Ultimate White Power

Oh look, ancient artwork illustrating African racial superiority:

 

Yamna was R1b, Corded Ware was R1a.

 

How does a tomb painting of a brown-skinned Pharaoh slaying jet-black Nubians and a map of the spread of the chariot prove that Whites are racially superior????

 

In a similar fashion, ancient Nubians may have spread to India and as far as East Asia. What's interesting about the two cases is that human genetics can rewrite world history. Eurasian haologroups M and R can be found at a frequency of 10% in Kenya compared to 45% in Ethiopia. M is the single most common mtDNA haplogroup in Asia, which represents on average about 70% of the maternal lineage in Japan. M is also the most common maternal haplogroup for the Dravidians and the Dravidian languages are quite similar to the Japanese language. The Dravidians are thought to have originated in Nubia (Winters 2008 ) and the M people could have spoken the same ancient language for some time before splitting into different language groups. Krishnamurti (2001) outlines the alleged relationship of Dravidian languages to Elamite, Sumerian and Japanese and there is abundant evidence that Dravidian languages are genetically related to the Niger-Congo group. The Proto-Dravidian speakers probably migrated across Arabia to reach India. The first civilization in Arabia was the Tihama culture which originated in Nubia.

 

What does that have to do with anything?

- - - Updated - - -

Nobody really knows what color the Egyptians were.

 

Either there is a common ancestor, or there isn't; in which case, such persons would be a distinct species, not originating from the same conditions that engendered homo sapiens sapiens.

 

By the thread title I thought this was about the Clintons.

 

Yea that's it. The global jewish media conspiracy - its a disaster - believe me.

 

Semites aren't a race. Its a label to identify a "language group" which also includes a variety of ethnicities

- - - Updated - - -

zieg baby zieg.

 

In most of their artwork they depict themselves as brown. Medium-brown or Reddish-brown compared to both darker and lighter-skinned neighbors. So why not give some credit to the Ancient Egyptians for telling us what they looked like through their own art?

[video=youtube;5RAH_a99EhQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RAH_a99EhQ[/video]





Now artwork isn't scientific evidence of anything but it does give us clues. We also have some scientific evidence of the Ancient Egyptians' skin color.

This is consistent with scientific opinion on their skin color.

So my question to any one who questions what the skin color of the Ancient Egyptians was is, what do you make of the artistic and scientific evidence?

 

Cherry picked sources.

 

he said with a straight face.

 

A nonsensical view of history. All of Asia and the Asian subcontinent were centuries ahead of primitive white Europeans in math, the sciences, medicine and much more.

Rather, the fact seems to be whichever area is the wealthiest, most powerful and most stable society over a period of time becomes the most advanced technologically.

 

Couldn't agree more. Much that is found in this thread, unfortunately, seems to be no more than a desperate effort by a couple of people with ordinary minds -- who have probably achieved very little, if anything in life -- to twist, and present, history in a way that will somehow tie themselves to others (in history) who may have achieved much.

From the pretentious: ‘untermenschen’, to the equally silly: ‘zieg baby zieg’, this thread would be more at home with the delusional “thinkers” at stormfront.

 

Egyptians both modern, and ancient clearly looked like Quadroons - Mulattoes.

 

Quite a few sophisticated things came from ancient Europeans including the wheel, chain mail armor, composite bows, chariots, wagons, axles, salt mining, gold mining, metal smelting, the copper age, domesticated Horses, ovens for cooking food, maps, ceramics, woven fabric, proto-writing, and so forth.

 

I'm spotting a few things here that Europeans can't exactly claim exclusive credit for.

 

Which are those?

 

Pretty much all of them, actually. Having trouble pinpointing any of them that weren't also present in Asia.

 

How do you know that these didn't start in Europe, and spread to Asia soon after?

Take the wheel, all 3 of the earliest examples come from Europe, yet we commonly hear it was started in Sumeria.

This seems to be nothing more than anti-White propaganda.

 

How do you know they did? You are the one making the claim, so let's see your proof.

Seems like you are trying to defensively paint any attempt at historical accuracy or any skepticism of your claims as "anti-White." Because why else would anybody suspect that non-whites would have thought of any of this stuff. Sorry, but this sounds like pseudohistory in a lame attempt at White supremacy apologetics.

 

https://mathildasanthropologyblog.w...just-when-was-the-wheel-invented-and-by-whom/

Cucuteni-Trypillian cow-on-wheels, 3950-3650 B.C

https://rafzen.wordpress.com/2011/0...esentation-of-a-wheeled-vehicle-in-the-world/

The oldest well-dated representation of a wheeled vehicle in the world is(*)Polish.
août 25, 2011


The Polish Bronocice pot is a ceramic vase incised with the earliest known image of what may be a wheeled vehicle. It was dated by the radiocarbon method to 3500-3350 BC and is attributed to the Funnelbeaker archaeological culture

http://www.ukom.gov.si/en/media_roo...ulture/worlds_oldest_wheel_found_in_slovenia/

WORLD'S OLDEST WHEEL FOUND IN SLOVENIA
March 2003
World's Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia
(*)
Working on a site in the Ljubljana marshes, Slovenian archaeologists last year uncovered a wooden wheel some 20 kilometres southeast of Ljubljana. Austrian experts have established that the wheel is between 5,100 and 5,350 years old, which makes it the oldest wooden wheel in the world ever found.

 

The linguistic evidence supports a Indo-European origin of the wheel.

This might make sense, because Indo-Europeans became so prominent, and if they had been the first to invent the wheel, it would have given them a huge advantage.


Tomas Gamkrelidze and Vyachislav Ivanov, interestingly enough, have noted that one of our words associated with wheeled vehicles, Proto-Indo-European *kwekwlo bears striking similarity to the words for vehicles in Sumerian gigir, Semitic *galgal, and Kartvelian *grgar. With the putative origin of wheeled vehicles set variously in the Pontic-Caspian, Transcaucasia or to Sumer, we may be witnessing the original word for a wheeled vehicle in four different language families. Furthermore, as the Proto-Indo-European form is built on an Indo-European verbal root *kwel—'to turn, to twist', it is unlikely that the Indo-Europeans borrowed their word from one of the other languages. This need not, of course, indicate that Indo-Europeans invented wheeled vehicles, but it might suggest that they were in some for of contact relation with those Near Eastern languages in the fourth millennium B.C. —James P. Mallory, In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth, Thames and Hudson, 1989, p. 163.

 

Nope. Keita is one of the foremost experts on the subject and Mekota did an objective histological analysis of mummy skin. People call sources cherry-picked when they don't have a rebuttal.

What about the artwork? Are you denying that in the majority of tomb paintings the Ancient Egyptians don't depict themselves as brown-skinned? That is an objective fact.

To me the art looks a lot more similar to Northeast African ethnic groups such as the Somali, Oromo and Nilotic folk who happen to have the same brown skin color. Craniofacial analysis has also confirmed that the Ancient Egyptians were biologically similar to these groups.

 

Modern Egyptians are clearly a nice match for ancient Egyptians.

https://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/upper-egyptians.png