You have yet to address any of my comments with anything other than name calling, misrepresentation, falsehoods and fallacy. Get an argument.
Your comments are shuck & jive straw.....men. Nothing to actually address, keep trying to find a comfort distraction rabbit hole though........
I make claims and give justification for those claims. All you have done is repeated the same insults over and over - and now you are trying to transfer your failings on to me Mr. Rabbit
I have to note the flaw in your argument...the assumption that the intel community, the folk that sort of missed the crash of the Soviet Empire, misread the Iranian revolution, that sort of missed the 911 plot, and that is chin deep in the deep state working 24/7 to remove Trump, are 'American Patriots'. Remember the silly line "all 17 intelligence agencies agree with the assessment".....etc. Turns out no one could name those 17 agencies. Further turned out that 17 was actually 4 and at least one or two of those 4 have been caught playing politics in support of the deep state. I cannot speak for you but I am pretty sure a good bit of the leadership of those fine intel agencies is deeply involved in the shadow government and cannot be relied on to tell anyone what is really going on.
You out debated yourself with your post #8 and when called out, you asked for proof and it was given by your post #8. You believe the RU propaganda over the IC American patriots. You can run from this post you yourself made but you can't hide from it and being exposed by it. Keep trying to distraction bait though .
Is simply providing the voters the truth about a candidate, a truth delivered in the form of their (Clinton and the DNC) own words and E-mails really dangerous 'interference'? Perhaps it was simply the application of some sunshine while the lefts own US media was working 24/7 to keep the details of Clinton criminality under wraps?
Let me see, 24/7 regurgitation of the lefts talking points by the media and politicians is in some way NOT propaganda but noting the curious coincidence that the entire argument from the left could be produced on a napkin or single tweet is deep intellectual argument? yeah sure.
As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on whether or not Russia interfered to begin with. (as in the State). I have trouble with the idea that some facebook add which speaks the truth (a pic of Bernie Sanders with the caption "The Clinton foundation is a problem) constitutes "interference". What is nonsense is the claim that voters knowing "The Truth" harms our electoral process. Does someone knowing the Truth have an effect ? Absolutely it does - or should. With the partisanship these days "the truth" matters not. The problem with Russiagate is that it is focusing on a raindrop while the hurricane is being ignored ... some of this hurricane is given in post 123. In addition to the items in 123 ... the abject hypocrisy is way to painful to bear. The US interferes with the democratic processes of other nations on a very regular basis - in a way far more nefarious than facebook ads stating the Truth. What if Putin said - OK .. we will send those involved in what you claim as harming your electoral process if you send the people involved in harming the electoral processes of other nations to us ? How do you think that conversation would end ? Hysterical laughs ... that is how. According to testimony during the Strozk hearings .. the foreign entity that Hacked Clinton's emails was not Russia ? The BS just continues to pile up.
Not all in the IC are "patriots". What is clear however is that you are the furthest thing from a Patriot.
Who are 'they'? The same intel agencies and investigations that DID note the Russian attempts to hack the GOP's computers without success while the lefts media sort of forgot to note that. Could it be simply that the DNC and the Clinton campaign made it easy to hack their sites while the GOP and Trump campaigns took security more seriously? Nah, that can't be it. Have you ever noted how the lefts argument against Trump is so very easily debunked? Their arguments, seldom more substantial than an empty headed talking point repeated ad nauseum require readers to be incapable of doing any research and further requires a basic level of ignorance about the law and the Constitution.
Debate ? since when is name calling, spewing falsehoods, putting words in the other posters mouth - Strawman fallacy, proof for anything other than lack of ability to debate
sorry, your president did nothing but bite the pillow while the Russian gangsta rammed it home til completion. Sick.
I see a President that has acted very strangely, who's cabinet and campaign -clearly- colluded with the Russians, now cozying up and opening cheeks for Putin. You see rainbows and unicorns. Paint **** pink and yellow and underneath it's still ****, sad to say.