Trump 11/15 Twitter. Proof That Trump Won't Go Quietly

Still waiting for you all to figure out the Dems are playing you for suckers

 

What Dems would those be and how? I'm not a donor. How could I be a sucker? Doesn't make sense.

 

There are only two choices: 100% support of the entire republican platform and all its' members, or you are a communist. Choose.

 

I dunno. That's a yuge platform. Trump.

Guess I'm a commie.

 

Partisans (both teams,) are not fans of nuance.

 

And in order to accept that any political issue is what you want, all you have to do is deny those who say it's not.
Have the democrats been plotting ways to destroy Trump's presidency since day one? Of course not. You can find thousands of democrats from the street to the congress to the courts that say that never happened. Unfortunately we no longer live in an age where people that used to have integrity and refused to deny truth no longer exist.

Today, we have people declaring that the constitution is now an obstacle to progress. It is the world's most admired constitution, the one that every soldier, every law officer and every member of congress has sworn to defend.

I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.


But now,it's an "obstacle to progress". NO. It's an obstacle, for sure- but to corruption and corrupt political systems.

Bias and corruption are hardly limited to politics. Judges, prosecutors, mayors, etc. All kinds of people with power have been dismissing their oaths of office- which constitute a pledge to YOU as well as the nation- and simply by using their latitude of power, deny justice. For example- a judge can look at evidence, and say ignore it arbitrarily. His reasons can be bias, friendship, politics or money.

A few years ago I was in a damage lawsuit over $400k in materials I had bought and legally owned, stored in an old building that the man I was suing had sold months earlier. He was in a tax conflict over the building, and he wanted the building demolished- so sold it to a demolition contractor. However, that didn't solve his tax issue, and so he hired a man to set fire to that building, destroying the contents I owned- which he knew was there and was soon to be moved out. I found the man he hired to set the fire, subpoenaed him and he testified in court that he had been paid by the defendant to set the fire that destroyed my property. I presented quotes for the cost of replacement, the current value, and actual checks being held as deposits from people who had already contracted to buy part of the property. The lawsuit was tried in the small town where this took place- and despite having roots there, I was from the city. The judge ruled in our favor. Then, he issued a judgement for our loss- Nothing, saying- "How do we know this material is worth anything?" They also declined to file arson charges; no charges for either the man who paid for it nor the one who did it. How can that happen?

The defendant told me after the trial, without witnesses- that paying the judge was a lot cheaper than paying me. Laughed about it.
Never in my lifetime has the level of corruption in public office and the legal system approached what is happening today.

We tolerate this at our peril- When you embrace an obviously questionable situation and dismiss it because that serves you better or someone tells you what you want to hear- you dismiss your own right to justice as well.... And what goes around, comes around.

 

I actually just did a paper about this for my MBA These guys think that all it takes for you to be a monopoly is that you be popular.

 

I take it you've never been on Twitter or FB, because there is a metric **** ton of conservative content on both. What you are complaining about is the occasional fact checking (which doesn't prevent people from hearing anything) or posts being removed for violating terms . . . which all platforms do . . . yes, even Parler.

 

That's a sad story, but doesn't answer the question.

So far:

Media
Legal experts
Politicians
Election officials
Cybersecurity officials
Dept of Homeland Security
Numerous judges, including SCOTUS

Have all said there is no evidence of fraud.

Do you really believe a 6-3 conservative SCOTUS and DHS, and the republican election officials & governors, are colluding to help team blue?

 

So, no voter fraud. On that we agree.

 

I guess if you ignore half the news, you wouldn't have a clue. Most crimes lack evidence until the investigations are done. If you then deny that the evidence is evidence, then there is no evidence.
We have had elected officials denying that rioters are violent, that looting is criminal, organizing bail so criminals are set free, refusing to charge or prosecute such people- and the same people find "evidence" of all kinds of crime in situations devoid of evidence when the story relates to Trump. That is the DS, or double standard of people who don't give a damn about right and wrong- they just want to protect your "team blue", meaning the people who hate Trump. Amazing to me how such a substantial number of them are readily willing to do to others what they would find incredibly unjust and offensive if done to them. We've been watching that duplicitous character vacuum since the beginning of the 2015 campaign, and with each failure, they double down and increase it.

This morning, a substantial movement is surfacing about people volunteering to move to Georgia from blue states to set up a shill residence and vote for the democratic candidate in the senate run-off.
Purpose- get control of the senate by usurping the right of the people of Georgia to choose their own candidate. This being a run-off election in January, those people have already voted for their own representatives in their home states, now they want to vote again to deprive others of equal rights. Most of this movement sources in California and the west coast liberal enclaves. A lot of liberals have a selective morality, a situational set of rules that justifies different standards for things according to what is convenient. Also known as being devoid of integrity.

What would you say if enough people in red states suddenly moved temporarily to your state in that way to turn the election against the will of the true residents? Would you approve of people creating a scam to deprive you of an equal vote by packing the polls with shill voters? What if they find a way to establish these "residence" statuses legally, thus there is no legal evidence of crime. Would you then see no evidence of dishonesty or malicious intent?

Or- would you think it's OK for the dems to that, but corrupt for the republicans to do that?
Would you ever ask yourself what the character of people willing to do that must be like to even see it as acceptable to do?
Would you ever even question the integrity of any political party or group that would propose such a scam?

Don't tell me- ask yourself those questions. See if you can stomach the answers.

 

I can stomach the answers, as I'm not partisan.

Wrong is wrong; I don't care about those little letters next to names, like some do.

I never never, in my life, not one time, voted straight party ticket. I always split my vote. No party should ever have full control. It's bad for America.

Biden was the second time I ever voted D for the big chair, since my first vote for Reagan's second term in 1984. The other D was Obama's first term.

I mostly vote 3rd party. I just wanted the chaos to go away.

 

I heard medical people report that this Covid-19 virus does have a negative affect on brain cells. Not sure if it affects ( brain cell deterioration) more so with older individuals than younger ones. So between reduced mental capabilities and Covid induced psychosis you very well may be right.

 

And I commend anyone who votes for man over party. I voted for Obama first term too. Regret that now, but I felt it was the best choice at the time, and the D factor didn't control that.
I think we have long made the mistake of appraising candidates based on the nice guy image, the smooth talker.

Ask yourself if you would want the job- and if you really think that a nice guy would stand a snowball's chance in hell of being able to do it and get results.
I think you are smart enough to know that it's a very rough game behind the scenes, and only a smart, tough player would have a chance. What politicians have always shown us a facade of respectability, while a biker-bar gang fight is actually going on behind it. Trump failed to play the game that way; failed to wear the facade and fool the people. I see that as honesty- perhaps a political mistake for him, but you have to admit that what you have seen from politicians in the last few years has revealed there is a hell of a lot of ugly behind the facade of congress and agencies of government.

There are no clean, honorable nice guys in washington politics. None. They couldn't get elected, let alone survive.

 

Interesting scenario but I would not get much on the SS having legal power to do that. You can dream!

 

You must commend the Dem's strategy. Cheat and then laugh off any accusations. It's a pretty good one.

 

It certainly has seemed to distort the mental capabilities of his opposition, even if they haven't contracted it yet. That may well qualify as an induced psychosis, the adaptation of the disease as the next excuse and weapon in the MALV war- to Make America Like Venezuela. people don't even seem to realize they have it until they have lost their moral compass, then it's too late.

 

Maybe I am wrong but I heard that at one point Hitler thought that Slalin surrendered and that the Soviet troops approaching Berlin were bringing him the dinged surrender document!

So Hitler went off on the deep end and Trump.........well.....Trump is what Dan we say, he is just Trump.

 

Insane and baseless accusations deserve to be laughed off. How can you blame our Democrat friends for going what is logical and correct?

 

Results that you don't like aren't "irregularities." Try again. You guys are the ones trying to "get to the end, just as long as you get there."

 

We don't. Or at least, we wouldn't if they did.
We blame them for the delusion of being logical and correct while acting like they have gone bonkers.

 

You are correct about one thing and that is a main one. The people who actually believed Donald the Con Man must have a very broken moral compass otherwise they would not have followed that charlatan Donald.

I am getting very concerned that you may also be correct in that this Virus may indeed have caused a dangerous reduction of the mental capabilities of Donald fans and yes that reduction in mental capabilities very well may have been caused by induction. This was known in the Ancient world as the Induction -Reduction.

One of the symptoms of a brain with reduced mental capabilities is the lack of reasoning power to understand that the conditions in Venezuela and the US are so vastly different that even the concept of the US becoming like Venezuela is beyond ignorance or stupidity.

 

Don't you find it funny how the GOP isn't complaining about "irregularities" in the Senate Races?

I wonder why?

 

The latest excuse I got was that there was a global cabal pulling off the greatest and most well-organized fraud in American history . . . but they only cared about beating Trump and didn't care about using their global cabal to do any kind of actual takeover . . . for some reason. Laziest Illuminati ever.

 

In the insurance industry we have a concept of testing for frequency and severity. Events such as claim that are frequent but very low in severity will not hurt us. Events that are severe may indeed hurt us.

Therefore small irregularities though maybe frequent in reletive terms will not cause high impact.

Severe events very well may.. examples of severe events are those such as the mythical 2.7 million votes that Donnie claims were changed from Trump to Biden would be severe. But but but but such an event never happened.

Small irregularities even as frequent events though they should not happen just do not accumulate to cause significant impact.

So Team Giuliani -Trump has nothing significant and they most likely no proof of anything significant because if they did they would have presented that proof by now.

All that team Giuliani-Trump has are acts of attempted sabotage. Just like terrorists Team Giuliani -Trump is living in the cesspool of lies and schiest and their only tool now is terrorism.