Trump: Talking to NK's Kim a waste, 'will do what needs to be done'

You are this forum's #1 Mohammad defender, and its #1 KJU defender. Stop defending barbarians.

 

So again, How many dead South Korean civilians are acceptable to you to sate your bloodlust?

 

You really do, I'm serious, put KJU and Trump on the exact same moral plane, don't you. Wow.

No, totalitarian communism we need to end, as soon as feasible. Monarchies too. Freedom will win.

 

I don't want death - only Kim does.

 

How many dead South Korean civilians is your war of choice worth? Bush’s war of choice cost a million dead Iraqi civilians. Would you consider a million dead South Korean civilians as being worth it?

 

As each month passes, Kim will get more and more nukes, and the number of American and S Korean dead will skyrocket.

 

Then why are you supporting a war of choice in North Korea that will result in the deaths of at the very least tens of thousands of dead South Korean civilians?

 

Only if you are stupid enough to think North Korea would launch a suicidal first strike. I’m not that stupid. Are you?

 

You still haven’t answered the question. How many dead South Korean civilians are worth it for your war of choice?

 

It's not a war of "choice".....he's leaving no choice....when he starts selling nukes to Islamic nations (because his people will soon only be eating grass, due to the necessary sanctions that Trump is finally hammering Kim with) then all hell will break lose and the sooner we take him out the better. Don't ask ME, as I'M not the one defying the international community to constantly test nukes and shoot missiles over Japan! KIM IS THE PROBLEM.

 

You're betting on the SANITY of a madman.....not a good bet.

 

It is a war of choice. North Korea hasn’t invaded or bombed anyone (and before you bring up that island again, consider that the South Koreans who died in that didn’t consider it worth going to full scale war over). We would be choosing to start an offensive war, one that would inevitably involve North Korean retaliation against Soeul. We would own every casualty that came out of that just as Bush owns all the casualties his war of choice begat.

 

I’m betting on this previous actions. If Un wanted to launch WMDs at other countries, he’s had the ability for 30 years.

 

You empower tyrants by giving them a pass on their atrocities. Do you fully condemn Kim for his gulags?

 

Yes I do. He’s a monster.

However, his crimes in his country aren’t worth the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent South Korean civilians, especially not in a war we start against their will.

 

Agreed.

If not stopped soon, he'll hit LA, NY, Washington DC, Seoul, Tokyo, etc. He already shot a missile over Japan in a test run. He wants SK back, since he's never signed the peace treaty in that still-active war.

 

We shoot missiles over other countries pretty much every time we test them. Why is that any different?

And why would North Korea launch a suicidal first strike? That doesn’t make any sense.

 

Firing a missile over Japan, evidently without a warhead on board, is a far cry from "hitting" anywhere, let alone a US city.

See how you are?

 

It's the first step, basically, and shows his disregard for international law and peace.

 

We don't regularly launch missiles over, say, North Korea, though.

 

Because like Trump says, Kim is suicidal. Like Christians, you're putting a lot of faith in a madman.

 

No, we launch them over Micronesia. Does that make it better?

North Korea has to launch its missile tests into open ocean away from trade lanes. The only directions they can launch in and achieve that forces their trajectories to go over Japan.

 

And I’m supposed to take Trump’s word for it?

What evidence do you have that Un is Suicidal?

 

You assert that it is a 'first step'. I see no reason to agree with that. Kim and co. say it's all defensive and a deterrent.

You also assert that they want to conquer South Korea. They may want that, but this is not the way to go about making it happen. Putting everyone on edge and upsetting even their long-time allies by their behavior, and getting us to increase our presence in the region, is not the kind of strategy they should pursue if they want to invade and capture South Korea successfully. It does not add up at all.

 

Yes, he will attack us if we treat NK like Iraq, or Libya, or Syria. To avoid this, we do as we do already with russia and china. We do not attack or invade them, and they let us live. Pretty simple paradigm there. But it never made it to your retina. RIght?