Suspect In House IT Security Probe Also Had Access to DNC Emails

I could swear I already gave this a BWAHAHAHAHA but in any case...

Neither site is a reference site. The first is the home to a racist Islamaphobe and the second marks the claim as an "UNPROVEN CONSPIRACY THEORY"

 

No, they're not true. At best supposition based on bigoted assumptions all of which have been shown to be unfounded.

 

Since I've made none, don't need your help. Now perhaps you could help correct your own errors?

 

You don't know, then, that three Muslim brothers working for Democrat members of the House intelligence committee were fired for security reasons.

 

"Five House staffers are accused of stealing equipment from members’ offices without their knowledge and committing serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network, according to multiple sources briefed on the investigation."

Not "security" reasons but for stealing and unauthorized computer access. But because they're Muslims it must be a terrorist thing, right?

 

What sort of "serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network" do you imagine if not stealing information?

Very likely a terrorist connection. They are Muslims, after all.

How is this "unfounded?" Seems very "founded" to me.

 

As noted, unfounded except among racist Islamaphobes.

 

It's not like Muslims have given us or anybody else any trouble before. Right?

Here are these sleeze bags stealing equipment and information from the US government. What are they going to do with it? Sell it of course. Who to? Pakistani intelligence. Maybe Iranian intelligence.

No, they wouldn't do that! They're Muslims, for crying out loud! It is racist to even think otherwise!

I am sure the Democrats felt very politically correct giving Muslims the passwords to the House Intelligent Committee data. We are not racists! Just damn fools.

 

And your entire basis for suspicion is racist.

 

So what? That doesn't mean they are inaccurate.

When I see a group of Chinese people talking among themselves, I suspect they are speaking Chinese.

That is racist, too, but an awfully good bet.

When Muslims are caught stealing information from the House Intelligence Committee, it is a pretty good bet they are aiding and abetting Muslim groups that are hostile to US interests.

 

Your assumptions based on Racism? Of course it means they're incorrect. Just like every racist stereotype.

 

Not buying the theory these guys are responsible. Makes no sense at all. But it wasn't a Russian hack which was turned over to wilkileaks either. It was either a DNC employee, who had access, or it was a prior NSA employee or employees that got the emails, and turned them over to wilkileaks. Ambassador Murray knows who it is, and it was not Russia, for Russia does not leave fingerprints. The MSM black out of murray should tell one it was not Russia, but some of us are like Forest Gump and a bit dense, not mentally up to the challenge of sorting the bullcrap from the pearls.

 

Nonsense. Racist stereotypes are very often correct.

That's how they became stereotypes in the first place.

 

No they are quite friendly with Democrats and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

 

That is what racists believe.

 

And back to the crazy logic from earlier.

 

And they are correct in their recognition that stereotypes are constructed from long experience.

 

Actually "long experience" kills stereotypes because experience teach that stereotypes are, in fact, lies.

 

Not in my experience, just the reverse, in fact. I bought the liberal lie that Blacks and Whites were equal. Then I met some Black people.

 

You are what you are. Ignorance is the source of bigotry.

 

Not in my experience, as I've already told you.

For me to assert that the races are equal would be an act of intellectual dishonesty on my part.

 

Assert what you like.

Doesn't change what you are and that "experience" has taught you nothing.

 

Shrug. I prefer experience to politically correct dogma. It appears you do not.

You are the one that sees five fingers even though O'Brian is holding up only four.

 

Shrug. I prefer experience to politically correct dogma. It appears you do not.

You are the one that sees five fingers even though O'Brian is holding up only four.

[/QUOTE]

See? That's the difference between us. I would never say you're a racist and I would never accuse you of being like every other racist. I understand that every racist is unique. Some want to kill "them." Some just want to run "them" out of the country. And the more understanding just want to make sure "they" stay on "their" side of town and in "their" schools.

 

Heck, that is no difference. I would never say you are a racist either.

But I do say that O'Brian is holding up four fingers. You say he is holding up five, and you really believe he is holding up five.

That is the difference between us. I base my opinions on experience, you base them on the party line.