LINK Between Governor's PARTY, & COVID, Per Capita DEATH RATES

Not if people chose to take the vaccine when offered the chance.

 

Recall that it was at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health that Event 201 was held. That was the "simulation" that exactly paralleled the real events that happened months later.

The point is that Johns Hopkins is not guilt free in involvement in this plandemic. They facilitated deception in 2019, and could easily do it again.

But let's say all that data is true and accurate. As you said, the republicans are just as guilty of plundering the treasury as the democrats are, so what's the point?

 

No, Chris. If a virus stops spreading, it essentially dies out (in a given, large geographical area, as on a continent). So, since Canada seems well ahead of the U.S., in reducing its Covid-fire to embers, if we were to have ALL our states bring down their case numbers to a minimum (& a few very rural states never really had a blaze, to begin with), and Mexico either did the same, or we were actually able to stop any population influx through our long, southern border, then restrictions could be somewhat loosened. We will not be able to completely relax, though, until Covid has been put on ice EVERYWHERE in the world. (As Montegriffo mentioned, besides restricting unsafe behavior, immunization is a major tool for suppressing viral reproduction).

Part of the problem has been that, as soon as Covid is under control in anyone's immediate area, they loosen restrictions, until it arrives from a different area, where things had not been so settled. We live in a very mobile society. And, as long as Covid is reproducing (through humans), it has the ability to develop mutations that can be more problemmatic to deal with.

BTW, the word around here is that a NATIONAL MASK MANDATE is on the way.

 

I was under the impression that you did not believe the pandemic was a real thing. Here, you're willing to at least consider the possibility that it exists? Well, that's progress. So what is the involvement of the Dems & Repubs, which you are currently alleging?

Btw, I must admit, "plandemic," at any rate, is a very clever-sounding name.

 

Weeeeelll, Australia not so much beat it as gave it a good arse kicking every time it reared it’s ugly head

 

And one of the most whackadoodle you tube presentations with more conspiracy theories per minute than a convention of MJT followers

 

PNG just succumbed to a major outbreak but I am proud to say that Australia has stepped forward with enough aid to at least start fixing the issue

 

Michael Jackson Tribute followers?

 

More like “Elvis is still alive and flipping burgers at Burger King”

 

Wow. Some of you still fail to realize that the moment you are born, everything you need to know about the world is already known. There is nothing left to learn.

This applies everywhere. The day we first notice a new "something," there is nothing, ever, left to learn. Any supposed further "understanding," is just wishy washy.

Sheesh some of you.

 

Papua New Guinea actually placed in the 10 best nations on the wikipedia list I linked, which I'd wondered about: 2,269 confirmed cases, only 26 deaths (the same as New Zealand), w/ a low fatality rate (also matching NZ) of 1.1%, and an even lower per capita deaths per 100k of 0.30-- sorry, once I research something, I like to share the data.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country

What sort of aid is Australia providing?

 

Then what did your abbreviation, MJT, stand for (Magic Jew Tea doesn't have, "followers," and conventions, does it)?

 

It isn't at all clear, from your post, WHAT you are talking about. Unless ambiguity was your aim/is your preference, would you care to at least allude to a particular post(s) to which your "reply," refers?

 

I just thought of another wild guess, for, "convention of MJT followers." Is MELANIA's middle initial, "J," or did she take TheDonald's middle name, as well (as his last)?

 

My apologies if that is a derogatory name I posted; I just googled, "MJT, meaning," & didn't come up with many seeming possibilities.

 

So then it was NEVER about FLATTENING the curve, it was about making sure that there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to flatten, but rather maintain a perfectly straight line.

I can't see any reporting about that. And no wonder - such a move would be unconstitutional.
Biden has already done the only mandate that he has the authority to do, and that was the mandate on federal property - which he promptly violated when he didn't wear a mask in a federal building!

 

You may be right. I' m just passing along something I overheard on Maddow. She's not always right.

 

You watch Maddow? That's a shame.

 

…All things are wearisome, more than one can describe; the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear content with hearing. What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there a case where one can say, “Look, this is new”? It has already existed in the ages before us.…Ecclesiastes 1-9

 

It's about saving lives, people shouldn't use metaphors unless they properly understand that metaphors are not reality

 

What is?

 

I don't usually watch, but it's on, so I typically can hear it; I come out to pay closer attention if some story catches my attention. Why is it, "a shame?" Do you not believe in sampling varied viewpoints? She sometimes is first with an important story, being overlooked by others.

 

She's a partisan left wing radical.

 

I forgot that you live in the ridiculous country which allowed flights from Italy when it was the COVID epicenter of the planet! NO WONDER you're in favour of lockdowns!

 

This may come as a shock to you, my friend, but it would would not be that hard for many to make the case, at least on some issues, that you are a right-wing radical. And you are, most definitely, partisan (even if you're not American). I think it is only self-limiting to oneself, to overly rely on those limiting labels. I would wager you couldn't tell me, specifically, her views on a single topic, from something she had opined, on the air.

I can certainly understand someone not liking her style (at times, I find her grating), or thinking her take was partisan (it certainly is). But that does not make it wrong or dishonest, necessarily. I mean, if I completely avoided anyone with a partisan view who can sometimes get on my nerves, I wouldn't be writing this, now.

And you certainly hear worthwhile news, & sometimes even insightful analysis, on her show. It's not terrible, if you can tolerate her redundancy, in making a point, and the sauntering, sometimes very circuitous route she sometimes takes, getting to her point. In all fairness, some might even lodge these same complaints-- mostly inaccurately-- against me! So, it comes down more, in my view, to a matter of personal tastes.