They want to Ban Guns

Dito.

 

Xenamenes and tom444, you can make all the general statements you want and hit nothing. Keep it up.

Please, you two, read this
http://simplikation.com/why-sealioning-is-bad/

 

We know you have many choices on where to parade your ignorance and we thank you for choosing this forum.

 

"
Xenamenes and tom444, you can make all the general statements you want and hit nothing. Keep it up.

Please, you two, read this
http://simplikation.com/why-sealioning-is-bad/

Last edited: Today at 9:10 AM"




Thank you Jack.

 

^^^

 

Thus meaning the author is suggesting that any claim, no matter how devoid of logic, should be accepted at face value and regarded as being the absolute truth, correct?

 

Nope, Xenamenes, read it again. When you post, do not ask a sealion question.

 

It has indeed been read, but nothing of actual relevance has been seen. The only thing presented is the notion that it is somehow wrong to be asking for proof of an unverified claim. It is the same notion used do deny releasing the science that supposedly proves climate change is a real event.

If a claim cannot be reinforced with proof, it is a false claim.

 

There are no guns on mars...Lol .... I think

 

So, Xenamenes, you are doubling down and you continue to play sealion to the max. Everything was given. And you and your buds still trolled. I warned you. Bye. http://simplikation.com/why-sealioning-is-bad/

 

As if the above is of any actual importance, or actually amounts to a significant loss.

 

So?

 

Yes.

So ?

And for the record, NRA has made no such information public.

 

And then, of course, there's the reality of the situation:

"Good guy with a gun" refers to people with CCW permits.
The shooter was ~450yyds away.
Explain how the LV shooting negates the "good guy with a gun" argument.

 

48.2% is never a majority.

 

Said no rational, thinking person, ever.

 

Please explain how this does not qualify as a "bearable arm" as the term is used with regard to the 2nd.