Trump: 'Rocket Man' Kim Jong Un is on a 'suicide mission'.....

You are playing lawyer for the communist dictator

Kim got everything he was promised and resumed testing a few years later

 

Trumps provocations?

No need to read anything you said after that because you obviously have no idea what you are talking about

 

Red China and North Korea are responsible for the crisis in Korea not trump and the United States

It would help if anti trumpsters in the US and Europe would put their kneejerk hate for trump aside and present a united front against our Asian enemy

But they won't

 

Exactly. http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/f...-with-north-korea-would-make-the-world-safer/

 

Leftists have never met a dictator they didn't like. That's been most noticeable since the 1960's when leftists began carrying around copies of Mao's 'Little Red Book'. They'll support dictatorships in Latin America, Asia, Africa while attacking their own democratic leaders, especially those in the US.

During that time they supported Communism, which killed 100 million people and ruined the lives of millions more. More recently they've supported Saddam Hussein, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Muslim Brotherhood, and anything Chinese or Russian. Now they're supporting Kim Jung un - a 33 year-year-old megalomaniac who has watched millions of his own people starve to death and has access to nuclear weapons. They seem to seriously compare him to an elected American leader while ridiculing the American people in the process..

Of course the educational system is also following the leftist habit of indoctrinating innocent minds rather than educating them - fighting against free speech and creating a reality-free class of zombies whose feelings are now more important than facts.

Once these people are dumbed down - and we now have the retrospect to see how it's done - their choices become more easily understood. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...-intellectualism-and-the-dumbing-down-america

 

Sounds like Kim would fit right in with the Democrats in our Congress.
Brings to mind when Reagan provided amnesty for 3 million illegal immigrants, in return for increased border security in 1986, which 30 years later Trump is still trying to accomplish.
But that's another topic, only pointing out that Kim recognizes that his ability to make demands is based on the level of threat by which he is perceived.

 

And as a result the billions of dollars of aid Clinton provided North Korea enabled them to become a much larger threat than before, when he estimated the cost of war might result in hundreds of thousands of casualties. Now, the initiation of war could result from a much larger number of casualties in a matter of seconds.

Clinton also said “North Korea will freeze and then dismantle its nuclear program. South Korea and our other allies will be better protected. The entire world will be safer as we slow the spread of nuclear weapons.”
And did they?

 

Clinton made these promise but his successors were always able to pass them on to the next presidents. It was a political Ponzi scheme.and now Donald Trump is left holding the bag.

 

When the leader of one country vows to launch a nuclear attack another then that threat must be taken seriously, and then acted upon before it happens.

 

1. No military threat had been posed toward North Korea by the U.S. or any other Nation.
2. Only sanctions have been imposed as a result of their breaking their word made with Clinton to "freeze and then dismantle its nuclear program", which they obviously did not and appear to have no intention of doing so but instead work very hard to be seen as a more potent threat to those who refuse to give in to any demands they make.
Kim has openly promoted himself as a threat to the safety of U.S. citizens which resulted in Trump making him aware of the consequences which would follow as a result of such arrogant stupidity.
Is that straight enough for you?

I agree, and I would support Trump telling Kim that should he perform an atmospheric test of a nuclear weapon anywhere other than on sovereign North Korean soil, it would be considered an act of war which would result in the destruction of any and all missile sites including the seat of government of North Korea, and much greater should any response to that occur which would only cease as a result of total surrender of North Korea to control by the South Korean government. After all Kim has stated previously that he would like to see North and South Korea reunified once again. Although his seeing it happen is not really necessary.

 

Yes indeed

Having nukes that can reach America raises the threat level consderably

And knowing we are a deeply divided country where many clueless liberals hate trump more than they hate kim helps the enemy considerably

 

No

Clinton and the kim dynasty lied

 

Whether anyone likes DJT or not they have to admit that he means business; all the other wannabe presidents would be running around like headless chickens right now if they were in the hot seat.

 

So as expected....the Norks are escalating the rhetoric. Another tweet is coming soon. Surely this won't be unanswered.

North Korea Says Rockets To U.S. 'Inevitable'

“We are finally only a few steps away from the final gate of completion of the state nuclear force,” said North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/09/23/north-korea-says-rockets-to-u-s-inevitable_a_23220590/

UNITED NATIONS/WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) - North Korea said on Saturday firing its rockets at the U.S. mainland was "inevitable" after U.S. President Donald Trump called Pyongyang's leader "rocket man," in a further escalation of rhetoric between the two countries over the North's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile program...

 

A fingerwetting washington establishment occupier of the Oval Office would be burning up the diplomatic channels trying to find out what bribes it will take to get kim to stop making threats

 

China did not allow the US to destroy North Korea in 1950 even though the US was on the verge of doing so. Trump has yet to explain how China has changed its stance. His comments indicate that he knows of a change in China's 1950 policy. I detect no change.

 

Meaning china dictates our foreign policy now?

Thats news to me

 

How did you determine that? NK wants to turn the entire peninsula communist, and as they proved in 1950, they will use force to do so. Absolutely nothing has occurred in the past 65 years that would indicate their intentions have changed.

 

Right on. I always see people saying "we don't want a war with China." How about "China doesn't want a war with us" for a change?

 

The US 1950 policy was the removal of the NK communist regime by military force. In 1952ish, China's actions dictated a change in US policy. The US determined that removal of the communists by force was no longer an option. What has changed since then? China is even more powerful today.

 

They slept through 3 credit hours of history but did get the main message which is that America is always at fault for everything

 

In fact it has been the US changing China's, and Russia's, foreign policies. Do you feel China and Russia are the same now as they were in 1952?

 

Your knowledge of history is so bad I don't even know where to start

The US had withdrawn from South Korea and had no military force there when the north invaded in 1950

So your first claim is wrong

And China entered the war in late 1950 not 1952

 

People aren't just saying we don't want a war with China; the US government changed its 1950 policy of removal by force to containment specifically because it didn't want a war with a considerably weaker 1950 China.