South Africa on brink of ‘ANARCHY’ as president demands white farmers’ land is SEIZED<<MOD WARNING>>

If that was the case, then they should destroy the institutions and perks put in by the Boers as well, and turn it back into what it was originally. The blacks shouldn't stop with the farms, they should confiscate the stores and companies as well.

This reminds me of Egypt when Nassar came in, and gave the Egyptians back their 'pride'. The country prospered under British laws, and it was packed with foreigners - so he kicked them out. The beautiful homes were taken over by the locals, and ten years later they were slums.

The motto here is that you gain nothing from passions and resentments. All it does is give rise to manipulation and demagoguery - you end up worse than before.

 

Wow... I haven’t heard a whiff about that... will check it out!

 

Russian east was always pretty much empty land. All of russia really is is the European part. Everything else is like northern Canada.

 

Anything’ better than apartheid. Famine is better than apartheid. Mass graves are better than apartheid. Being another shithole banana republic is better than apartheid.

 

And these pathetically small orable patch of land fed all of South Africa when White farmers worked it. How did they do it?

 

It was the reaches, prosperous country on the continent, the only 2nd world country there... far from being destroyed. It is being destroyed now.

 

Yes during WWII, but in Ukraine we support them.

You're living in la-la land. We are not fighting Islam, we are fighting Christianity. Specifically Orthodox Christianity the way the Bolsheviks did in Russia - and it's all for Soros' liberal one world order.

In Kosovo we supported the Islamic KLA terrorists, even though they were killing and selling Serb body parts. Nato watched them as they destroyed over 100 ancient monasteries and churches. Today Soros backs Muslim Albania's expansion into parts of Greece, Serbia, and Montenegro - all Orthodox countries.

In Ukraine the Orthodox Churches and monasteries are being confiscated, and given over to an unrecognized pseudo hierarch without a peep from Washington or the MSM.

In Syria we support Al Nusra/Al Queda who make a habit of beheading Orthodox Syrians. Fighting terrorists is the excuse Washington uses for being in Syria, as it tries to get rid of President Assad and destroy Damascus. Damascus is where all the Christians ran for refuge.

The enemy is not Russia, it is Christian Russia.

 

Certainly. No wonder, China eyes it with envy.

 

This is going on in S Africa, not the U.S. It is none of our business.

 

Russia has a problem from what I can tell. If it opened its borders, it would be swarmed with people from the Central Asian States, and yet it needs to populate Siberia. This is probably why they started the homestead act, and are giving away free land to Russians and Slavs, including Poles, who want to retain their heritage, provided that they utilize it and not sell it for five years. There is no infrastructure though, kind of like the US was at one time.

As for the S. Africans, they are moving into southern Russia and buying land. Probably large tracts of land, and are opening an immigration office - I guess for the rest to come.

 

It many not be a large part of the economy, but it is a vital one. People need food. If it craps out they'll be hell to pay.

 

No. Read the HISTORY. The Whites, Middle-Easterners, Indians, etc., came in and "set up shop", so to speak.

The Black tribes were curious about these people and what they were doing. They saw all the new 'features and benefits' that the recent arrivals had with them, and what they were doing. The Blacks very simply, and understandably, 'wanted in' on the new foreign settlements and developments. The Blacks, themselves, "brought nothing to the party" but the ability to provide physical labor, but this they did and they worked for wages and/or other compensation, living in completely separate communities.

Really, the native Black Africans had nothing in common with the other people. Sub-Saharan Blacks had been living in the ancient human past that had, at its best, risen to the Iron Age (imported from other far more advanced societies), but mostly, African Blacks lived at the level of the Stone Age....

In essence, although that is a simplified explanation, that is how things went in South Africa for hundreds of years -- until Blacks were much more recently brought into the midst of the modern South African White developments, economy, government, etc.

Now look where everything has gone. South African Blacks are preparing to seize virtually everything that South African Whites own, beginning with White private property, and will probably run nearly all of them out of their own country before long. Is that fair? I truly believe that anyone who would say that is 'fair' is surely the biggest racist of all!

 

ROUGH!

 

So, unable to do anything else, the liberal, Leftist faction goes from defending what the Black Hitler is doing in South Africa, to splatter-screening everybody who disagrees with 'race cards', and finally, deflecting the whole thing away by saying, "it is none of our business."

THAT, sir, is the position that "the West" took as the German Nazis killed Jews and other they hated, stole everything they owned, and forced them to get out of their own country!

Being someone who defends creatures like "Rammy" Ramaphosa and "Juju" Malema and their thieving, murdering thugs must be a bizarre experience for the hyperliberal Leftists who are much more comfortable bitching and complaining about the VERY SAME kind of INJUSTICE when it is applied to people other than Whites....

"Hypocrite, thy name is Democrat!"

 

For Pete's sake. Beat up on us when when we act like the world's police force and then beat up on us when we don't. It is none of our business.

 

Yeah but if Ramaphosa was white and he was going to change to the constitution so that black people's land could be stolen then all the libs would be raising holy hell.

 

What do you mean... "if" that was the case.
How on earth is it not the case that white people thieved about all the land there is in South Africa destroying the fabric of a nation?

This is even dumber than holocaust denialism.

 

It's not vital, because you can just BUY food, when you make money elsewhere. And I've shown, they make most of their money elsewhere.

 

pfff... they ran them from their properties to eventually installed apartheid law. That fits the "a government adopts a program in which ANY of its citizens can be ROBBED -- LEGALLY, purely because of the color of their skin, the fabric of that nation is destroyed.".. perfectly. That's their history. You go prove me otherwise with what you mean with "set up shop". Such a play of words.... meaningless bullcrap.

 

Let's assume you are a person who simply doesn't care for the suffering of other people, okay? Let's look at naked self-interest.

What happens in South America is "none of our business" too. You just have millions of hungry Hispanics pouring over your borders.
What China does is "none of our business" but they are swallowing up your jobs, your technology and seizing the initiative in the South China Seas and the Pacific to take control over what was America's sphere of influence.

As it is - what happens in the world IS America's business because it relies on world peace, global trade, secure borders, technology sharing, markets, rule of law and so on.

 

As in, say, mining? If you take a white man's property,
what is to stop you taking a white man's mine?

 

Has nothing to do with farms not being vital.

 

Many of these so-call indigenous people were themselves occupiers of land not their own.
In particular the Bantu (of which genealogy I am a part of)
The issue for SA is NOT who owned what and where and when, but what sort of future you
want your country to have. Doing the Zimbabwe/Venezuela thing is going to destroy a lot of
human lives.

 

They arrived there 300 AD. That's on par with the Great Migration period in Europe. So I'm going to dismiss this utterly silly excuse.

Seems obviously they are going to erase what white people gained under apartheid rule and before.
And that is morally completely justified.