Senate committee verifies Bobulinski materials reviewed so far

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Talon, Oct 29, 2020.

  1. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,218
    Likes Received:
    39,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And how on earth do you know that?

    Laptop connected to Hunter Biden linked to FBI money laundering probe

    The FBI’s subpoena of a laptop and hard drive purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden came in connection with a money laundering investigation in late 2019, according to documents obtained by Fox News and verified by multiple federal law enforcement officials who reviewed them.
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/laptop-hunter-biden-linked-fbi-money-laundering-probe

    Sorry :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2020
  2. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,904
    Likes Received:
    32,626
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have the Bidens denied the Bat Boy/Ivanka Sex Tape?

    Some "Chinese guy on the internet" said it was on The Laptop.

    ^Gotta be True.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2020
    TomFitz likes this.
  3. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well the FBI disagrees
     
  4. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    16,069
    Likes Received:
    7,596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The exoneration was not based on evidence, it was purely down party lines. The Republicans all but said how they were going to vote before the trial even happened. Everyone knew how it was going to work, and no surprise, it worked exactly that way.

    I think it's a valid point about whether Trump's actions rose to the level of needing to be removed entirely from office. The Republicans could have voted to censure him as an alternative. Instead, they let him off entirely. There were no repercussions for a man abusing his office to find dirt on a political opponent and then lying about it to everybody. I would have settled for censure. They were able to do it to Clinton, and what he did was far less corrupt. He lied, certainly. Trump lied AND abused the power of his office. Clinton deserved to be censured for perjury. And Trump deserved, at minimum, to be censured for his deeds in Ukraine.

    The problem with the entire thing was not that the Democrats weren't justified in what they did over what happend with Ukraine, it was that they had spent every second before that became known trying to get to the point of impeachment before they had anything solid to get there with.

    In all honesty, the Democrats don't deserve to win in this election. I hope they don't win the Senate. They chose to oppose a man like Trump by being just as childish and stupid as he is, instead of opting to be the adults in the room. If they have both houses of Congress, I expect them to act just as smug and domineering as the Republicans did when they had both houses.

    But Trump absolutely deserves to lose. He's got to go, and with a little luck, he will.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2020
  5. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    one witness? equals hearsay.

    doesnt hold up in court
     
  6. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    please point to the actual statement from the FBI, naming the agent, saying that the Bidens are being investigated for money laundering.
     
  7. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,885
    Likes Received:
    16,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Repeating allegations from trashy tabloids and Trump’s minions isn’t “presenting facts”
     
  8. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This nonsense is like riding the Scrambler "till you drop," on a dare. Let's get off and rehash for a moment.

    The Post story broke 16 days ago. Nothing has come of it, except more dizzying Scrambler runs. That's not the point, though. The point is that Mac Isaac was not identified in the Post story. Why was that, I wonder? Well, some very smart journalists tracked him down. It seems the Post was amateur and sloppy. So hasty and confident they forgot to hide some important things. Big dummies, at the Post.

    Once Mac Isaac was tracked down, he gave inconsistent answers, said his life was in danger, shared his love of Trump and desire to rescue him from impeachment, and then when asked about Giuliani, he clammed up.

    Oh...ah ha...I get it! That's why the Post didn't identify him! Anything after that can be dismissed as the propaganda it is, and as we can see, over the last 16 days, that's what American people have done with it.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2020
  9. ronv

    ronv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Messages:
    20,312
    Likes Received:
    8,774
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How did this one turn out for you?
     
  10. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    53,615
    Likes Received:
    49,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What a great question....

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is unclear, at this point, whether the investigation is ongoing or if it was directly related to Hunter Biden


    .....says your article
     
  12. HTownMarine

    HTownMarine Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    8,348
    Likes Received:
    4,155
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll bet any amount of money the FBI investigation into Hunter Biden doesn't stop...

    How much you willing to put up?
     
  13. HTownMarine

    HTownMarine Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    8,348
    Likes Received:
    4,155
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because those companies aren't American.

    Hope I cleared up your confusion.
     
  14. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't care about Hunter Biden. The bet I'll offer you, at 10-1 odds, is that whatever Hunter Biden may be involved in, if anything, Joe Biden took no part in it.
     
    ronv likes this.
  15. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,218
    Likes Received:
    39,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    FBI Investigating Hunter Biden for Money Laundering: Report

    The FBI opened an investigation into Hunter Biden and associates in 2019 on suspicion of money laundering, a Justice Department official told Sinclair Broadcasting.

    The criminal investigation is ongoing, the DOJ official said.
    https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-investigating-hunter-biden-money-222323906.html

    Why are you in such denial about this?

    Have the Bidens stated the emails are fake, the laptop is not Hunters and Bobulinski is lying? No. It's implied guilt. Why do you dismiss the evidence out of hand.
     
  16. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,218
    Likes Received:
    39,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    On what basis are you denying the evidence otherwise?
     
  17. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,218
    Likes Received:
    39,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    On what basis do you dismiss out of have the fact that one of the several NAMED SOURCES went to the FBI and under threat of perjury, giving false statements and obstruction of justice gave testimony verifying the emails, who was involved including Joe and provided forensic evidence of that? On what basis do you dismiss the veracity of the emails? On what basis do you dismiss the laptop belonging to Hunter.

    Have the Bidens stated the emails are false and the laptop not Hunter's is that where you get that?
     

Share This Page