Lock her up! ... Lock her up!... Lock her... oh oh...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, Jan 11, 2020.

  1. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ones Hillary saw were not classified yet. It's a whole different story with the secretary of state. It's all adds up to a big zero.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2020
  2. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This rather lengthy document covers protection of classified information. It was implemented in 1999. It is very detailed, but this one quote should be adequate.

    "(a) Classified information, regardless of its form, shall be
    afforded a level of protection against loss or unauthorized disclosure
    commensurate with its level of classification."
    https://fas.org/sgp/isoo/safeguard.html
     
  3. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Most were classified already. Some even had their original classified markings, even though there was some effort to remove them. Do you remember the "(c)" marking on one of the documents. Hilary tried to claim that was a paragraph number. That "c" means there was confidential material in that paragraph. Here is the whole FBI report.
    https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/d...o-hillary-clintons-private-email-server/2140/
     
  4. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,466
    Likes Received:
    19,179
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is a fact that is documented in the Mueller Report.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2020
    hellofromwarsaw likes this.
  5. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Blah blah blah. Nothing important. The only difference is the Russians hacked everybody but her and wrecked the election. Emails were totally blown out of all proportion, 60% of political coverage. A disgrace. All came to zip!
     
  6. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I do not know or care about the actual percentage. However, what has been said about her emails is well documented in the FBI report.
     
  7. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    All very illegal. You can deny that all you want, but it does not change the facts.
     
  8. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It wasn't classified when she saw it. The whole thing adds up to zero. She handled emails just like condoleezza and general Powell.
     
  9. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I will go with our justice department and law enforcement oh, not your high school grad ex Coke head bought off DJs. The GOP propaganda machine is pathetic and never retracts anything. Breaking no scandals in Obama administration except garbage propaganda. Ditto Hillary etc etc deep State my butt.
     
  10. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We haven't actually seen the justice report yet, have we?

    But answer a few basic questions:

    Do you now believe that what she did was illegal? What someone else did or did not do, does not change that.

    Do you believe a GI should not be punished for compromising classified information? Because, they would have ended up in Leavenworth, if they did what she did. Doesn't seem fair that she would get off and they would be sent to a military prison. The UCMJ is very hard on such activities.
     
  11. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,466
    Likes Received:
    19,179
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah. And also on two State Department Reports. And the reason I opened this thread is precisely because it is also now documented in a Justice Department Report. Bill Barr's Justice Department.

    Sounds pretty definitive, don't you think?
     
  12. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe in our excellent law enforcement and public servants and do not believe in giant conspiracies like deep state no matter how many times your propagandhi screams about it. It is a disgrace. They checked all your phony scandals and found nothing nothing nothing.
     
  13. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Where are you hiding the report? I have not seen it.
     
  14. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As opposed to Orange conspirator number one
     
  15. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But Do you now believe that what she did was illegal? What someone else did or did not do, does not change that.

    Do you believe a GI should not be punished for compromising classified information? Because, they would have ended up in Leavenworth, if they did what she did. Doesn't seem fair that she would get off and they would be sent to a military prison. The UCMJ is very hard on such activities.
     
  16. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's totally different for a secretary of state. And emails. Just give it up. Our fine government has found out all about emails now, and garbage propaganda about it.
     
  17. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,466
    Likes Received:
    19,179
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ask your Justice Department. I'm not even interested in it. I'm just pointing out how Republicans botched yet another one of their own conspiracy theories.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2020
    hellofromwarsaw likes this.
  18. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    stop parroting garbage propaganda and listen to what law enforcement said. Nothing there worth worrying about
     
  19. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    She was subject to the same laws as the rest of us. But, apparently it is OK with you for a lowly GI go to jail for doing the same thing she did.
     
  20. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Like I said. Where are you hiding the report. I haven't seen it.

    The report may not say she did anything, but I am willing to bet that it will not say that she did not break the law.
     
  21. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    totally different for emails and with a secretary of state. Give it up nobody cares.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2020
  22. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Give it up nobody cares about nothing but garbage propaganda. Except your bought off pundits...
     
  23. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What makes it different for the secretary of state? It applies to all military, civilians and government employees regardless of rank and with the same punishment.
    I know nothing about any paid off pundits. I know I dealt with classified information most of my adult working life and I know of no one of any rank who would have gotten away with it.
     
  24. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    are you talking about Secretary of State emails if not, please give it up LOL
     
  25. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,496
    Likes Received:
    11,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I am talking about the Secretary of State having a server which was used to receive, transmit and store classified information. That server was neither properly protected or certified for classified information. There is absolutely nothing which makes her any different than anyone else handling classified information.
     
    FatBack likes this.

Share This Page