well said Flounder , and the thing is , Newt can't say not one word back , he's got to take it . . I watched less than a minute of the interview , , and it was as vicious an attack as I've seen in a long time , , I've heard it said that it's a thin line between Love & Hate , and whatever happened between them years ago , if Newt hadn't already paid the dues in D-court , he's paying them now . . . sheeesh.
isn't this guy suppose to represent the conservative evangelical christian party? no open marriages, thats a liberal phenomenon.
No, I did read. You wanted to suggest a difference between your sexually obsessed politicians and the so called "socialist" ones. Did I miss something?
No, there is another way. Fox panders to its audience and bends its programming to spoon feed them the narrative they crave. MSNBC does the same to a narrower demographic. CNN is pretty neutral, which doesn't seem to play to either side that is craving talking points more than information. There can always be other explanations, if you want to look for them. But you have to start with wanting to.
So why does it make a difference? Weren't we told in the run-up to the 1996 Presidential election that character didn't matter? Why does it matter now? Isn't this what liberalism wanted all along? Sex with anyone, no moral backlash for anything? I'm not singling you out. You just seemed to bring me to the thought.
Yes you did. I compared socialists like you to conservatives like me. Not politicians. We admit to the mistakes and stupidity of our politicians. You deny and defend them. Now you go on ignore like the rest of your kind. It's a waste of time to even try to discuss anything with people like you.
Aren't you being hypocritical if back in 1996, moral character was an issue for you, but now that it is affecting a candidate you support you are willing to over look it and portray it as a non-issue? Even if it were a "Democrat/liberal" ideology to accept such behavior, doesn't that make "Republican/conservatives" hypocrites for wanting to avoid it in this case when they clearly made a big stink about it in 1996?
...just quit it...if it weren't Newt, you be ragging on Mit...at least be honest enough to admit you are picking on any convienent conservative... Kabuki Joe
...so since you continuosly support the left and trash the right, I guess you are neutral?... Kabuki Joe
Here is the problem with ABC News and the rest of the National (Democratic Party) News Media. This interview should have happened before the Iowa primary. Everyone knew about Newt and the 1st wife had some issues, but they refused to cover it properly until they could damage the GOP. Their goal is Mitt Romney. Newt was surging again, so now is the time to nuke him. I would have liked to see him drop out before Iowa if he was going to drop out and offer Santorum, Johnson, Paul, etc... the opportunity to receive those votes. This hit piece is well timed and nothing but establishment Democratic Party agenda. Does everyone know that ABC News had the audio tapes of Jennifer Flowers and Bill Clinton prior to the election? Did they release them? Nooooooo!!! How about their timing on the Bush DUI? How about their timing with Dan Rather on the counterfeit/fake memo from the Air force? We have a media that is absolutely manipulating the populace to enforce its desired agenda. The sad part is that some people don't recognize it and therefore sometimes they actually pull off their garbage. They should air the interview immediately. If they are going to attack Newt, then let's get it done. When they are finished, can they dwell into Barack Obama's college years? Can we find out who paid for his college? Can we find out how he got accepted to Columbia University and Harvard Law School? Can we find out if he indeed applied as a foreign student? Why does the National Mainstream Media never ask these questions? Why can't we vet Barack Obama to the same extent that we do these Republican Candidates?
...but you're a liberal, are you really a man or do you just think you are?...liberalism = women/feminist views... Kabuki Joe
Now that's a stiff debating spine. How is that working for you? Do you want to see the many threads defending all kinds of absurd behavior, both liberal and conservative? You can look them up. Everyone is guilty. People on this thread defended the airport pee-er with the wide stance, the page pursuer, and so on. You flatter yourself, Mad.
...let's not forget JFK and his brother Bobby were suspects in Marilyn Monroe's murder...and from what has been said about it, both were "boinking" her...I know, I know, this is different... Kabuki Joe
Bubba stayed so that set the stage, Bubba also never served in the military where as MOST presidents have. Bubba was the trend setter for all things bad it seems. Will the truth ever come out from his numerous rape allegations or him giving the young intern venereal herpes? Hope Vince Foster's daughter Chelsea forced him to use protection when he forced himself on her.
Where did I support the left? Because I don't disregard Newt Gingrich's utter lack of moral character, I'm supporting the left? Perhaps you should ask yourself why you see everything in such a ridiculous duality.
As far as Clinton goes, I'm far more concerned with his dealings with China, his signing of NAFTA and GAT, and covering for CIA drug running through Arkansas when he was Governor. But this thread is about Newt Gingrich, presidential candidate,and his lack of moral character.
No wonder where $5.6 TRILLION has gone in 3 years. To all unconstitutional projects that have helped NO BODY. Just tossing money at a problem doesn't mean its fixed, there has been no help to the homeless. No equal pay for women. There is nothing in that pack of lies that has shown any improvement to which you can measure. It is a bunch of BULL(*)(*)(*)(*).