U.S. indictments show technical evidence for Russian hacking accusations

The conspirators used the same bitcoin funds to buy a virtual public network account for communications and to lease a server in Malaysia that hosted DCLeaks.com. They used the Malaysian server to log into the Twitter account of the online hacker persona Guccifer 2.0, and the same server was used to register websites used for hacking the Democratic committees, according to the indictment.

Did you consider reading the link?

 

He never said it had no effect.

 

You use evidence to prove allegations

The conspirators used the same bitcoin funds to buy a virtual public network account for communications and to lease a server in Malaysia that hosted DCLeaks.com. They used the Malaysian server to log into the Twitter account of the online hacker persona Guccifer 2.0, and the same server was used to register websites used for hacking the Democratic committees, according to the indictment.
O

 

DNC still won't allow US intel to examine its server, huh?

Nothing dubious about that....

 

Trump and his cronies are he perpetrators.

Instead of asking why Obama didn't stop Trump, you should be asking why Trump was playing footsie with Russians all thoughout his campaign and not telling anyone in the FBI or the US government about it (and later lying wholesale about it).

That would have been his duty as a citizen (not just as a candidate). He didn't do it, and all indications are that he isn't going to confront Putin now or do anything about it either. He has never done either.

 

The cold hard fact is that there is a Putin agent in The White House. As surreal and unbelievable as that may seem, it's the truth nevertheless.

 

And no allegations of any kind have been PROVEN...only made.

 

President won’t even talk to them lol

 

No...former Pres. "Uranium One/disarm the Ukraine/renege on European Missile Defense Shield/"more flexibility for Vlad"/ ORDER STAND of US intel to NOT INTERFERE WITH RUSSIAN MEDDLING/" Obama has been gone for a awhile now.

 

Typical Trumpster response. Ignore all the fact that have emerged in the last year and a half and act as though you just woke up this morning after an eighteen month sleep and the only "news" you have are Fox, Brietbart and Gateway Pundit!

There is no shortage of such evidence or documentation. You know it too.

And if Mueller drops the dime on Trump two weeks before the mid terms, it's nothing less than he deserves.

 

Correct! Finally an accurate statement

 

Did they give you the code words in red, or did you do that yourself?

 

So you’re saying Reuters made it up??

 

PUTIN: "Donald, why don't you pass the time by playing a little game of solitaire!"

 

And, as always, you remain TOTALLY INCAPABLE of even ADRESSING, much less REFUTING, a single FACT I posted.




Here...try again...which of these did Obama NOT DO...and provide proof. (As if...) :

No...former Pres. "Uranium One/disarm the Ukraine/renege on European Missile Defense Shield/"more flexibility for Vlad"/ ORDER STAND of US intel to NOT INTERFERE WITH RUSSIAN MEDDLING/" Obama has been gone for a awhile now.


I'll wait here for you concise, verified refutation(s).

 

The part I would dispute from the Reuter's article is this, "...U.S. indictments against a dozen Russian intelligence officers on Friday provided detailed technical evidence to back up allegations of Russian hacking "

Once again (and for like the zillionth time) WHAT EVIDENCE? There was no evidence in the indictment. So unless they are referring to a yet unsealed and not public indictment that actually has evidence, what are they talking about?

So whether Reuters "made it up" or if they, like you, just assumed the indictment was the evidence, that's a pretty good working definition of fake news.

 

The indictment goes into great detail of this stuff. Are you reading the right one??

 

There is more than one?

 

Well the one we’re talking about goes into quite a bit of detail...don’t know youd miss it

 

You have a chance now to distinguish yourself, Tommy, and utterly trounce all of us on the Conservative Right. Please, supply us all with an authoritative source, or a pathway to an authoritative source that will be the AMERICAN PEOPLE this 'proof' that you are talking about.

I thank you in advance, because, as we all know, NOBODY ELSE HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO THIS! Again, THANK YOU!

P. S. Please don't mistake me -- if Donald Trump is proven to have colluded with the Russian government to "hack the election" of 2016, then I would fully agree that he must be impeached, removed from office, drawn, quartered, and have his severed head mounted on a stake! How's that?!

 

I think I've replied to you on this subject on another thread. The indictment is very detailed, and tells a fascinating story, but IT IS NOT EVIDENCE. I think you think that the indictment is the evidence, therefore case closed.

 

And, so, Donald Trump is guilty of having conspired with 'the Russians" to mastermind and implement any or all of these 'Mission Impossible-esque" actions? Holy cow! Maybe Trump isn't quite as stupid as so many of you on the Left think he is....

But, hey, a typical rabid Democrat's idea of an expert computer user is... HILLARY CLINTON!
."Didn't you Democrats know that I have a Ph.D in Hackology?! Just ask Vladimir! He has one, too!"

 

Oh, you party pooper !!

 

No the indictment explains the evidence. Of course the case isn’t closed, but it lays out a compelling case.

 

The Leftist axiom that "allegation = guilty" has been fundamental to their beliefs for hundreds of years -- so long as it can be applied to people they HATE!

Their mantra -- "Who needs EVIDENCE when we're all having so much fun with our righteous HATRED?!"