At the moment law enforcement in various states is assisting in the resistance. That matter aside, exactly what can the united states government and military do to actually stop an armed rebellion or uprising?
Pretending I didn’t doesn’t make you any less wrong https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/700
Law enforcement is taking up arms against the government? Lol Kill everyone taking up arms against the government. That would be treason. But as I said, local law enforcement would swiftly put down any rebellion in a matter of hours. The US army wouldn’t be involved.
Pretending I didn’t doesn’t make you any less wrong https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/700
not one single Federal court has ever held that a state may leave the Union without the consent of the other states. sorry.
Oh, maybe you can cite the language in the constitution that forbids any of the sovereign states from exiting the treaty.
its the job of the courts to settle these issues, and they found that a state may only secede with the consent of the other states a state may only break up into two states, again with the consent of the other states. thats how it works. dont like it? tough luck.
Sorry. I set you up to undertake an impossible task. I asked you to show me the language in the constitution that prohibits any of the sovereign states from exiting the treaty. You failed, as I knew you would. I almost feel bad.
where does the Constitution specifically allow States to make drugs, or murder, or rape illegal? where does the Constitution specifically allow States to ban abortion? gotcha!!!!
WRONG. article 1 section 9 of the USC mentions nothing about the States having the authority to make certain behaviors crimes, especially medical procedures.
section 10 also says nothing about the authority to make illegal certain behaviors, including medical procedures.
I believe you are correct. There is nothing in the constitution that forbids any of the member countries from exiting the treaty.
Law enforcement in various states is essentially declaring that it will not enforce various firearm-related restrictions. It is assisting the resistance by doing nothing to prevent the public from having access and possession to prohibited firearms and magazines. And how exactly would this widespread killing actually occur if armed rebellion occurred, and local law enforcement proved insufficient to stop it? Explain such.
