That would actually mean something if Trump won Milwaukee in 2016(Psst: he didn't ). Or any of these other liberal cities on fire. It's ironic : On one hand you claim these protests are against police brutality, then with the other hand you claim Trump supporters are violently burning American cities. So, either Trump supporters are allies of the left's political view or it's a bunch of BS and there's nothing in between. Pick one.
It's a MSDNC talking point - they need to lie about #BLMob burning and looting and rioting, because their support - tacit and/or explicit - of it doesn't poll well.
so the right finally get it, there are bad cops in this country lucky the cops did not mistakenly think he had a counterfeit $20 welcome to Trump's America. Where it's un-American to criticize bad cop behavior
Yeah, I didn't say that. I guess I'll assume you were responding to someone else and mistakenly quoted me. Cute false dichotomy ya got there, based on stuff that I didn't post.
No, I quoted you perfectly. Regardless of the elections the blame is squarely on ANTIFA/BLM and those who supported and encouraged them. You claimed it's Trump's America, are they Trump supporters too?
You quoted me and claimed I said things I didn't. I chose to give you the benefit of the doubt rather than believe that there was a comprehension problem. My mistake. Trump is the current White House occupant. Does that not make this his America? Either the president can do something about this stuff, in which case he isn't actually stopping it now. Or, he can't do anything to stop it, in which case you can't honestly claim that things will be worse due to a Biden presidency because he won't be able to do anything about it either.
When the POTUS did send federal officers to guard the courthouse, these officers fellow citizens were called NAZIS! What makes you think Trump can do anything under these conditions? And you're right, given the deliberate undermining of the government Biden can't do **** either. Unless they approve of a President Biden doing something. But if that happens, not only will the base turn against the democrats but there will be fierce anger by Trump and his supporters on the blantant hypocrisy further weakening the Biden government.
Because "storm troopers" are essentially what he sent in and it made the situation in Portland worse. I actually do think Trump could have some influence on this situation, but he's incapable of leading effectively and usually makes things worse.
thugs and hooligans they are, but they did nothing to justify the use of deadly force. drunk fool ****ed up and was arrested.
He sent federal officers in in a way that was reminiscent of fascists of the past. As I said in post 62, Trump's incapable of handling this situation in a way that will make it better. He doesn't understand how to lead in any way other than ham-fisted tactics that worsen the situtation.
the use of deadly force is only allowed to protect life. none of this occurred. redneck drunk was stupid.
When there is a riot, you send in riot police. You have a better idea? You think they can be reasoned with?
He sent federal law enforcement officers to enforce federal law and protect federal property, during a riot. What do you suggest he have done differently?
At the time they were being sent in, there were maybe 600 protesters showing up every day, and zero "rioting" going on. It flared back up when federal officers started shoving people into unmarked vans.
LOL you can't even help yourself as you say exactly what I outlined while quoting me. You can't make up hilarity this good. PS. Unmarked cars are now a staple of law enforcement including local police departments. Like I said: A reversal, any reversal at all and the fig leafs will blow down the Biden Administration. And you have yourselves to blame. As I have routinely warned, the resistance didn't just damage Trump.
The riots in Portland had stopped at that point. As far as what to do differently, we can start with not putting protesters in unmarked vans.
They didn't stop, every major news outlet including Liberal ones noted 100 days of violence. The state of Oregon failed to protect its people.
For you, it just might be and the best recourse would be to see if Biden's elected and he uses federal officers and the response to that. You're the type that needs visual evidence not intellectual theories.
Demonstrate this to be true. Given that the federal LEOs were there to enforce federal law and protect federal property, what were those people doing?