LOL! You libs are so amusing..... lol..... And then there's JFK and Bill Clinton - how quickly one forgets! Lol..... Yeah, yeah, we're all aware that the ex isn't running for POTUS - I was just pointing out that this ex was his mistress when he was married to #1.... and all this stuff happened ... what? 15 yrs ago? Everyone already knows about his cheating background, but now we have to hear it all over again - it's NOT new news!
of course, its the womans fault newt proposes while still married and asks his wife if he can have an affair....
Nope. I'm not hypocritical. I don't support one moral deviant over another simply because they happen to be of a certain political party. Neither party is worth such blind partisan support as far as I am concerned.
Did Gingrich father a child out of wedlock which he denied and then illegally use campaign funds to pay someone to lie about it and illegally use campaign funds to pay her off? If Edward's marriage had fallen apart and he had divorce his wife and married someone else he would have had no problems.
I thought if you were "open minded" you didn't care about such things. Remember how we were suppose to be "open minded" about Bill Clinton?
It would have been big news if it came out. The stations want to sell ads, the papers want to sell papers. If it gets the numbers it gets the print or the air. There is no way in the world for you to support your argument.
No, part of the reason his first marriage fell apart was because after marrying his high school teacher and then going to college and growing up and deciding on his future, government service, his much older wife said that is not the life she wanted. He decided to pursue the life in politics he desired and the marriage fell apart as she would not leave Georgia. When marriages reach such impasse they are very likely to fall apart and one or both find themselves more attracted to people who support their life's desires. Did she really think her marriage to her high school student would last?
If what came out, it didn't there is no evidence that Gingrich ever fathered a child out of wedlock or illegally use campaign funds to cover it up. Politicians get married and divorced, that's life. Edward's problem was the child and the denials at the time and the illegal use of campaign funds. That is why he is on trial. Is Gingrich on trial for something?
Hillary has no class, she enabled her husbands sleazy treatment of women and took part in the cover ups about his behaviors so he could get elected and then get her chance.
Here is the problem with ABC News and the rest of the National (Democratic Party) News Media. This interview should have happened before the Iowa primary. Everyone knew about Newt and the 1st wife had some issues, but they refused to cover it properly until they could damage the GOP. Their goal is Mitt Romney. Newt was surging again, so now is the time to nuke him. I would have liked to see him drop out before Iowa if he was going to drop out and offer Santorum, Johnson, Paul, etc... the opportunity to receive those votes. This hit piece is well timed and nothing but establishment Democratic Party agenda. Does everyone know that ABC News had the audio tapes of Jennifer Flowers and Bill Clinton prior to the election? Did they release them? Nooooooo!!! How about their timing on the Bush DUI? How about their timing with Dan Rather on the counterfeit/fake memo from the Air force? We have a media that is absolutely manipulating the populace to enforce its desired agenda. The sad part is that some people don't recognize it and therefore sometimes they actually pull off their garbage. They should air the interview immediately. If they are going to attack Newt, then let's get it done. When they are finished, can they dwell into Barack Obama's college years? Can we find out who paid for his college? Can we find out how he got accepted to Columbia University and Harvard Law School? Can we find out if he indeed applied as a foreign student? Why does the National Mainstream Media never ask these questions? Why can't we vet Barack Obama to the same extent that we do these Republican Candidates?
The standard was set. If Bill Clinton was electable and reelectable, and STILL a leader in the Democratic Party and STILL put up on a pedestal and admired by the left with his treatment of women and his wife then there is no issue here with Gingrich.
And let's not forget their real god - FDR. He was not pure in his marriage, either. There are plenty on both sides of the aisle. The only difference is that we admit it and the socialists defend and deny it.
You are Mad. What about all the gay republicans that are found out and outed, with senate pages and in airports? There is no difference. Power is the common denominator, and secrecy is always the goal.
He loves cankles? If you are a raping Juanita Broderick, molesting Paula Jones, molesting Kathleen Wylie, banging Jennifer Flowers, and getting BJ's from Monica Lewinsky... you think he has some deep love for his wife? Or Hillary for Bill? Hillary was in it for the power... she got it... mission accomplished.
Did I state he never did it? Why no. Go troll elsewhere. Yes they did report on it. Edward's machinations managed to hide it for some time. And no, the MSM only "reported" on it once it became apparent that the damage to Edwards couldn't get any worse. It's the MO of the MSM. Hannity breaks the story of Reverend Wright in April 2007 and it gets swept under the rug until the MSM can no longer keep it covered in April of 2008.
Start with this, 3 years of unemployment at or above 9%. Three years of new claims for unemployment at or above 400,000. Three years of net jobs loses. $850 TRILLION wasted on a failed stimulus plan. Billions wasted on failed home mortgage relief. GDP growth almost none existent. Labor force participation falling. Food stamps at historic highs and growing. World-wide respect falling. Our enemies gaining ground as we retreat. No Social Security reform even proposed. No tax reform even proposed. No deficit plan even proposed totally ignoring HIS OWN debt commission.
The media wants to make money? Can you explain to me why they are all losing money? I'll help you out. It's because they'd rather spin their ideology than do what there media outlets were designed for. Fair, honest journalism.
I am not a lib, and I have not advocated for JFK nor Clinton. The fact of the matter is that Bill Clinton hasn't been a player for office for a long long time, but we constantly have references by the Republican partisans to his marital infidelities. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, all we hear from the partisan Republicans is how Bill Clinton and JFK cheated, and how the ex-wife was with a married man. Newt Gingrich is running for POTUS and he has shown to be morally bankrupt. That IS news to some people and they should know the truth before they vote for a man that they wouldn't support if they knew his true moral character.
Exactly... that is the only way to explain the market share beatings that CNN and MSNBC take in regards to Fox News.