Russian aligarch calls Mueller's bluff, will see him in court, catches him totally off guard.

I see no evidence of any crime in your post or that link you set.

Okay I see your point now. Yes, we've been aware of these protests before Trump even won the nomination and know all about the 'Insurance Policy'.

If you feel this is the first time I've said something dumb then you just haven't been paying close attention.

 

Follow the link. Read the motion in entirety and especially the attached emails.

Dates are settled.

The government failed here.

 

Lavrentiy Beria said that while he was conducting Stalin's purges. Even Alan Dershowitz, a lifelong Democrat, pointed out how Mueller's witch hunt was no different than the ones Beria carried out while he was head of the Soviet secret police (NKVD).

 

I'M homeless. Do you have a contact number for Russian's?

 

No, you're trying to put words in my mouth.

Whether Mueller has evidence of collusion is completely independent of whatever he asks Trump.

I don't actually think it's necessary for Mueller to interview Trump. It would be to his advantage to let the Grand Jury subpoena him.

Tricking an idiot like Trump into doing what you want him to do isn't hard. Most world leaders understand that is the only effective way to deal with him. Although it's far better to ignore him (and his country) altogether. After all, Trump can't be trusted to keep his word to anyone about anything.

And there is a lot more to being a successful political leaders than winning one election by accident. And, the only reason he got as far as he did, was because the rules were set in such a way that you never actually had to get a majority in order to be the winner.

 

'Self proclaimed facist'? Prove this ore stop posting.

 

LOL. If trump could be tricked so easily, because he is an idiot, he would not have been so successful. Now you can claim as some have here prior, that he really isn't successful, which means he is really a pauper masquerading as a rich guy, but that fails due to the idiocy involved.

He is such an idiot, that he beat all GOP contenders, and he then went on to beat a person who was supposedly unbeatable, according to all of the experts. So, to call trump an idiot, appears to me to be what a genuine, certified idiot would find himself doing. It just not hold up to scrutiny. But it does prove what hatred and partisanship does to the human brain. It is like bringing an abacus to a meeting of computer geeks.

 

I'll post as I please.

 

Trump hasn't been that successful.

He inherited it, and has frittered much of it away over the years in a long series of bad deals.

Few people in his line of work take him seriously, and most avoid doing busines with him. He's not a real estate giant, even in New York. He plays one on TV or the entertainment of people who believe tabloids.

Quite a few people think he's actually all but insolvent. I don't know that, but I doubt that he is a billionaire at all.

And the Russians own him, lock stock and barrel.

 

Grounds for DISMISSAL, actually. MASSIVE Witch Hunt IMCOMPETENCE, to go along with its corruption.

 

The POTUS has had 1% of his hundreds of businesses fail. 1%.

Still confused ,<Mod Edit- Rule 3/4> about who Putin owns, lock, stock and barrel, we see.

Allow me to , once again, clear it up for you:





And:




Do I even need to bring up Crimea, the Ukraine, the reneged-upon European missile defense shield, ignored crime while handing over 20% of our uranium reserves, doing NOTHING to prevent the Russian cyber attacks, despite months of forewarning?

Meanwhile , Pres.Trump bombs Russians and their allies...TWICE.

Pretty clear who Putin's BI**CH is, and has ALWAYS BEEN....

 

How can I be putting words in our mouth when I'm quoting your own words?

On what grounds?

Okay, I'm putting what you said again. Is this putting words in your mouth? You repeat that the only they can get anything against the President is through "trickery". If there was anything of substance, and with 18 layers and Mueller working against him, can't they find anything on him without using deception? In fact Mueller just added another Democrat lawyer to his team last week.

Most world leaders aren't dealing with Trump; he's dealing with them.

What 'rules' are you talking about? The Electoral College? Where do you live?

 

Any idea of how much he inherited and his worth now? It should be easy enough to investigate before making these claims.

 

I know Trumpsters need cartoons and You Tube to keep things on their level, but the facts are quite different.

Trump has a long series of bad deals, failed ventures, unpaid bills, and screwed investors. You won't be able to find anyone who has done business with him twice.

But it you want to learn something, try this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...6fda6b404c7_story.html?utm_term=.0820d6bcb942

 

Russians + American (formerly patriotic, now oddly pro-Russian) conservatives vs the justice system and the rest of America.

It's a funny old game that the Russians and Trumpians are playing.

 

You're still trying to pretend that I said that Mueller had to trick him because they don't have anything on Trump.

I never said that, no matter how much you twist yourself in knots trying to put those words in my mouth.

We don't know what Mueller has. But it's fairly certain that he has a lot, and has had almost since day one. It isn't as if Trump and the clowns around him don't leave broad trails.

The rules of the Republican primaries were the ones that allowed him to amass delegates in states he didn't win majorites in, He got all the delegates, with 40% of the vote.

 

Well sir, as soon as you made the absurd claim that trump has not been successful, and I look at his assets and lifestyle compared to mine, middle class, well, I can only shake my head and figure you are playing games here. Not at all serious. No one could logically and rationally utter what you did, and so that only leaves games.

Owing money to russian banks is not the same as being owned by russians, lock, stock and barrel. For being owned by russians, you mean he is under the control of russia. And since you cannot back that up with evidence, you cannot prove it, your game playing also involves pulling stuff out of your arse. Ha ha. I do not intend this as a personal insult, as I am only noting what reality is. Anyone can see it.

You got it bad man, really bad. You are blowing up BS detectors, and they are so hard to replace with wages from service sector work. ha ha

 

Can someone remind me what FACTS were used to start the collusion investigation into Trump and Russia. The best I can remember is after we were told by Obama that its' impossible to hack and election and then told by Clinton that questioning the results of an election was unpatriotic, the day after the election out from Clinton's camp were stories about rigging and collusion, I just don't seem to remember what FACTS this investigation is based upon.

Can someone refresh my memory please.

 

You can't see the connection? Blinded by TDS I guess.

 

I believe it was a FISA warrant based on a Clinton Campaign opposition research piece which has largely been debunked.

"A federal judge Friday accused special counsel Robert Mueller's team of using criminal charges to squeeze former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort to get his help in possibly either prosecuting or impeaching President Donald Trump, multiple reports said."

They are slowly rooting the Clintonistas out of the FBI and I think you'll see some indictments by September. I think Sessions needs to fire Rosenstein and then resign. Sessions still being there effectively puts a Clintonista in charge of the Mueller investigation.

 

Utterly ridiculous, on its face. It is the entire basis of the Witch Hunt, until the conspirators decided that they could "investigate Trump forever, in search of a crime, a blatant violation of the SC rules, the DOJ rules, and the US Constituion's 4th Amendment.

 

In fairness, Obama was everyone's *****.

 

Then what 'trickery" are you referring to? Why is any 'trickery necessary? Do you acknowledge you used the world trickery?

Why is it ''fairly certain'? Are you believing this in good faith, based only on your dislike of the President?

The rules were the same for everyone. You're not an American but if you live in the UK, Canada, Australia or several other countries you'll know they all have their version of the Electoral College.

 

Hillary Clinton said that questioning the results of an election are "horrifying", and actually told the truth.

And this is the guy now leading the investigation of the President.

 

Yeah, as this was the entire basis of his foreign policy: