Maricopa County Ballots Missing?

Thanks for proving my point.

 

If they violate federal law while doing it they can have interjection.

 

In the US, elections are actually conducted by local authorities, working under local, state, and federal law and regulation, as well as the US Constitution. It is a highly decentralized system.

https://www.ncsl.org/research/elect...administration-at-state-and-local-levels.aspx

 

Hard to violate federal law when elections are state law.

 

This is interesting but I'm not sure the audit will actually find anything. So far they have nothing.

 

did republicans do something "freaky with them"

 

agree, it's just gonna go on and on until they hope people have lost interest at this point as they are not finding anything

and as they are pro-Trump, they will never admit they found nothing, it will just disband and be over....

 

This coming from someone who says orange man bad and supports the Democrats in every thread you post in.

Or maybe you all hate Trump so much you don't want to think of a outcome where there was cheating to ensure Trump lost.

Several Democrats actually signed a letter saying they thought thier was election fraud. It went away after Joe Biden won. Democrats saw it a problem until for them it was not a problem.

 

So the Voting Rights Act never happened?

 

While I know it is just easier to put everyone in one of two groups, this simply is not true. Prior to the start of 2020 I thought Trump had been a pretty average POTUS. Nothing to write home about but he did not have any major failure (ie. the Iraq War or the ACA). Even after his failed response to COVID I would still have put him as the best POTUS this century, but admittedly that is a very low bar. But his actions after the election quickly moved him to the top of the list for the worst president ever.

Other than the election and sometimes COVID I do not side with the Dems all that often. I differ with them on minimum wage, the 2nd Amendment, governmental spending, healthcare, the SCOTUS and far more than I agree with them.

That is just silly. I do not hate anyone. Hate take effort and a level of caring I do not have to anyone, including Trump.

 

Sometimes. Sometimes not. And oh the irony there.

 

I have. Thanks. We can also prove there are no elephants serving in Congress, no married bachelors, etc. Lots of negatives may be proven.

 

Prove that Ted Cruz is not an elephant wearing a magical disguise.

That is not proving a negative, that is a logical inconstancy.

 

Article. I.
Section. 4.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

Article. II.

Details the president and the election..
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript#toc-section-4-

You should try reading it sometime with someone who knows what words mean..

 

If the magical disguise is such that even his DNA shows him to be human, and x-rays and other examinations show him to be human, and he can never take off the magical disguise, then for all practical purposes, he's a human.

There are different types of negatives.

Back on track - the original poster said that the article was "Fake News". But cannot prove his claim. It could be proven to be Fake News and that would not be proving a negative. He could simply show his evidence documenting it as fake news.

 

Have you ever seen his DNA?

 

Actually, it is fake news because the claim is not supported by the article. They make a claim and do not offer any proof of said claim.

That is the very essence of what fake news is

 

Yet no law so…

Of course democrats are trying to pass laws to take over elections. HR1 or HR4, their backup plan gives Federal ultimate power over dictating elections from central control. I doubt they would hold up in a court of law since there is this inconvenient thing called the constitution. Your quote does not mention a president.

Of course democrats are dumb by trying to fundamentally change our democratic institutions because they never think it will be used by anyone else. Like Harry Reid’s change for the Senate approving judges.

 

I did notice that this story fell flat on it's face.

 

HR1 is The For the People Act is a bill in the United States Congress intended to expand voting rights, change campaign finance laws to reduce the influence of money in politics, limit partisan gerrymandering, and create new ethics rules for federal officeholders.
It doesn't change the Constitution so it can't become highly centralized.

 

If it is Fake News, then it should be provable false. Like I said at first, "if true". I posted it because it is information being passed about the audit. Maybe it turns OUT to be fake news eventually, maybe not. If you have proof it is fake news, post it up.

 

Presumably we could go get a sample - hypothetically. Since we're talking hypotheticals anyway.

 

How would anyone of us prove it to be false?

And it is really our job to prove it to be false or is it the job of the one making the claim to prove it.

If I made a claim about you without any supporting evidence would it be up to you to prove it was false or up to me to prove it to be true?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

 

Maybe find another article where the facts were corrected?

I said, "if true". So I'm not making a hard claim about the article. It's the "It's Fake News" claim that is a certain claim that now has to be proven. Thanks.