Senate committee verifies Bobulinski materials reviewed so far

Lol...that's what they've been doing for 4 years. The trumps are grifters.

 

I don't believe wild nonsensical ridiculous conspiracy theories. I doubt you do, either, so the question of being honest with oneself is on you my friend.

 

Nope they have been carrying on their open businesses that existed long before he even announced he was running and no evidence they were selling influence or access. So try again with the specious diversions.

So you are OK with corruption at the highest level and will not complain if Trump wins and his sons and daughter start selling access and secretly holding money for their dad when he leaves office?

 

Your "point" that the entire "FAKE Laptop BS" is a Ludicrous Conspiracy?

That Ludicrous "Laptop Conspiracy" was Destroyed-- even BEFORE Tucker "Lost" the Non-Existent Documents.

Nobody (outside of the 1/4 of America inside the Faux/Trump Bubble) ever cared (in the first place).

^The fact that those 1/4 of Americans are disproportionately overrepresented online changes nothing.

The Entire "Laptop" thing is FAKE BS. Period.

3/4 of America could not care less (or haven't even heard) about "The Laptop".

In terms of moving the Electoral Needle, it is a Complete NON-Issue.

Nobody is buying the "Laptop" BS . Back to the drawing board.

Glad to be of help.

 

Have the Biden's denied it? We have two NAMED witnesses with the documents to back them up, on what basis do you dismiss it out of hand?

 

So you think Ole Joe got rich off his 48 year senate salary. I guess that says alot...

 

The basis is Partisanship.

 

I don't care how Joe and Jill got rich. I hear it's from book sales mostly. Same place lots of people get rich. Speeches, as well. Former vice-presidents can fetch a good fee.

Thing is, if I ever get the desire to look into Joe Biden's finances, I can. Since you're the one interested in his wealth, why don't you find his tax returns and let me know, k?

 

um, other then the eyewitness that was the business partner saying that's who the Big Guy is? Yeah... I mean direct evidence is not a shred of evidence.

 

The left used to be revolutionary. Now the left is the state. How ironic.

 

That's unproven assertion and I don't have a problem with a trademark on her purses and other products she has been selling for years and applying every year. They were not phony business deals she is QUITE adept in her businesses and that probably includes how to apply for her yearly trademarks to protect her products from pirating. This was NOT those governments handing her cash for nothing.

 

I don’t believe the BS you’re so breathlessly peddling.

They don’t need to deny claims that are so obviously ridiculous and full of holes.

Even Trumpsters ought to feel as though their intelligence is being insulted.

But, I guess you guys would rather make fools of yourselves by falling for this amateurish slap together nonsense.

 

OK I see your still doing your best Bagdad Bob impression....

 

Talk about the BS here. I have posted nothing but the facts while you are making specious claims that it is ridiculous and full of holes. It is YOUR intelligence that is being insulted by the MSM and Joe Biden and you seem content to allow them to do so.

We have the written evidence, we have the NAMED credible sources, and we have NO DENIALS by the Bidens.................so what is the basis for your dismissals out of hand?

Agains

So you are OK that the Biden's were selling influence and access and enriching themselves on Joe's position as President and the likelihood they will do it again.

And if you try to claim they were not doing so then post their denial that it is Hunters laptop and statement that the emails are fake else you have nothing.

 

Why do you claim it is a conspiracy "theory", on what basis do you dismiss out of hand the HARD evidence which we have?

 

The term the big guy is ambiguous it's clear from Chicowboys post that's what they were talking about.......

 

So, you weren't being honest with yourself. It was kinda obvious. Just like this whole keystone cops fake scandal.

 

10 percent for the Big Guy isn't ambiguous...it's clear they are talking about Big Guy Biden...the head of the family syndicate

 

Tax returns don't show wealth.

You can look at his public fin disclousures...just like President Trump's...but the point of money laundering is to make it appear the money is clean...that's why the FBI is looking into the Bidens about now...so we'll see

 

The. Term. "The big guy"...... no its vague

 

Not when you say the Big Guy is getting 10 percent...pretty on the mark. They know the person, and the amount his to be kicked back.

You don't give vague people a 10 percent cut

Additionally we have an eyewitness to all this saying specifically who the person is

 

Oh come on now, we're talkin' about people who still light candles and burn incense under Obama's picture....

 

This. And it's not necessarily about Joe Biden per se but more about the process. The DNC was obligated to vet its candidate, Congress was obligated to vet the totality of the evidence when they put us through that ridiculous utter farce, preventing us from getting ahead of the coronavirus.

But instead of getting that evidence either as the DNC committee or through that shitshow, they literally sat on this for months, MONTHS. The anti-orange man bad crew could've put this guy in and the best thing they can say now is "Well, at least he can't be blackmailed by it."

The point is that you vet it to make sure if disqualifying, the candidate doesn't get the job or that you're aware of it.

 

there is no current investigation into money laundering involving the Bidens.

sorry.

 

....while reading the Steele Dossier under that candlelight........touche'