The bible never mentioned any east asian or blacks.

Or Rome, Georgia.

 

lol!!!

baseless nonsense

 

I'm sure if they were it would say so in the writings.
They have no problem identifying black people.

 

he just writes baseless black-supremacist garbage.

nothing more.

 

That's not true. They knew about Persia, Egypt.

Some scolars think the original hebrews might have been black themselves, since Abraham and Lot traveled east, through egypt, to get to the middle east, meaning they came from africa.

 

I've heard this before, but a person can tell what race the people who wrote the bible are.

It would be the only race not spoken of.

 

Black was sub-Sahara Africa. Northern Africa was Mediterranean
and nobody can prove Abraham and Lot existed at all.

 

The Queen of Sheba was likely black, and introduced the faith of God to her people, so there.

 

Possible, she was in a black neighborhood, but her race isn't mentioned, where it is mentioned with others.

 

So what?

 

According to Psalms 45:2, the Messiah is "fairer than the children of men".
Lamentations 4:7 says "Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk."

 

Considering the Roman influence at the time, there were lots of Europeans there.

 

Lamentations should not be taken literally. It is a Lament of the fate of Jerusalem and uses picture language. Several cities mentioned in the OT, including Ur, have 'Lamentations' written over their destruction.

 

They were all likely the same color, whatever the color may have been. Since it's basically the same locale.
Different nations aren't different races.
Actually, the term race didn't even exist back then.

 

If they knew there were more races,
Noah would have had more sons.

 

The Bible didn't mention 95% of the worlds population. Like all religions, it was geo-centric and limited to the knowledge of the people who wrote it - not an omnipotent god.

 

African-Amercans are mixed brown colors and by today's standards black.

 

Of course, Eithiopians are black.

 

same reason why images and idols are prohibited, because colour and phenotypes should not be important but whites made it so by using the kmt formulae to colonize the holy lands and establish the illuminati again in modern times. this is why the dollar bill has the pyramid and all seeing eyes, as reverence to ancient kmt and not Israel.

 

black was also Iraq, saudi arabia, yemen, somalia, spain and ancient egypt , which was also sub sahara

 

Are you aware people in the ancient Middle East did not look like most of the people in the Middle East today?

Arab invasions beginning in the Seventh Century changed the whole landscape, but you can still see a few minority groups like the Yazidis and Chaldean Christians that give some better idea of what the ancient people in the Northern Middle East region might have looked like. Almost Caucasian.

 

Unlikely. They were probably colored black for another symbolic reason.

 

I've done a little looking into this and my personal view is that the ancient Egyptians probably looked like a four-way mix between Black, White, something unique that no longer exists today, and the way the current population of Egypt looks.
You can see the faces painted on old mummies from before the Arab invasion period. They look kind of like a mix between Greek and African (maybe more like Somali African) but have a unique look all their own.

It's still possible the Egyptians might have been darker and looked different before the Roman period, but unfortunately the facial depictions are not as detailed before then.

 

i do hope you are aware that there were no people at all in the middle east 500 years ago.

 

What does that mean?