Shapiro Gets Into Tense Back-and-Forth With Pro-Choice Student

Where is the hypocrisy?

IF you understood "consent" then you would know what you're talking about...

 

Nothing silly about the facts it is a human from the moment of conception and a baby, the silliness is denying the facts so you can support the mother killing it.

 

I guess it escapes you we are talking human life and "human" will have to be used every time else you get confused?

 

Nope but you can move them off your property. If they die later, that is on them, not you.

 

I never understood the irrationality of the righties who want to ban abortion shutting clinics that provide accessible , affordable, safe birth control.

I never understood people who want to start wars that kill actual people, innocent children and pregnant women...but they do.


I never understood the irrationality and stupidity of those who want to ban abortion but HATE the thought of one of their pennies going to social programs which help CHILDREN.

How COLD blooded.

No "child" is killed in an abortion...only in the minds of those frightened by science and facts and think they can win using emotional crap.

 

Killing is still killing, any way you want to cut it. The baby is still dead irrespective of whether you chose to target it in particular. The culpability is exactly the same, becasue you know going in ahead if time that bystanders will be killed. If I start shooting into the air, and a bullet comes down and strikes a baby by "accident" I will still be culpable, even if I did not intentionally target the baby in particular.

Furthermore, you cannot supply evidence that conclusively demonstrates life starts at conception, because there is no such evidence, and you know it.

 

Men get to make their decisions prior to having a sexual interaction. If males do not mate according to who will be a good mother to their child, they don't get to have a say after the fact.

This is an important aspect of marriage. Most women who marry fully intend to carry their husbands' children, and there is no particular reason why the rest of us should have to pay taxes so a child of a single mother can be cared for.

 

So you advocate for abortion because you hate children

You only want taxes to pay for your preferences.

 

I'll answer: Not every murderer is sentenced to the DP. Some are sentenced to Life, some are sentenced even less than that. So, we'll probably get to the point: What should a woman be sentenced to, for an abortion?

Okay, I'll be honest: If we went down this route, we'd end up being North Korea. So no, it's not desirable to have an incarceration for abortion. In fact, if such a policy were enacted we'd be hearing "cries" about violating women's rights, and through those cries a new liberation of "woman's freedom" everywhere.

How about we embrace the policies of Communist China? Recently revoked in 2015(after being criticized by Madam Clinton, your presumptive nominee), the one-child policy restricted families to ONE child. I myself didn't like the policies, but if we restrict them exclusively to women who opt for the "pro-choice" crowd, it should be okay.

 

Since when is not killing something being a "slave" to it?

 

Not having the choice whether to kill it or keep it is slavery.

Forcing women to stay pregnant and give birth is slavery.

Giving the fetus "super" rights over women is slavery.

 

Then all parenthood is slavery. The ultimate
logic of your position is parents have the right to kill their children whenever they tire of their "slavery".

And killing the unborn is murder. Murder lasts forever. This so called "slavery" lasts only a few months.

No more than letting real slave owners kill their "property" with legal blessings.

 

You have provided no facts that prove the single human cell at conception is a human.

 

A sperm is human life and it exists prior to conception.

 

Are you a supporter of Obamacare or universal healthcare?
How dare anyone tell anyone else what to do with their body, right?

 

That's the Darwinian way. IMO it is unwise to enhance reproduction possibilities in a non-Darwinian way. It leads to increasingly dysfunctional people.

And yes, I am against my taxes being used in ways that will deteriorate the gene pool any further than we already do with our modern medicine, motorized vehicles, etc etc.

Additionally, I do dislike and choose not to be around rude, stupid children, and for that reason alone I do not wish to pay to support bastards. If a woman is rude and stupid enough to expect me to pay to raise her child by an anonymous other, I have little hope that her offspring will be much different, especially since the child also has an obviously selfish and unreliable father.

The main life task of a woman is to assume the best genetic makeup for her child/ren that she can. However, in the lower sections of our society devolution , enhanced by drugs , seems the order of the day. Our welfare policies have been contributory to this disgusting stare of affairs.

 

I used to be totally against abortion.
Then I realized WTF, not all, but the majority of women getting them were liberals.

 

There's so many things wrong with that post it should be made into a shrine for bigotry, sexism, class hate, 150 year old ideas, and colossal lack of knowledge of history.

 

Got stats?

 

So you like being told what you can do or not do with your body ...? ..Or you don't? Hard to tell....

 

....How in the hell are some of you arguing that abortion should be considered manslaughter? There's all kinds of premeditation involved in an abortion, especially in placed that require expecting mothers to looking at a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing ultrasound. Are you guys just creating positions on the fly?

 

Do you support mandatory vaccines?

Do you support drinking or smoking ages?