Ultimate White Power

Ancient DNA study finds Phoenician from Carthage had European ancestry
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-ancient-dna-phoenician-carthage-european.html

White Power just gets more and more ultimate.

 

out of Africa, bro.

 

Given the importance of Africa to studies of human origins and disease susceptibility, detailed characterization of African genetic diversity is needed. The African Genome Variation Project provides a resource with which to design, implement and interpret genomic studies in sub-Saharan Africa and worldwide. The African Genome Variation Project represents dense genotypes from 1,481 individuals and whole-genome sequences from 320 individuals across sub-Saharan Africa. Using this resource, we find novel evidence of complex, regionally distinct hunter-gatherer and Eurasian admixture across sub-Saharan Africa. We identify new loci under selection, including loci related to malaria susceptibility and hypertension. We show that modern imputation panels (sets of reference genotypes from which unobserved or missing genotypes in study sets can be inferred) can identify association signals at highly differentiated loci across populations in sub-Saharan Africa. Using whole-genome sequencing, we demonstrate further improvements in imputation accuracy, strengthening the case for large-scale sequencing efforts of diverse African haplotypes. Finally, we present an efficient genotype array design capturing common genetic variation in Africa.

Link

Gurdasani et al. (2014) is a very important paper as it dispels with one sway four long-standing and hard-working myths, namely that 1) Africa is the most genetically diverse continent; 2) genetic diversity is an indicator of population age; 3) non-African diversity is a subset of African diversity; 4) serial bottlenecks out of Africa are responsible for the observed global patterns of genetic diversity.

http://anthropogenesis.kinshipstudi...ics-or-truth-about-african-genetic-diversity/

Ultimate. White. Power.

 

Why do you spam this sentence everywhere? People explain why in great detail. Flat contradiction isn't refutation.

 

How did they get there? Or, did they evolve separately; as a distinct new species.

 

The theory argues for the African origins of modern humans, who left Africa in a single wave of migration which populated the world, replacing older human species.

A first dispersal took place between 130,000–115,000 years ago via northern Africa, but died out or retreated,[10][11][12][13][14] though Chinese researchers question this extinction and claim the presence of modern humans in China at least 80,000 years ago....snip~

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_African_origin_of_moder n_humans

[video=youtube;Arq-340mIUQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arq-340mIUQ[/video]

Wanderers, huh?

 

Because, you are simply wrong. That is why.

- - - Updated - - -

How did they get there? Or, did they evolve separately; as a distinct new species.

 

no u r

- - - Updated - - -

Africans or Eurasians?

 

no, you are.

We know Man evolved in Africa and then, some did migrate. And, we have a general pattern of such migrations.

Any Humans not out of Africa, would have needed to evolve separately and be a distinct species; as Darwin showed in his travels.

 

The Phoenicians gave us the Alphabet.....Astrology and naturally, Maritime Compass following the Stars.





Although, they did not conquer the seafaring peoples. Who came before them.....Some believe that the Etruscans who taught the Romans everything they know learned from the Sicani out of Sicily and none have been able to find their exact Origin.

 

Were the Phoenicians distinct from more, European tribes?

 

No, they could have gone into Africa. I don't see what your point is though. Let's say the common ancestor of Africans and Eurasians 100000 years ago lived in Africa. So what?

 

before or after, humans migrated out of Africa?

Homo sapiens sapiens would need to be a different sub-species for you to be correct.

 

Race is a manmade construct. Its not real.

And I've seen lots of footage of white neo-nazis who talk about being the superior race. And per the videos I've seen, if that's a sampling of human superiority, we're all in deep, deep trouble.

 

Why is the concept of race important to the sole surviving species in the Homo genus?

 

replacing older human species......snip~

What confuses you with the Out of Africa Theory.....about replacing older human species. Evidently they those older Humans were already there.

 

All unique, and diverse Human races, and cultures deserve to be preserved.

 

Meet Your Ancient Relatives: The Denisovans....

So far, archaeologists have only found a little girl's pinky bone finger and two teeth in a cave in the mountains of Siberia. But researchers are learning a lot about the Denisovans and their relationship to modern humans by analyzing the DNA hidden in those bones. In fact, scientists have been able to sequence that little girl's genome at the same accuracy they can for modern humans today, kind of amazing considering the girl's bones are probably over 50,000 years old. Those results appear this week in the journal Science.....snip~

It's very different from the Neanderthals, who are very well-characterized by the archaeological record. We have many full skeletons and fossils who we know are Neanderthals, and we know the types of tools they made.

But we don't know what types of tools the Denisovans made. The Neanderthals lived in Western Eurasia and in Europe, and the Denisovans seem to have lived in the eastern parts of Eurasia, and we don't have a well-defined group of skeletons or archaeology that we know must have been left behind by a group.

But amazingly, we do have a genome sequence from the Denisovans, and we can use the genome sequence to study how they're related to Neanderthals and modern humans......snip~

http://www.npr.org/2012/08/31/160391676/meet-your-ancient-relatives-the-denisovans

Oh and they didn't come out of Africa Let Darwin know okay.....Imagine that!

 

Not race, but tribe.

- - - Updated - - -

They were not, homo sapiens sapiens.

 

ethnic, religious, national pride is fine.


racial pride is dumb.

 

Some Indians have a genetic diversity higher than Africans apparently.

http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2010/11/some-indians-as-genetically-diverse-as.htm

Maybe this explains why early Eurasians like Kostenki man, Pestera Cu Oase, and Ust'-Ishim had a lot of Indian like DNA, rather than African like DNA.

Maybe this is a smoking gun that Eurasian Cro Magnon man came from India, rather than Africa.

 

Post 44.

Oh and the Chinese dispute man coming out of Africa.


though Chinese researchers question this extinction and claim the presence of modern humans in China at least 80,000 years ago....snip~

 

they did not evolve into humans, there, but in Africa and spread out through the "African Diaspora". What you show is a relative "snapshot" in a given time.

 

The fossil evidence does support it.

The Dali fossil in China 200,000 years ago had traits intermediate between Homo Erectus, and Homo Sapiens.

More remarkable is that the Dali Fossil like other Chinese Homo Erectus had some Mongoloid like features.

 

There is no doubt that the White culture has been superior to other cultures in many significant areas and I tend to believe that climate has a great deal to do with the fashioning of any culture.

Those living in Northern Europe had to plan months in advance in order to survive or they would starve or freeze. Those living in Southern cultures didn't have the same problems. They could pick fruit from the trees or hunt an animal any time of the year. As well the Protestant work ethic had a tremendous effect on the Norther European cultures.

I've spent a great deal of time in Latin America, beginning in the early 90's, and have noticed the change in attitude where they are now planning their lives far more in advance than they once did, and their success when doing so is becoming far more obvious. We live in a culture where people can be looking at a retirement package at 22 years old while for others 'tomorrow' is just a concept.

The world is changing and more people are adapting to the northern European Protestant work ethic, though of course they don't call it that. As they do the world will advance economically, as it has been doing. The only danger to the future is strongly held ideologies which ignore human rights and freedoms.