The Box?

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by Tram Law, Jun 6, 2014.

  1. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That is not in compliance with your former statement regarding what you believe reality to be.
     
  2. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The Photons we see are not matter, but energy.

    They have nothing to do with the pixels which compose matter that reflects them.

    What we see is the box.
    Space itself is composed of pixel size cubes which measure
    "h" X "h" X "h".

    In f

    - - - Updated - - -

    Then you must have misunderstood me.

    I use the dictionary for both Reality and Truth:
    One is always defined by using the other.
     
  3. Tram Law

    Tram Law Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    9,582
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, not always.

    Hallucinations, sleep paralysis, what kind of truths do things like these lead to?
     
  4. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Truth is the image of Reality, but is not actually Reality itself.
    Truth looks just like Reality to us.
    Truth the, is what we call reality because reality must b e figured out by using those pixels we were talking about.

    It is the same looking thing, as far as we can tell.

    Immanuel Kant explained this as follows:

    Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), in the Critique of Pure Reason, distinguished between objects as phenomena, which are objects as shaped and grasped by human sensibility and understanding,... (as truth about them)...
    ... and objects as a thing as it is in itself, or noumena, (distinct from a thing conceived, or imaged, as it is, in itself), which do not appear to us in space and time at all, but only as mental constructs...
     
  5. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Those are all lies and deceits aren't they?

    They are more like dreams might be.
    When we think things are true which are not true, they do not really exist.
    And we are just holding a false opinion of them.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Excellent...

    ""We are not human beings having a mental experience.
    We are mental beings having a human experience."
     
  6. Tram Law

    Tram Law Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    9,582
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not necessarily.

    I sometimes think that these things could be just other snippets of other realities invading this one. Some people can see them, but can not process them, so they become mentally ill.

    Another way to look at it is just because something is faulty doesn't neccesarily mean it is a lie or a deciet. lies and deceit have purpose, to mislead people. These things are not truly misleading people but just might be random events.

    But this is just speculation, and not very logical one at that.
     
  7. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you are kidding aren't you?
     
  8. NightSwimmer

    NightSwimmer New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,548
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    It's all explained in great detail here. ;)
     
  9. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well why didn't you say that in fhe first place instead of beating the burning bush? LOL.

     
  10. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :roflol:

    I'm sure its excellent therapy for the author.
     
  11. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I am forced by good conscience to agree with you. I don't believe anyone else would even credit it with the label of 'therapy'.. IMHO.
     
  12. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No.
    The smallest possible length in Space is "h", the Planck Length.


    The universal constants that Planck units, by definition, normalize to 1 are:
    • the gravitational constant, G,
    • the reduced Planck constant, ħ,
    • the speed of light in a vacuum, c,
    • the Coulomb constant, (4πε0)−1 (sometimes ke or k), and
    • the Boltzmann constant, kB (sometimes k).


    So Space is really a series of cubes of Length "h":

    [​IMG]
     
    Tram Law and (deleted member) like this.
  13. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Funny,..

    hahahaaaaa..

    But Planck Lengths are very much studied today, and the Physicists call them "God's lengths."


    Planck units are sometimes called "God's units",[1][2] since Planck units are free of anthropocentric arbitrariness.

    Some physicists argue that communication with extraterrestrial intelligence would have to employ such a system of units in order to be understood.[3]
    Unlike the metre and second, which exist as fundamental units in the SI system for historical reasons, the Planck length and Planck time are conceptually linked at a fundamental physical level.

    A span called the Planck length, is the shortest anything can get. According to recent developments in the quest to devise a so-called "theory of everything," space is not an infinitely divisible continuum. It is not smooth but granular, and the Planck length gives the size of its smallest possible grains.
    http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/GrainySpace.html
     
  14. Tram Law

    Tram Law Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    9,582
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How many of these Planck lengths are in an inch? I'm having a hard time finding an answer.
     
  15. Red Cloud

    Red Cloud New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NS, I think you have hit on the reason for our being here--to keep our ears to the ground and our noses to the grindstone (or vice versa!) As all true scientists know, the higher the heat the faster the atoms move. This atomic loss of atoms is especially noticeable in the male animal. The genital area is the major portal of loss. That is why with age the genital area becomes flaccid due to the loss of atoms.

    BTW, I'm not a Doctor, but I did spend a night in a Holiday Inn Express!
     
  16. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    [​IMG]

    This chart tells you how many are in one meter, (m).
     
  17. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I Meter = 39.3701 Inches.

    So...use some math.

    AboveAlpha
     
  18. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Everything you visually see is just Visible Light reflecting off or being generated by what you view.

    The smallest thing both Matter and Energy can be broken down to is QUANTUM PARTICLE/WAVE FORMS.

    Even Protons and Neutrons...ie...Hadrons....are completely comprised of Quantum Particle/Wave Forms of Energy such as Quarks, Gluons, Higgs-Bosons....etc.

    The big question is attempting to define and understand the UFT or UNIFIED FIELD THEORY as the Maro Scale does not behave the same upon the Quantum Level and vise versa

    AboveAlpha
     
  19. cupid dave

    cupid dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    17,005
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    48
    All true, but the photons light upon units of matter. a
    Then they enter into our eyes, telling us what they shape that matter has in accord with the pixels we see and do not see.
     
  20. Tram Law

    Tram Law Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    9,582
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank you, but I do not have the capacity for that level of math.
     
  21. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    OK....what you posted here makes no sense.

    Depending upon the light source....as this will determine the various spectrum of visible and non-visible light reflecting off a material....well...let's just use the SUN.

    All the different forms of light the sun generates will reflect off a material and then the rods and cones within our eyes....members can spend their own time learning about how our eyes work....then detect that light and send signals to our brain which then interprets this data and forms a picture in our mind.....more like a digital video.

    Pixels are specific to TV's, Monitors...etc.

    AboveAlpha
     
  22. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Most of what you post makes no sense,,, IMHO.

     
  23. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sorry, I don't buy it.

    it is a length. it is not an geometric object.
    It cannot have be a cube since the diagonal of a cube nor a square is larger than its side. and there is no partial measurment such as a third of a planck.
     
  24. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Well...then take the time to Google and LEARN A FEW THINGS!!!

    AboveAlpha
     
  25. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I spend quite a bit of time on Google searching out some of the claims that are made on this forum. I admit that I have learned a little from such searches. The most magnificent thing that I have learned is that most people on this forum don't even comprehend the fact that they are making positive claims and assertions when they use such words as "is" when describing something.
     

Share This Page