Let's get some stuff straight about Hunter and Joe.

There is an abundance of evidence. Deep state doesnt want him investigated or prosecuted. The first of it came December 2019 when FBI took the laptop. The last year of Trumps Presidency

 

An abundance of evidence with the lack of investigations..

 

I respect the United States Department of Justice's capacity to determine what is prosecutable rather than the opinion of hyper-partisans with no expertise in such matters.

 

There is no "determination " involved when Joe Biden's son has colluded with several Chinese spies for the Chinese government that Joe Biden the president is now representing the US with..... National Security is the determining factor... has been and should be now... no respectable DOJ would see it any other way...

 

You should report your privileged information concerning Citizen Biden to the proper authorities. They will, undoubtedly, ask you to identify your sources.

 

As the Trump investigations were exactly the same only there is ait more crap regarding The family Biden at least some of which could get Joe and accessory after the fact beef and possibly before as well. And let's face who the hell puts a convicted felon and known drug addict on their board of directors unless they figure to get a hell of a lot in return.

 

Dont need an investigation to read the contents of the laptop.

 

The laptop they already posses.

 

???? It is the department of Justice through the FBI that was trying to convince Twitter that the info on Hunter coming from the NY Post was hacked, when they knew in fact that it was not. I wouldnt trust much of anything coming from the "Justice" Department.

 

As previously noted, the legendary "laptop from hell" is of little value, since its continuity of evidence has been egregiously compromised, and its "discoverer" John Paul MacIsaac has acknowledged that, “I do know that there have been multiple attempts over the past year-and-a-half to insert questionable material into the laptop
as in, not physically, but passing off this misinformation or disinformation as coming from the laptop.”

Against, if you have privileged information concerning the much-ballyhooed laptop, you should share it with the Justice Department and/or politicians and prosecutors that are sympathetic to your partisan agenda, but you should recognize its dubious reliability in any prosecution.

If this citizen is alleged to have committed any crimes, that can only be determined after justifying his indictment, independent of any politically-driven fatwa targeting him.

 

Threat topic is Hunter and Joe. But you've brought up Christie, "Kush", and Donald Trump. Remember when you said this 3 minutes ago?

So which is your post? Deflection or derailment?

 

It's spot on government corruption. Still trying to get the Hunter in government connection, you keep trying though, what was Hunter's government job or title?

 

I think you need to start following your own advice.

 

Ironic post! What's Hunter's cabinet job title?

 

And like I previously said

 

Bagman for the Vice President of the US

 

Link to this government appointment? Thanks, I'll wait..

 

I'd have gone with the same position Donald John Trump Jr had when the left were trying to use him the same way the right is using Porno boy Huntard Biden

 

The chronic, parannoidal hyper-partisan fixation on the alleged content of the alleged laptop of an American citizen that has held, holds, or seeks no public office is a diversion from legitimate national priorities.

... The notion that a laptop delivered to the Post by Rudy Giuliani two weeks before the election and rejected by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Fox News and others should not have been treated skeptically — that is the dicier proposition. The hyper-ventilating about the supposed assault this represents on the First Amendment is risible. Twitter, a private company, was free to ignore the request. Even if Biden had been president at the time, there would be no violation of the First Amendment. Government officials not infrequently request that journalists refrain from publishing material, often about military secrets. Newspapers sometimes comply and sometimes not. It’s only a violation of the First Amendment if the government coerces the journalists.

Nor did Twitter’s temporary suspension of the Post’s account sway the election. As Cathy Young notes, 1) the ban lasted only about 36 hours; 2) the ban may have heightened interest in the story rather than suppressing it, and in any case, the story was available via a Google search; and 3) the whole narrative about Biden’s participation in Ukrainian corruption, the gravamen of the laptop story, is false...

Hunter Biden seems to be a mess. But there is nothing relevant to public policy or civic virtue here. Joe Biden is hardly the first president to have troubled family members. But Joe Biden didn’t hire Hunter at the White House, and if there is any evidence of the president using official influence on Hunter’s behalf, we haven’t seen it. The Department of Justice under Trump opened an investigation into Hunter Biden. President Biden has left it alone. It’s ongoing.

[https://chicago.suntimes.com/column...-rights-misplaced-obsession-with-hunter-biden]

​

If anyone who hates any Biden family members is ever to contrive something prosecutable, they may want to turn CyberNinjas to again set the record straight.

 

knowing hunter has drug issues, do people really believe joe would knowingly enter into some sort of "big" deal with him in any way?, no wonder the leftover repubs ran the candidates they did in the midterms , lol

 

That would be the computer shop owner who verified that "there have been multiple attempts over the past year-and-a-half to insert questionable material into the laptop"?

 

It defies credulity, of course, but desperate fatwas call for desperate fantasies.

 

I'm all FOR any investigation you want. But looks like the crime is "making a lot of money". I'm not sure prosecutors want to waste their time unless somebody can find a REAL crime.

I mean, I would LOVE to see everybody being investigated all the time "just in case". But maybe investigators are not so fond of the idea.

And besides, most judges don't like the idea of somebody being investigated "just in case". They tend to see it as a "fishing expedition" and sometimes leads them to side with the accused.

So it's much better if you have some ACTUAL crime to investigate them for. Considering what the judge will think, if they DO end up finding something.

 

John Paul was not talking about the original the FBI has hidden and we will never or see again...
The House committee can use what ever they want as evidence to start their investigation to look further into the connection between the president of the US and the Chinese spies and the Chinese government that was courting his son... your "chain of evidence", your DOJ does not apply with th House investigations...

The GOP House committees will be "looking for the truth".. wow.... where have we heard that before....

 

We don't need prosecutors, we don't need a trial, we don't need a court room at all

We just need a TV camera... Man this is gonna be good...

"fishing expedition" I truly can't believe you have said that after the last 6 years..