Maricopa County Ballots Missing?

This will be interesting, if true. Over 2,000,000 ballots were counted in Maricopa, and it seems that a couple hundred thousand might be missing.

Audit Organizer Says Hundreds of Thousands of Ballots MISSING In Arizona, Boxes Full of Blank Ballots
“I also know that there were boxes filled with blank ballots in those pallets. There were blanks in there,” Barnett said, citing a person who is frequently at the audit site as part of the audit process. “They (election officials) were doing it for appearance, to try to hide the fact that ballots are missing by saying, ‘It’s okay, they’re all right here.’ But the ballots are blank.”

“We found a ballot shortage, anywhere from 5 to 10 percent of the votes,” Josh Barnett, an audit organizer who led the affidavit drive to make the audit happen, tells NATIONAL FILE. “It looks like a couple hundred thousand ballots are unaccounted for. The ballots are missing.”

https://nationalfile.com/audit-orga...ssing-in-arizona-boxes-full-of-blank-ballots/

 

If true is the context of your OP correct, that is all you are interested in is the truth?

 

Sure. I don't have any thought that Biden would be replaced at this point. Just want the truth and the facts investigated.

 

Is there a link to your truth searching?

 

Arizona Senate Republicans' 2020 ballot count is almost done. Here's what comes next in the partisan audit.
The hand recount of 2.1 million ballots is expected to end this week, according to spokesman. Next up: A closer look at ballots themselves for alleged irregularities
https://www.12news.com/article/news...audit/75-de057547-d6bc-4d06-af87-4e7623aff42f

Published: 12:25 PM MST June 9, 2021
Updated: 12:25 PM MST June 9, 2021

 

Sorry, my bad.

https://nationalfile.com/audit-orga...ssing-in-arizona-boxes-full-of-blank-ballots/

Also edited the OP to include it there.

 

National File Bias and Reliability Overview
National File is a website featuring news for the “New Right.” Content includes coverage of politics, technology and cultural movements. Founded in August 2019, National File is owned by Flyover Media, LLC. The website records approximately 2.8 million visits per month. Ad Fontes Media rates National File in the hyper-partisan right category of bias and as somewhat unreliable in terms of reliability.

Overall Score
A team of analysts at Ad Fontes Media regularly reviews articles and news programs to rate them in terms of bias and reliability. A weighted average of these ratings results in the overall score for the media source.

The bias rating, demonstrated on the Media Bias Chart®️ on the horizontal axis, ranges from most extreme left to neutral to most extreme right. The reliability rating, demonstrated on the chart’s vertical axis, rates sources on a scale from original fact reporting to analysis, opinion, propaganda and inaccurate/fabricated information.

The following are National File’s overall bias and reliability scores according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Reliability: 17.62

Bias: 23.01

Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 24 are generally acceptable; scores above 32 are generally good.

Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to + 42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being the most neutral and/or balanced.
https://www.adfontesmedia.com/national-file-bias-and-reliability/

 

I saw your genetic fallacy coming from a mile away.

Have anything relevant to the content of the article, by chance?

Here's some reading for you:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy
"The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue)[1] is a fallacy of irrelevance that is based solely on someone's or something's history, origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context. This overlooks any difference to be found in the present situation, typically transferring the positive or negative esteem from the earlier context. In other words, a claim is ignored in favor of attacking or championing its source."

 

Yes, the article is Fake News..Don't cry too much.

 

Okay, just prove it is. We'll all wait.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

 

Is this the Same Josh Barnett who is running for Congress as a Conservative Republican in Arizona's 6th district and a supporter of President Trump?
The same Josh Barnett that pushed for the audit to begin with?
Where are the facts that show this?
Are there fewer or more ballots than in the original count? Is the total for each candidate the same, more or less than in the original count?
Having read your article I see nothing in it that proves his opinion is correct. (No, don't ask me to prove him wrong he has the opinion and it is his job to support it)

 

Yes. Your genetic fallacy is duly noted, and ignored. Issues like this sometimes cause people to run for office because they don't like the corruption.

That's what we're waiting on - and the reason I said "if true".

Fewer, allegedly.

To be determined, of course. If you're missing ballots, someone will end up with less, though.

Thus the "if true" part of my post.

 

Nothing says flailing like asking someone to prove a negative.

 

Hey, there are tickets (a cool 1,200 bucks) available for Trump’s 2nd inauguration. Get ‘em before they sell out!

 

He made an assertive claim to KNOW the article was "Fake News".

Just like I can "know" and can "prove" there is no elephant in my living room as I type taking a dump on my carpet. Some negatives can be proven. In this case, it's not even proving a negative. If he KNOWS it is "Fake News" he can just provide the proof and we can all move on with our lives.

Maybe you should brush up on your logic.

 

I disagree. I believe there is an elephant in your living room.

Prove me wrong.

 

We could, hypothetically, hop on a zoom call right now and you could see for yourself that there is currently no elephant in my living room defiling the carpet.

Or maybe an even better example.

I can prove to you without a Zoom call that there is no full scale replica of the Titanic in my living room right now, hitting an ice berg. How? A full size replica of the Titanic would not physically fit in my living room. Ergo, we can prove a negative without a Zoom call, too, unless you believe I have a massively large living room.

 

We could hypothetically do all kinds of stuff.

You should do some research on Russell's Teapot.

It may help you.

 

"if true" part of my post


So we don't know if it is true?

 

So these morons Cyber Ninjas lost the ****ing ballots?

About what was expected to happen

 

Who said that, besides you? Have any evidence? Of course you don't.

 

It is not our job to prove the ballots are not missing, it is the job of the one making the claim they are missing to prove it.

Why do you so blindly believe these things when there is never any thing given to support their claims?

 

That's what I posted. Not sure what part about "if true" you don't understand.

Maybe you just didn't even read my post before you responded?

 

I have every bit as much evidence that they do in their claims they are missing.

Since you are so big on asking this...prove they do not lose them or hide them or destroy them.

 

I didn't say it was. Do try and keep up with the discussion.