Steve King questions if there would be any population left if not for rape and incest

So, according to your post, Republican politicians shouldn't be held accountable, the stupid things they say should be hushed up........….OK, I got it...

Obviously the dolts who elected him took him seriously.

 

Dude REALLY puts the OOOOOP in Stoopid!

 

Rape, Incest & the health of the mother.
In my eyes as someone who is pro life, I would agree abortion should only be used only in those cases.

 

I am pro life, but I see abortion as an option only for rape, incest, or the health of the mother.

This idiot King is not running for president and his nutty view should not be compared to the POTUS candidates, because he is not running for president.

I am far more worried about the Democrats love ❤️ of late term abortions and desire to allow a mother to have the baby killed who survive a botched abortion and are breathing on their own.

Murder should never be an option because the baby is inconvenient.

 

Ok at least you recognize or agree that there are good reasons for abortions which are acceptable to you. So if a women has an abortion because she could die otherwise the baby is not murdered?

 

OK I'll bite. What is factually incorrect about this statement?

"What if we went back through all the family trees and just pulled those people out that were products of rape and incest? Would there be any population of the world left if we did that?"

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Can you explain being "Pro-Life" but supporting abortion for rape and incest?

How is the fetus caused by rape different from a fetus caused by consensual sex?


The abortion procedure for either is EXACTLY the same with the same outcome.

WHY are you bringing this up AGAIN if you can't address the questions in the post of mine you quoted???

I didn't say he was running for President. Why don't you address what was IN THE POST of mine you quoted?

He IS a representative of Republicans and Americans...

There is no "murder" in abortion.....

If you think there is then WHY TF do you want to allow it in the case of rape?????

Babies that are born with gross deformities and not expected to live without suffering are killed to be humane...…...only a fiend would want them to die a lingering, painful death when death is certain.

 

Can you explain being "Pro-Life" but supporting abortion for rape and incest?

How is the fetus caused by rape different from a fetus caused by consensual sex?


The abortion procedure for either is EXACTLY the same with the same outcome.

 

King and Trump are the GOP

 

Very weird statement to make ... Perhaps he was taken out of context.

 

Absolutely.

 

No, he wasn't.

 

Trump-King 2020!!!!!

 

That fact should be an embarrassment to ALL Republicans but it is not.

 

Gather around. This what happens when you guzzle Trump's rally kool aid.

 

In the future just ask the question. Your post above this one looks like it was done by Rosannne Rosanadana .

My personal opinion....

I am pro life - I am against abortion except for cases of incest and rape, or the health of the mother “her life is at stake”.

That is my view and it is echoed by many and does not require your approval.

I am also the guy who calls people who support late term abortions baby killers.

Yes, i believe it is ok to terminate a pregnancy from rape. It is acceptable because the women has already gone through enough hell and the
Pregnancy was not her fault. She did not willingly spread her legs.

On the other hand killing a baby that is breathing on his own after surviving a late term abortion is clearly murder in my eyes.

If you can’t see the difference, I can’t help you.

 

So who is your democratic presidential candidate of choice?

The party of illegals and boy who cried wolf racist cries, currently have no alternative.

If Bill Clinton was running - He would get my
Vote, but all these lemmings running in 2020 have gone off the deep end

Who is your candidate & please don’t say Oprah or Michelle Obama..... They both have said - They are not running.

 

You onboard with the Green New Deal ?
How about open borders?
You think Illegals should get free health care and college?
Who is your presidential candidate?

So which Lemming are you following off the cliff?

 

This is a lie Democrats aren't any better....... Omar, Ralph Northam, Justin Fairfax, Keith Ellison

 

All that you have is "Whataboutism"?

But, I do understand why so many RWs are defending the conduct of this TOP Republican who (to most Americans) is THE FACE OF THE GOP.

No wonder the RW is bending over backwards to defend him. :smh:

 

We have a very good argument, that being that when an ovum is implanted with a sperm cell, it becomes a new human being, with its own DNA. Approximately 50% of the time, it will have a blood type different from its mother. Snuffing it out, whatever term you want to politely call it, is snuffing out that human being. Modern medical science being what it is, if you don't snuff it out intentionally, there's a 75% chance that human being will come to term as a living, breathing baby. (About 1/4 of all pregnancies end in natural abortion or stillbirths.)

That's rich, accusing Republicans of hyper-emotionalism when that's all Democrats have, on immigration, gun control, welfare, health care, etc. "Won't someone think of the children!?!" Yes, let's think of the children and not snuff them out in the womb.

The threat to a woman's life as a result of pregnancy is overstated.

"In addition, over 1000 medical providers have signed the Dublin Declaration, which affirms that abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of the mother.

As experienced practitioners and researchers in obstetrics and gynecology, we affirm that direct abortion – the purposeful destruction of the unborn child – is not medically necessary to save the life of a woman. We hold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion, and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatment results in the loss of life of her unborn child. We confirm that the prohibition of abortion does not affect, in any way, the availability of optimal care to pregnant women.

Understanding that the baby may not survive post delivery does not necessitate ending the baby’s life intentionally prior to delivery. The goal is to attempt to save both lives, not to intentionally end the baby’s life to save the mother."

https://www.liveaction.org/news/abortion-life-health-mother/

We could ban all abortions tomorrow and no woman's life would be lost due to complications from pregnancy.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Can you explain being "Pro-Life" but supporting abortion for rape and incest?

How is the fetus caused by rape different from a fetus caused by consensual sex?


The abortion procedure for either is EXACTLY the same with the same outcome.

AWWW, you couldn't address the post NO other Anti-Choicer could ever could either.


But quit using silly flimsy excuses..... They were simple straightforward questions.



They are against abortion but FLIP FLOP when it comes to abortion due to rape.


There is NO logic to that except ,as you go on to say, women MUST BE PUNISHED FOR HAVING CONSENSUAL SEX BUT WOMEN WHO WERE FORCED TO HAVE SEX CAN "MURDER" THEIR BABY.

And proof follows..

.

It's NOT about a "baby" being murdered for you . Right there. (I made it blue to stand out), it shows the only interest is PUNISHING WOMEN FOR HAVING SEX.


.

If you can't see that your opinion doesn't matter to anyone else , I can't help you ...

 

I wonder when Anti-Choicers will ever notice that FORCING women to use their body against their will as a rapist does is so like FORCING women to use their body to gestate as Anti-Choicers want to do.

 

So easy to not care when it isn't you.


From wiki: ""Although the United States was spending more on healthcare than any other country in the world, more than two women died during childbirth every day, making maternal mortality in the United States the highest when compared to 49 other countries in the developed world.[3] The CDC reported an increase in the maternal mortality ratio in the United States from 18.8 deaths per 100,000 births to 23.8 deaths per 100,000 births between 2000 and 2014, a 26.6% increase;[4] It is estimated that 20-50% of these deaths are due to preventable causes, such as: hemorrhage, severe high blood pressure, and infection.[5]

 

yep, I am sure he thought it sounded perfect in his mind, then when he said it out loud everyone got a peek into his mind