Oh the cute names again, how juvenile. What's your problem with Senator Blumenthal, is he putting too much pressure on your god Trump with the lawsuit he has that's going forward against Trump and his violations of the emoluments clause? Yes, that must be it.
He lied about his non-existent viet nam service no wonder he hates Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh gets on the Supreme court-look to gun bans in places like CT to get 86D
This must mean you take exception to the anti-gun faction using the faces and names of these kids to push their political agenda. Right?
Attempts to promote disingenuous falsehoods like that are precisely why the gun ban crowd lacks credibility.
Do you mean cliche's like: "If 'common sense' gun laws 'for the children' only 'save one life', they're worth it."? In other words, if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, befuddle them with B.S.
There are many examples, yes - post hoc fallacies, non-sequitur fallacies - they all fall under appeals to ignorance and/or dishonesty, and are the mainstay of anti-gun reasoning. Edit: Forgot to include red herrings. Sorry.
LOL such a blatant lie. You have been utterly destroyed by the facts so many times just uttering the word "fact" means you can't sit down for a week.
Ok. I will start. I support banning bump stocks. They were used in the largest mass shooting in this country and their potential for mass killings outweighs any possible good they may have. It should be done by congress and not trump though. Debate. LOL
I, unlike many others, have no problem debating. I think the bump stock ban is just a feel good law that won't do much. Other than Vegas I can't think of any other time they were used.
Ok. Not sure what that has to do with bump stocks. Oh almost forgot, Xenamnes wanted someone to convey a message to you that he posted above. The gist of it is... Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
