Twitter Suspends Proud Boys And Founder Gavin McInnes Accounts Ahead Of Unite The Right Rally

They're a bunch of clowns. Now you've heard differently.

It is the job of police to suppress groups like Antifa if they get violent. This is nothing but a bunch of vigilantes looking for a fight. They are no better than the Antifa nuts causing problems. They should all be put in a cage.

 

"Their neww media platform"? Who are these people you're referring to White Supremacists? Nazis?

Sorry. Only Leftists hear these dog whistles. Others read the words and take them at face value especially in this case where the same point is made more than once. In fact it's quite interesting if you read it without the whistles.

 

More hysteria about "Neo Nazis". What have these guys even done except pose for photos?

 

I thought you took trump seriously but not literally. So you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.

 

They get promoted for engaging in violence. What more needs to be said?

 

No one ever claimed the 1st Amendment wasn't a negative right involving the government. That's your projection. I see you don't make that distinction when the NFL shuts down player's kneeling.

<Rule 2/3>

 

The hate started during the Obama years.

And all of the hate and violence was committed by the left.

If you didn't vote for Obama...you were a racist.

If you opposed Obamacare...you were a racist.

"pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon," began during the Obama years.

OWS...Obama years.

Alynskism 101...Agitate, cause trouble and divide society.

That's what Saul Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation teaches wannabe community and union organizers.

Every time President Obama summoned Al Sharpton to the White House, Sharpton was sent to some city and rioting, looting, arson and destroying of private property followed. Mission accomplished.

If the Democratic party's Taliban weren't toppling American war memorials and actively trying to erase America's history, language, customs and traditions there never would have been a Charlottesville a year ago.

How much longer do you think the silent majority are going to remain silent ?

 

What violence have those guys engaged in? Or are you talking of Antifa and those who want to restrain free speech?

 

Have no idea what you're referring to.

 

You linked to IGD (It's Going Down)

Who we are:
It’s Going Down is a digital community center for anarchist, anti-fascist, autonomous anti-capitalist and anti-colonial movements. Our mission is to provide a resilient platform to publicize and promote revolutionary theory and action.

What we do:
We publish original content alongside anonymous submissions as well as repost articles from websites which share our perspectives.

We maintain active Twitter, Instagram and Facebook social media accounts.

We offer this website through Tor Hidden Services @ http://IGDNEWSdjfmg7kxu.onion (Please download and use Tor Browser).

We offer a minimal, encrypted, ephemeral, anonymous chat application – igd.chat.

We are anarchists:
We act in the spirit of autonomy, mutual-aid, and solidarity. We have no allegiance to representational politics. To read more about anarchist ideas, check out our library or watch these select videos:

https://itsgoingdown.org/about/

 

Lol...We already know that right-wingers are a violent bunch who hate their fellow countrymen.

 

The Proud Boys are violent but in no way racist.

 

That doesn't look like Reagan.

 

I am pretty sure that everyone is against actual racism. Well, everyone but the .3% of folks that guide their lives by racism. The contention is that the left wants to paint everyone a racist. If you oppose leftists ideals, you're a racist, and they have the moral obligation to silence you. It's beyond stupid on the part of those that don't financially gain. I mean, do you financially gain from silencing opposing view points?

 

The real question is what limit do you support private property rights. Seems that support for business owners rights has also become political. You kick out a member of Trump's cabinet from your restaurant, you have rights. You refuse to bake a cake, the supreme court has to overrule lower courts decisions to prove you have rights, and that wasn't even private property but on the basis of art. You can define hate speech and kick folks out based on your definition, but what if it's a hate filled minority in a local business? You make national news as a bigot.

All of this gray area of interpretation does nothing but consolidate power to those that already have it. I agree 100% with Twitter's decision, but I also agree 100% that any other business owner should have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

 

If the left wants to support private property rights, please let them.

 

History, anyone?

 

Gun control and healthcare, huh? I notice you didn't mention right to protect yourself or fee market principles because both of those crush your ideals on both the subjects you mentioned. Health care debate is nothing more than rehashed failed ideas from 80 years ago and goes against the economic system that has halfed global poverty since 1980.

 

Have you ever watched Gavin? That dude does nothing but make fun of the thousands of inaccuracies and contradictions amongst various subsets of the leftist agenda. He makes most of his opponents look pretty stupid.

 

Morally superior, lolololololol. Your stealing one man's wealth to pay for another man's health services. That's inherently immoral.

Stupidity of it, you will cost millions of lives globally of you stifle our 50% share of global medical innovation that your other Medicare for all countries gleefully accept for free.

Mortality, lol. Jesus.

 

I never knew so many rightists were against the rights of private businesses to freely associate. How many of you lot supported the christian baker?

Absolute hypocrisy.

 

Your "right to money" does not supersede anothers "right to health and life". Immorality is saying your money is more important.

 

Even here, there are rules. If you refuse to comply, than you just get banned. Rather clear ans simple.
I dunno what the problem is with banning people who spread nazi like ideology.
I dunno why anybody would defend this.

I dunno why you demand that this forum must comply with spreading a hate agenda.

 

I choose C. Your ideas are ignorant and you are confused about morality.

 

It is immoral to confiscate private property to pay for good intentions. You can suppose that someone may benefit, but you still have to engage in an immoral act to pursue that endeavor. That is inherently immoral.