U.S. indictments show technical evidence for Russian hacking accusations

None, it helped your party and party comes before country for you folk

 

Everyone on the left.

 

That's not details

 

Lol ok

The conspirators used the same bitcoin funds to buy a virtual public network account for communications and to lease a server in Malaysia that hosted DCLeaks.com. They used the Malaysian server to log into the Twitter account of the online hacker persona Guccifer 2.0, and the same server was used to register websites used for hacking the Democratic committees, according to the indictment.
O

 

The story was very detailed, but there was no actual evidence linked. Thinking of the type of evidence that would be required to put that story together, I doubt it will ever come to the light of day.

 

Done and done. But there was no evidence in the indictment.

 

The American taxpayers have paid $40 million for this? We know that Russia spies, employs hackers and is heavily involved in cyberwarfare. $40 million for what is public knowledge and has been for at least a decade?What a rip off. Jeez

 

This is pure speculation on your part. Where did this info come from, anonymous sources again?

Sorry but you have to do more to prove your claims these days because your ilk has zero credibilty.

Try again, dear.

 

"Anything Trump did with Russia happened before he was ever a politician"

Why do you make such absurd and blatantly false claims in the face of a mountain of well documented evidence to the contrary?????

Trump's campaign was in regular communication with a host of Russian intelligence operative, oligarchs and cut out all through the campaign. There isn't any doubt about this.

The Russians told the Trump campaign that they had the DNC e-mails months before WikiLeaks revealed the first one. It's likely that they may have told Trump that they could get the Clinton e-mails too.

Michael Cohen had several meetings with friends of Putin and obtained a letter of intent for a Trump Tower Moscow, WHILE TRUMP WAS A CANDIDATE!

Clinton was never allowed anywhere near Putin's inner sanctum. Putin hates Clinton, one of the reasons why the Russians went all in for Trump.

And Trump isn't in the Putin inner circle is. He just thinks he is.

What any of this has to do with communism or Cuba is beyond me.

 

That's funny, Six months ago, you were loudly denying that any of that happened.

 

Once again,you repeat your false claim that there is no proof, and play your usual "anonymous sources" game.

Do any of you Trumpsters actually know what is going on????????

The facts in Mellow's post are PUBIC RECORD, not anonymous sources.

Here, learn something!

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthe...ction=click&module=Intentional&pgtype=Article

 

Nonsense, no one denied Russia's spying, Russia's hacking, Russia's cyberwarfare activities... or Chinese for that matter...or North Korean....or American, or Israelis..... We denied the idiotic liberal/MSM collusion conspiracy.

And now the american taxpayer has paid $40 million and still paying to be told that Russia spies and no Americans have been implicated. Duh

 

How did they link all of this to Russians? Especially how did they get the names of GRU officers?

 

They wanted disruption; they got it. They still thought Hillary would win, and even Rat Face Rosenstein had to concede it HAD NO EFFECT on the ELECTION...so?

Of course, the exposure of Russian intel involvement, FORCES THE QUESTIONS:

1.) WHAT DID OBAMA KNOW, and WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?

2.) WHY DID HE ISSUE A "STAND DOWN" ORDER TO US INTELL?

3.) WHY DID HE DOWNPLAY RUSSIAN MEDDLING TO CONGRESS, UNTIL TRUMP WON???

 

No, they paid her for helping them gain control of 20% of our uranium reserves.

Silly, desperate deflection from the WELL-DOCUMENTED FACTS, duly noted.

What was OBAMA PROMISING "MORE FLEXIBILTIY" AFTER HIS ELECTION ABOUT?

He had ALREADY BENT OVER FOR PUTIN, IN EVERY POSSIBLE WAY...ohh WAIT...the "STAND DOWN" ORDER....Ahhh….

Why is the Grand Buffoon IGNORING THAT, while "questioning" MMA fighters and beauty pageant contestants, in regards to "Russian Meddling" ???

 

Yes, every one of you did.

Trump had denied it, and you parroted it loudly and frequently.
'
You and your ilk refused to admit that you fell for the Russian led fake news websites that you all posted on this forum throughout the 2016 election.

 

The allege, not show. Allegations are not evidence.

 

Explain THIS, then...and how that = "blame Trump" :


The DNC has STILL REFUSED to turn over its server to the US intel services, and:

The Obama team knew that the Russians were meddling


https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/car...-the-russians-were-meddling-varney/vi-AAz1iN9



Obama's team said it had Russian meddling 'under control' until Trump won, says GOP senator


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...nder-control-until-trump-won-says-gop-senator



Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cy...ssian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html


Wow...talk about "COLLUSION"

 

The lefts goal is to control the internet and what is said on the internet.

As far as our globalist friends are concerned the internet is only for Americans and foreigners that agree with them. If our globalist friends obtain power they will destroy the internet as we know it

 

Nobody has disputed the likelihood that Russians (among others) have tried to influence our elections. We've done it to the Russians, too, going back as far as the 1920's, when we and wealthy European capitalists tried to destabilize the communists in the Soviet Union. It's no surprise that the Russians and most of the rest of "the West" have done many kinds of things to influence elections through many years.

BUT, where is the evidence (EVIDENCE) that the Trump Campaign colluded with Russians in order to "hack the election for Trump"?! To this moment, there has been none (NONE) offered to the American public. None. The Mueller 'investigation' has been crawling along for a year and a half. None.

Prediction: in a bald effort to "influence our election", Mueller will issue a theatrical conclusion of his 'investigation' -- mere days before November -- and issue a boatload of 'he said/she said', unsubstantiated, speculative theories, backed up by no EVIDENCE. But it will be more than enough to satisfy Democrats.

Evidence is evidence... everything else is politically-driven bullshit (a staple in the diet of every rabid Democrat).... .

 

Allegations = "guilty" to today's left , when directed at their perceived enemies...while ignoring ACTUAL FACTS incriminating their own.

Stalinism is alive and well.

 

Our leftist friends don't believe in investigating a crime to find who committed it. They believe in investigating a person to find out what kind of crime they may have committed somewhere and punish them for it.

 

Their teacher is proud in hell:

 

It's amazing how much are Russia truther conspiracy friends act like Russians.

 

Who's Guccifer 2.0?
Who owns it, operates it?
What are their addresses?