Parents of 'Adolf Hitler' Lose Custody of Newborn

Aryan rhymes with Mary Ann.

 

Your rewriting of history is laughable at best and absolutely pathetic at worst. I'm betting that you're one of those Holocaust-is-a-myth type of folk. The German people did not write the Holocaust into Nazi Germany's policies, dude. Hitler and the Third Reich did. Most Germans were either unaware that the Holocaust was even happening or were conveniently ignoring it by looking the other way, writing off those human ash fallouts across the countryside as "snowfall" and such.

And where in the hell did I compare Adolf Hitler to MLK? Putting words in my mouth and replying to those words doesn't win you any arguments around here, son.

 

Yes, by giving them their names. If you don't believe they will suffer as a result of their parents retarded ideology you need to think again. The parents themselves might not be abusive but they sure as sh1t opened the door for anyone else to abuse the children, and it doesn't therefore make them any less guilty.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariana_(name)

 

It is telling that even Germans who should have the last name Hitler because of relation to the fellow don't call themselves that.

As to Donald Duck... I imagine him being taken away cause of his name and move into a home where they decide to call him Daffy, making the problem worse?

 

---You're suggesting the child's formative years should be steeped in controversy and drama to keep intact his parent's "right" to treat him like a nonperson? His parents should be focused on discovering and cultivating his talents, providing a mentally and financially stable home and exposing him to environments that are conducive to the nurturing of his talents. Instead, they've surrounded him with controversy by using him to invoke the infamy of a heinous human being.
---Children are not property. Children are people. The parents in this situation have behaved completely selfishly. They've treated their child like a car bumper; slap some provocative sticker on it and showcase to the world your personal beliefs. Never mind what the child will suffer, he's just an organic computer awaiting whatever program his parents elect.
---If you have any concern for the well being of the child don't suggest that his formative years be mired by a courtroom circus. If all you're concerned about is the parents right to do whatever they please to another human being you're drawing a line that is parallel to the State's decision to do whatever they want to another human being; what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Right?

 

They should be taken away not because of the names but because of the garbage that is going to be inevitably put in their head over their years. Kids who come from those environments often end up in prison or are considered outcasts. It is child abuse no matter how you look at it. Intentionally poisoning a young persons mind to the point where a productive life is hard to obtain.

 

Eh, I'm having religion issues right now anyway...

 

A funny thing happened on the way to Utopia....

A state that is permitted more and more authority to base "corrective" or punitive...controlling... actions on arbitrary abstracts, on prediction, preconception, presumption....

on 'what ifs'....

is a terrifyingly steep, slippery slope...

that offers no other option but to terminate in the muck, mire and morass of dystopia.

 

I hope you find peace. Whatever side you land on. Like I said... wasn't really trying to have the discussion.

 

Don't forget any Hispanic children named Fidel!

 

I suspect they COULDN'T legally change their names if they wanted to...a judge wouldn't allow it.

 

Real-life names...
Dick Hertz (not Richard, his name is Dick)
Archibald Francis Gardner
Rufis Gabriel Loonfeather
Elvis Aron Pettibone
Coco Crisp
Paul J. Lady
Richard Head

Heck, I know of at least three men named Tracy, and several named Kim. ALL of those would "almost certainly" get them teased at school.

 

Don't the parents have any rights?

I hear gays demanding the right to adopt all the time and they were outraged back in the day when the government considered them unfit to be parents.

 

When homosexual parents start telling their kids that straights are less than human and preach violence of those said straight people, then you may have a point.

 

Are those kids head being filled with hate by ignorant bigoted loser parents?

 

Children intentionally given any name that would cause them to be ostracized from the society in which they are being raised should be taken way. The welfare of the child always supersedes the parent's right of self expression.

What about white parents who live in watts and name their child the n-word.

 

That's ridiculous. What about all the people that will be named Timothy McVeigh in the future? You're full of crap, Pocket Pool.

 

It doesn't matter what the social or political opinions of the parents are because in America we are free to hold unpopular opinions.

 

If I ever named my future son that name, he would be a much loved and treasured human being. The light of my life!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgePEO7GUtE"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgePEO7GUtE[/ame]

 

Coming from the king of full of crap that doesn't mean much.

Your for child abuse. Good for you. Filling kids head with racist garbage is no different than molesting them sexually.

 

The issue isn't peer badgering.. it is that the parents are so unconcerned about the welfare of their child that they would intentionally set him up for such things.

The issue with lies in relationships isn't that there are lies.. it is that there are liars. he same principle applies here. The main issue isn't that the name is potentially irrevocably damaging to the child.. it is that the parents are willing to take that risk for the sake of exercising their right to be offensive.

The name can be changed but if the parents aren't changed the child is no better off.

 

Adolf Hitler is just a name, dude. How is it racist?

As long as you're fostering this idiotic belief that a person's name is racist, you might want to track down these two guys in Kentucky and give 'em what for!

 

My concern is less with the name and more with the ideals that are surely gonna be taught by parents who would give those sorts of names. Teaching kids ideals that will inevitably end them up in prison or severely stunt them socially is child abuse. Plain and simple. Again no different than molesting them sexually.

 

Would some liberal please list the acceptable names in which FREE peoples can name their children? Or at the least a list in which FREE peoples cannot name their children. Lets get to brass tacks here.