936763195392?s=21

 

Guy it was a plastic bag the dead man threw it was in his own link....

Another person shot a gun Rosebaum had no gun

 

Try understanding the entire story before trying to revise the facts to suit your false narrative.

 

He and others where attacking the kid and got shot, that's called self defense, too bad it doesn't fit your narrative but that too effing bad grow up and get over it.

 

He killed a man who threw a plastic bag at him ...and missed by the way

 

Yes I did watch and did you consider the fact that disarming him would have been a safety feature? I do not agree with you that he he was attacked I believe that they tried to disarm him. if they wanted to kill him someone in the crowd would have shot him.

 

Agree, and as I pointed out in the OP this is a sad case for that Kyle Kid and the family and friends of those who he killed. Even if they were pedophiles it was not up to him to be the self appointed executioner.

 

And yet, you know there's more to the story.

 

Why do you think someone can only be shot in self-defense is if they have a gun or some other weapon?

 

There you go, willfully misrepresenting the facts. Again.

 

You know that, all else being equal, if I have a gun, and you try to forcibly take that gun, I can shoot you in self-defense. Right?

 

What do you have to prove that Kyle was only there to "help". ?

 

Irrelevant to everything I said and in no way addresses the questions I asked.
Try again.

 

He was attacked by a mob.

 

That is not only self defense it is incredibly stupid on the part of the person trying to take the gun from you.

 

Why are you attacking me and and crapping on my honesty? Quote you "
That's perhaps to much honesty from you" Why are you unwilling or unable to debate the issues and not attack fellow members here? More quotes from you "
And at least be honest."

1- At the moment is time that he was being approached by what you call attackers the stats of one or even all of them being "convicted felon" has nothing to do with it.
2- I never "bashed the kid". I stated facts. He was bullied and he quit school and my theory is that had a lot to do with his actions.
3- I stated that his was a sad case and I stated that I hoped he would get help at some point
4- I do not know what your allegation about the media "lampooning" the kid has to do with me.
5- I have not proclaimed the kid a menace
6 I do not have to answer for anything because I did not bash the kid I posted known facts
7- I have nothing to do with some "leftists" that you like to mention so why are you mentioning "leftists" in response to my post.

You want honesty ? Maybe you can start by what you post as opinion about others her eon the forum and your tactics against other members here. Your quote " And at least be honest." Yes that is a good suggestion for everyone here. I will remind you of another quote from some anonymous person

" People is glass houses should not throw stones" ....

 

With the left, when the facts are against them they just resort to lying to support their antigun procriminal narrative.

They fall for it and assume everyone else will too.

 

Especially a firearm designed to, and the only purpose for which is to, kill as many people as possible.

 

Personally, I never submitted to bullies growing up. Knocked a few on their a$%. Nevertheless, I have a strong disdain for bullies. It as if I'm drawn to them. I too could find myself in a neighboring town like Kenosha where bullying is rampant. Not so much the big liberal cities like Portland. They've made their bed. Let them lie in their filth. Note that 90% of the destruction of Kenosha was done by out of state bullies. Blake was a bully himself. This is all a response to bullying.

 

Golly, that seems to have left a mark. An observation. You started a thread with the intent of what? To factually discuss the incident? To create a narrative about the incident, or To assert a narrative about the incident. From my perspective, your answer is C) to assert a narrative. You have, by your own creation, then asserted a narrative which you continue to assert, even in your response above. Let's dissect, shall we?

You assert the kid was bullied, facts asserted absent fact. You assert he quick school and your theory is this had a "lot to do with his actions". Ok, in what way? You seem to assume a great deal here in your opined narrative. But, factually, what can you actually prove then?

You assert his is a sad case, and you "hope he will get help". ok, from whom? And what about his life do you find sad? And what possibly do you assert is a cure for that, vis a vis, the "help" that you ascribe to him?

The facts are that Rittenhouse has been lampooned in the national media. We have every crazy in "merika" making fun of him as some dupe imbecilic follower of the current president. If you haven't written that specifically, then you weren't who that comment of mine was directed at. It was a general statement about my perception of how the national media have treated him, and the similarity of that treatment with another teen, Sandman, who was also treated in this way.

If the kid isn't a menace, why does he need help again? You assert that you've posted facts, but that observation seems personal, and frankly isn't supported by any additional evidence.

If you don't self identify as a leftist, I simply point to several conversations that lead one to believe you share common mores with them. I know we have found common ground in the past. But here, it baffles me that you have taken this approach end I am not exactly sure why. Do the actions of Rittenhouse offend your sensibilities? If so, how? Those are actually things that can be discussed. But as we can discuss them, the facts are still the facts, and the videos pretty well highlight what those facts are.

 

Well, a really good AR is accurate out to about 600yds, and with a lite round .223 if you're hunting antelope, it does make a good choice.