I'm in the process of actually reading the report not just take the word of news casters and It is chalk for of reference of bias personal bias against Trump and the urge of keeping him form becoming president and removing from office when he won
And here I thought it was going to blow the lid off the deep state and lead to criminal convictions. But no, just more investigations because you didn't get them this time. Better luck next time.
Two more ongoing IG investigations. This report will result in at least five investigations into some of the players. Takes awhile to uncover the abuse in departments that want this to go away.
Ah... we trust you guys to accurately summarize the crushing of several pipe dreams.. just make sure and post page numbers, in case we need to double check you...
Love reading...not 560 pages of government language however... maybe they can get John Sandford to punch it up a bit? I might get to the exec summary over the weekend, but only at bedtime...
3 hours ago Embed STEALTH JEFF @drawandstrike Follow Read on Twitter 565 subscribers Anybody who thought Horowitz was going to release a "burn this motherf**ker DOWN!!!" report today had unrealistic expectations. He's an internal review guy. MOST of the bad actors already were fired or resigned. They aren't IN the DOJ anymore. Horowitz's main job is to square a circle. It's impossible. He has to expose the corruption & show it to the public while making sure he doesn't irreparably damage the DOJ or the FBI so that they can't function during the rest of Trump's 2 terms. I spent all day yesterday saying don't expect indictments today. Those of you endlessly @ing me about where Comey/McCabe's/Yates indictments are, that's not Horowitz's job. Huber is handling the CRIMINAL side of this & you won't hear BOO until he's ready. No leaks, NOTHING. What I expected was referrals, and there are 5 referrals to the OPR for violating internal FBI/DOJ procedures. Apparently, 5 people still inside the FBI didn't get the hint and abscond yet so they will end up like McCabe. Horowitz is going to testify at least twice before Congress. The public and the media is going to be focused on what he found for the next several weeks. Especially once people like Strzok & Lisa Page & others are subpoenaed to come testify. Protecting the institutions while exposing the people who corrupted it and are still influencing it, that's some tightrope to walk. More has to come to light & the public has to be 'read' into it before the big dropping of the hammer with the Trump FISA/Spying report. Horowitz protected the institution while putting out a report that made it blatant just how bad the politically motivated bias was in this MYE investigation. He put MORE evidence of that bias out there. No matter what his summation says. So he can SHOW the public how bad it was, but he won't do it in a way that would compromise the ability of the institutions to do their jobs. Huber will come in for the clean up when he's ready. He's on his own timetable & Horowitz/Huber people don't leak, no idea when. As a matter of fact, today in his statement about this report, Sessions made it a point to remind everybody Huber is out there.
Don't believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn't find bias. He very carefully says that he found no "documentary" evidence that bias produced "specific investigatory decisions." That's different. It means he didn't catch anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down that they took a specific step to aid a candidate. You know, like: "Let's give out this Combetta immunity deal so nothing comes out that will derail Hillary for President." But he in fact finds bias everywhere. The examples are shocking and concerning, and he devotes entire sections to them. And he very specifically says in the summary that they "cast a cloud" on the entire "investigation's credibility." That's pretty damning. No bias? Then why this? Like Starbucks? FBI orders bias training for employees after latest embarrassing emails - Washington Times
Key points from this report: Comey screwed Hillary His decision not to prosecute was correct Lynch and bill didn’t discuss anything improper No evidence any bias influenced the investigation
Because the texts and leaking looked bad. It doesn’t mean the investigation was affected. And yes the lack of proof just means there’s no proof, I don’t expect you to be swayed by a complete lack of evidence to support your conspiracy theory lol
They definitely need to clean house. Too many obama hold overs. Drain the Swamp! I got a good chuckle when I read where Comey claimed he did not know Huma was married to Wiener. That was comedy gold!