Medical procedures are decided by doctors. Or would you prefer that medical decisions are in the hands of the people?
There's another big difference: Progressives think all poverty is the same, so don't care if vast resources are lost to the non-genuine.
If she didn't want "it" inhabiting her body, she would have used her body in a way which didn't invite that potential. Obviously.
Do you not understand that those two things are not mutually exclusive? Both can be true: it's not really up to you nor I to determine what their religion requires, AND the SCOTUS was complying with the Constitution, not religion. This stuff really isn't that hard if you stop to think about it for a couple of minutes.
The other day I drank a bunch but dammit I didn't consent to getting drunk or having a hangover. Who do I sue?
Answer this question. Is having sexual intercourse 100% guaranteed to result in conception. Yes or no?
That's kind of a side-effect of their inherent incompetence I think. Some is built-in for graft though.
Rapes happen. Married women sometimes get divorced while pregnant. Married women may have medical issues that make carrying to term problematic. Women may develop gestational diabetes while pregnant making carrying to term dangerous. It's like conservatives know nothing about pregnancy other than forcing a woman to carry to term.
17% of abortions are married couples. Less than 1% is rapes. Nearly zero women have abortions due to medical problems. We know that 94-95% of abortions happen because people are irresponsible.
Sure. https://hd.housedivided.dickinson.edu/node/38983 On a party line vote, the U.S. Senate votes to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia 04/03/1862 After protracted debate, the United States Senate passed the contentious bill to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia with a vote of twenty-nine for, fourteen against, and five senators not voting. The tally showed a distinct partisan divide since all the affirmative votes came from Republicans, while all the Democrats and Unionists voted against or absent. One Republican, John Henderson of Missouri, voted in the negative. The House voted the bill through on April 11, 1862, and President Lincoln signed it into law on April 16, 1862. (By John Osborne) Source Citation Senate Vote #245 (April 3, 1862), http://www.govtrack.us/congress
Our One-Liner pal, Cybred, will come back with "sex is no guarantee of conception". You should apply that to your night on the booze, V12. Sue the booze manufacturers for 'forcing' you to be drunk.
Ah, so you're not an insensitive jerk laughing at 6,000 or so women every year who become pregnant after having been raped. And what about those 6,000 women? What does partial birth abortion have to do with it?
I would like to know how you calculate the percentage of things that go unreported? How in the hell do you put a number on the unknown? Just give it your wildest guess?
I agree, but they've corrupted the DoJ. Garland won't prosecute them. They won't even be banned from Twitter.
