Nadler invitation to Trump

Are you not aware of Trump's current approval rating? Voters have turned away in droves, until only his core base remain faithful. Sorry, I know it sucks, but you do not represent the majority of we the people.

 

Maybe because he'll be stuck with the consequences? Oh ... wait ... Trump has never had to face consequences before. Maybe he thinks he can duck it, as usual.

 

Yeah, it's not like they haven't been whining about "no due process!" for weeks now. The sudden silence is deafening.

 

Hah! Do you know what a high crime is?

Quiz: Explain using 12 words or less what a "high crime" is.

Man! Your 2020 is going to be so full of surprises!

 

what depositions from Zelinski and shokin??

both are NOT an american citizen and have NO obligation to this country in legal matters

if they lie how would they be charged with purgery??

if they did give depositions , the sad thing is

the republicans will defend 2 foriegn citizen while discrediting the american citizens

 

Well.... wait a minute. I he did that, then calling it a Circus would be accurate.

Let's not give them ideas...

 

Nonsense this carries zero real consequences.

 

Well given that the examples bribery and treason and you have zero evidence of either. You're pretty much SOL.

 

Nadler and his anti-American Communist cohorts can go pound sand!!!!!

 

We're not getting any in the House, the Senate will be a different story.

 

The dems keep trying but Trump keeps winning. He will be re-elected and the dems' circus will continue. The dems will pay a big price. Makes me happy.

 

The evidence points to very high crimes...the kind one usually finds coming from a Mafia Don.

Trump is an extortionist. Always has been and everyone knows it. Now that he is president, he is able to extort (or attempt to extort) entire countries rather than the foolish vendors who were willing to work for him back when he was just a cheap chiseler.

 

Trump circular logic:

-I am not invited to defend myself, therefore it's a show trial.
-It's a show trial, so I am not going to defend myself, even though I am invited

This makes sense only in Trump fan world.

 

Be careful what you wish for. If Trump gets re-elected, the chances that he'll have another four years without recession are pretty slim. Let's see if people still back him when the wheels come off the magic "Trump economy".

 

You're assuming nothing else has changed in between, it has. Nadler is a formality, nothing more if the Dems can get the votes they will impeach There is nothing Trump can do about that. It doesn't matter to the Democrats that their evidence is scarce worth a plug nickle. All Trump showing up to this circus will do is add unwarranted validity to the effort. That's the only reason Nadler invited him in the first place.

 

"Scarce"?

*LOL*

Read the transcripts. Then read the Mueller Report. The evidence is as scarce as water is in the ocean.

 

Nonsense the evidence, what there is of it, points to Trump not trusting the striped pants set and little else. Sorry but hurting official Washington's feelings is not an impeachable offense.

 

Been there done that you are wrong.

 

The only one with reason to complain later will be you because When the Dems circular firing squad is done, and the senate trial conducted Trump will still be president, with about a sixty percent chance to be reelected, in spite of, if not because of the lefts histrionics.

 

I find it hilarious that so many Trump loyalists who try to defend Trump despite the overwhelming evidence of high crimes don't even know what a high crime is.

Get back to us when you know the difference between a crime and a high crime.

 

It will be interesting to see Nadler in action. Honestly, I don't believe Nancy has much faith in Nadler to bring it home for them. I am sure she is concerned it may be a swing and a miss.

 

I find it hilarious that you think high crimes in spite of the two examples given in the reference document can be what ever you want them to be. I find it further hilarious that you who have in our various coverstations demonstrated no understanding of basic American Jurisprudence think that anything that was said in all Of Schiff's days of Testimony as to what they heard through the grape vine constitute useful proof of anything other than the fact that a lot of the striped pants set don't like Trump mainly because he doesn't think as much of them as they do.

 

You've read the Mueller Report? All of it?

 

Yep enough to know that it is one of the more ambiguous legal documents I've ever seen.

 

MOre wrong