Read Elizabeth Warren’s lips: No middle class tax hike to fund $20T Medicare for All

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Steve N, Nov 2, 2019.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    still can’t find any data to rebut what you’ve been given I see. It’s ok, we both know why.
     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You linked me to a search engine. Link me to a peer reviewed paper that rebuts the one I gave you. You can’t do that of course, and you, I and everyone else reading this knows why.
     
  3. JET3534

    JET3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Messages:
    13,403
    Likes Received:
    11,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sadly, this is the truth. The question is, what, if anything, can be done to wake up low information voters. Maybe they just have Jimmy Carter experience (again for the old liberals) with the double digit mortgage loans, embassy take overs, 55 mph speed limit and so forth. Of course a Warren or a Bernie would be ten time worse than Carter.
     
  4. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,801
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You asked me to refute an argument you didn't make.

    I refuted it.

    You asked me for data.

    I gave you data.

    This entire conversation you have made a lot of demands, but the only argument you made so far was one that was self refuting. (That you can't prove a negative)



     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Paying for a unicorn with a unicorn.
     
    Zorro likes this.
  6. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your data doesn't have a conclusion to refute.
    Your paper doesn't even make the conclusion you are stating. And I bet you cant point it out
     
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You gave me a link to a search engine. It’s ok though, everyone knows why you can’t provide a peer reviewed paper to rebut the one I’ve provided.
     
  8. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    “Nuh uh” isn’t an argument or rebuttal. Sorry.
     
  9. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kindly point out the conclusion, in your paper, that you would like me to rebutt
     
  10. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Provide a paper that draws the conclusion you state
     
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still can’t find a peer reviewed paper to rebut mine I see. It’s ok, everyone knows why.
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Already have. You’ve failed repeatedly to present a paper that rebuts it. Lol
     
  13. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm waiting.
    Conclusion please
     
  14. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Point out the conclusion please.
     
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still can’t find a paper to rebut mine I see, lol
     
  16. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Read the paper, then cite one of your own that rebuts it. We all know why you can’t do that.
     
  17. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    64,222
    Likes Received:
    13,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not True - there are plenty of people - including the KOCH brothers and numerous other Republicans - that realize that our current system is far more expensive than what other first world nations pay - all of which have universal healthcare.

    We spent 3.5 Trillion on healthcare in 2017. This is roughly double/per person what other first world nations pay. If done properly (which of course the Dems will not do) there is 1.75 Trillion dollars on the table - and we should be able to do better given economies of scale.
     
  18. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,587
    Likes Received:
    52,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hoosier8 and squidward like this.
  19. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Conclusion please
     
  20. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still can’t find a peer reviewed paper to rebut mine I see. Lol.
     
  21. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't find the conclusion that states what you say it states. Can you be so kind as to point it out?
     
  22. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please cite the conclusion of your paper.
     
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because you still haven’t read the paper. You are avoiding it at all costs, because it shatters your ideology. You can’t provide a part to rebut mine, and we both know why.
     
  24. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Read the paper.
     
  25. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Total Fail.
     

Share This Page