The two most important issues we face are threats to survival of all life on the planet: The potential for nuclear war and permanent environmental catastrophe. In this environment of media propaganda, one can envision a scenario in which Washington gets away with demonstrating it's "nuclear primacy" to the world by obliterating Russia and overcoming its counterattack with missile defenses - "an adjunct to a US First Strike capability". This is actually a very real possibility, as is detailed below. This is compilation thread that will updated. The basics first. As declared in a U.S. National Security Strategy, the underlying purpose of U.S. power is to "actively work to bring the hope of democracy, development, free markets, and free trade to every corner of the world." "Free trade," it says, is "true freedom.":
Hillary and Obama brought WW3 a step closer for us all- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To my American friends I say- when the nukes start dropping a few years from now it'll be too late to protect your kids and grandkids, so protect them NOW by putting Don in the White House to undo the mess..
[video=youtube_share;MhIIIXp8lXw]http://youtu.be/MhIIIXp8lXw[/video] Notice, it's presupposed that it's to "deter" Russian aggression. If Russia was doing this in Latin America it would rightly be called "provocative". Reuters cannot really believe these moves are meant to deter the Russian superpower from reconquering Eastern Europe. And they pretend the U.S. didn't orchestrate the coup in Ukraine in 2013. It never happened because "our side" did it, just like the corporate media has always done with every U.S. imperial act. From covertly overthrowing governments to "low intensity warfare" against the poor. We have to wait for the National Security Archive to get the internal documents: It gets better: Credit to Jimmy for pointing this out.
[video=youtube_share;7H0LjaE4vlA]http://youtu.be/7H0LjaE4vlA[/video] [video=youtube_share;Tg5T0SYpa04]http://youtu.be/Tg5T0SYpa04[/video]
This wouldn't be the first time the U.S. military overruled the President. The CIA as well. There appears to be a pseudo secret government that determines and executes U.S. foreign policy if the President isn't sufficiently cooperative in furthering the "national interest" abroad: As I pointed out here: In the current President's own remarks on May 23, 2012, in a graduation speech at the Air Force Academy: So Obama's differences with the U.S. military are merely disagreements among imperialists over how to maintain dominance over the world: This the most dangerous propaganda corporate news has ever pushed on us. Particularly on the Ukraine issue and the danger that Hillary and the "secret government" pose to the world: As John Pilger put it:
If America comes under nuke attack, Don would hit the "Retaliatory Strike" button without any hesitation or hand-wringing, what a man! Hey Mr. Wayne, would you hesitate if a comanche war party came at you?" "That'll be the day!"
I smelled smoke and found fire, as always. [video=youtube_share;4amgOoCE5gY]http://youtu.be/4amgOoCE5gY[/video] Note that in 2011, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Pitched Iraq As 'A Business Opportunity' For US Corporations, IB Times, 9/30/15: That is: Turning back to this: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [video=youtube_share;f7NsXFnzJGw]http://youtu.be/f7NsXFnzJGw[/video]
The concept of nuclear winter was discredited decades ago. And even Carl Sagan, one of its key architects and advocates admitted the data did not support it.