Unarmed Kid Murdered (part 9)

Your hubris is astronomical. He said Reuters INVENTED the term for this story to be used in a criminal context. It is impossible for them to invent a term used in criminal context when that term had already been previously used.

How did Reuters invent it for this story if it was already in use???????

 

Really...lets expand that question a bit...Do you have evidence Reuters KNEW the term had been used before? If you search their site one will only find it is used in this case...

Your arguments rest on absolutes...either the term was never, ever used before or it was in common use and Reuters used it commonly.

I do not believe Reuters coined the phrase, they just used it as code in the PC wars....evil 'white' (shudder) Hispanic 'murders' harmless child...that was their spin and they apparently sold a lot of people.

I believe it simply made actual fact finding and Justice a very remote possibility.

 

lmao the defense of this argument gets dopier and dopier...

so they are calling him hispanic white, to hide that hispanics are white?

the race obsesed come up with the most idiotic conspiracy theories to justify their racial paranoia.

 

agian, then it makes more sense to ignore the fact hes hispanic.

either hispanics already know hes hispanic,.....which wuold mean calling him hispanic serves no purpose

or they dont know....and calling him hispanic white would make them feel persecuted (unlikely, as white victimhood seems to be mostly white nonhispanics)

in every senario this moronic conspiracy makes no sense.

 

You said we couldn't claim he was racist based on calls to the police because we didn't know what all the calls were about. Now that all 46 calls are available you say they don't prove anything. Got hypocrisy?

Having black friends does not prove one is not racist. Racists will often hide behind having black friends but it only means they view their friends as the exception and not the rule. It's obvious you are clueless about what it means to be racist.

When he told neighbors to look out for black males, what was he referencing? Obviously skin color......but keep ignoring the facts.

 

obviously the police listen him as white in order to fan the flames of racial hatred...in fact thats probably why they set him free to begin with!!!+

 

Reuters has been around for 160 years and is one of the largest news companies. You want "proof" they new the term was in use??????

HAHAAHHHAAAA

Beyond pathetic. When proven completely wrong you simply invent new BS questions as distractions.

Even if I wasted the time to show Reuters knew about it you would simply respond by saying:

"They didn't use it often enough and if you prove they did I will respond by saying that doesn't matter because it doesn't explain why milk has often been more expensive than gasoline"

 

Oh no...to provide the proper 'wink, wink' 'nod,nod' so everyone knows how the PC priorities work out...cannot have some poor leftie jumping on the wrong color bandwagon...

 

then they would leave out the hispanic part....

even if your silly PC priority conspiracy was true, it would make no sense to include hispanic if the goal is to demonize whites.

 

I wont dodge it because the answer is NOT KNOWN.

Unlike you who use your own bigotry to fill in the gaps of information, I will not.

LOL You just denied it then declared it in the same sentence. Do you even read what you write?

You have ZERO evidence his reporting of black males is racist. If that is all he saw then it isn't racist because you INFER it is.

Your own racism and bigotry draws baseless conclusions but its not the first time and I'm sure wont be the last.

Because we weren't there. There are no direct witnesses who actually saw the entire thing.

You use your own racism and bigotry to infer racism based on facts you INTERPRET to be racist based on your own opinion. Its beyond stupid and explains a great deal why you are obsessed with this case.

 

LOL You just said they all were not about black men so explain your moronic statement that we know what each one was about.

 

It is known why he highlighted his race after giving it in the description but you want to ignore the obvious reason.

You are obviously having trouble with simple comprehension so let me help you out. Reporting blacks as suspicious is not in itself racist. What we have here is a pattern of reporting ONLY black males as suspicious. Im not sure how to dumb it down even farther for you and the only other way to explain it is to say if he had reported whites and Hispanics along with blacks then it would not prove racism by that alone.

Here is the evidence of his racism:

Telling neighbors to look out specifically for blacks.

Falsely accused a 16 year old black resident LIVING in the gated community of stealing a bike that was never stolen.

His highlighting of Martin's race when it was clearly not needed. In fact, he used Martin's race to emphasize his fear when he said he was coming to check him out.

His pattern of reporting ONLY blacks as suspicious.

I know you will ignore the facts so I only posted this for honest readers.

Your agenda of running away from facts is proven once again because you claimed not having access to his 911 calls meant a pattern could not be proven. Now that his calls have been released you ignore them altogether.

You're in the same camp of the people who falsely claimed Reuters invented "white Hispanic."

Show us another brilliant move of calling me a racist because I used the facts to prove Zimmerman's racism.

 

Then again, it could be because they had a problem with young black men in the neighborhood causing trouble. Of course you know better, you live there.

 

Are you really this freaking thick?????? I said not all calls were about reporting black males because sometimes he called for doors being open or kids playing in the street. You claim my statement about knowing what each one is about is "moronic."

How in the hell can it be moronic when all of his calls to the police were made public a while ago?

Oh, I get it now. You are ignorant of basic facts and didn't know the details of each call are public record.

You say he was justified in telling people to look out for blacks due to crime. Show us how many blacks have been convicted for crimes in his neighborhood in the year preceding his murdering Trayvon.

You really should take this advice: before falsely accusing others of inventing facts or making moronic statements that are actually based on public record, trying learning the basics of the subject you are trying to discuss. Like the others, you will ignore your own screw up and blame someone else.......

 

Then show us how many blacks were convicted of crimes in his neighborhood in the year prior to murdering Trayvon.

 

Not my problem. The problem is you making statements based nothing you know as fact.

 

Police release Zimmerman's account of what occurred from that night.

Read more: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/03/26...of-the-trayvon-martin-shooting/#ixzz1qHte0DQk

I don't expect any of you will defer to my application of logic in the future, but I am curious if you think I am psychic... and while it does not make Zimmerman's statements accurate, it does make you guys look particularly foolish. Zimmerman's story, as I preconceived it, is supported by all of the evidence, which is why he was not arrested.

Ctrl 1
Idiot liberals 0

 

ROTFL!!!!! ROTFL!!!!!

Do you always celebrate mini fantasy victories in your head like this? Trayvon RAN AWAY from Zimmerman when Zimmerman was on the phone with dispatch. So tell us how Trayvon suddenly magically appeared between Zimmerman and his suv??????

Zimmerman's claim is proven COMPLETELY false by the phone records ALONE. Think about it Einstein. He was on the side of the road next to mailboxes when he hung up with dispatch and after already admitting he lost sight of Trayvon. In order for Zimmerman's statement to be correct the fight would had have to happen at hi suv. But it didn't. It happened in between the houses which means Zimmerman never attempted to return to his suv.

But hey, feel free to ignore all of the facts and evidence and take the word of someone who MURDERED an unarmed 17 year old for the crime of walking.

You have a funny way of selecting your heros.....

Just curious, you say All of the evidence supports Zimmerman. What about the evidence a witness heard Zimmerman approach Trayvon? Oh, I forgot, you will take the word of a murderer over a witness if it means pretending you are correct....

 

I'm going to point out again that in the first statement released by the police about Zimmerman, it was stated Zimmerman was returning to his suv and attacked. That was before everyone found out there was a witness on the phone with Trayvon. Suddenly Zimmerman's version is changed to say now they exchanged words before the fight.

It's obvious Zimmerman's account was changed after new evidence was produced and anyone who denies that is simply painfully dishonest and in bed with a murderer.

 

Are you really this blatantly dishonest? Once again:

Here is the evidence of his racism:
Telling neighbors to look out specifically for blacks.

Falsely accused a 16 year old black resident LIVING in the gated community of stealing a bike
that was never stolen.

His highlighting of Martin's race when it was clearly not needed. In fact, he used Martin's race to
emphasize his fear when he said he was coming to check him out.

His pattern of reporting ONLY blacks as suspicious.

You tried to defend him by referencing crime. So the burden of proof is on you. Show us how many blacks were convicted for crimes in his neighborhood in the year prior to his murdering Martin. Just slink away like the others who have been proven wrong then hide........

 

This is really SICK:

"He's gone through a period basically not undifferent (sic) from anybody who's lost an life. I
mean he's lost his," Oliver said.

Trayvon lost his life and Zimmerman's friend wants to claim Zimmerman has lost his????????? This is the kind of IDIOT that is a friend of Zimmerman.

The witness on the phone, and the phone records prove Zimmerman is lying. This also proves Zimmerman knew he was black BEFORE calling the police:

“He said this man was watching him. So, he put his hoodie on…”
She then went on to say Martin was cornered.
“Trayvon said ‘what are you following me for?’ The man said ‘what [are] you doing around here.’”
The girl then said that’s when things took a turn.
“Then somebody pushed Trayvon cause the headset just fell.” She then said the phone line went
dead. Soon after, Zimmerman killed Trayvon.
http://www.cfnews13.com/content/new.../articles/bn9/2012/3/26/trayvon_martin_leake/

 

Only to racists who interpret what he said as negativly as possible.

He also has a black friend who says he and his wife have tutored for free black children in his neighborhood.

But you ignore that real fact..

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8d8_1332814891&comments=1

You can't get past your own racism. Might want to work on that before you "help" anyone else out.

#1 Reporting only suspicious people who happen to be black IS NOT RACIST. You have to INFER the REASON why they were reported and IGNORE the possibility that those blacks were all he recognized as people he didn't know or looked suspicious.

It is a REQUIREMENT to interpret that fact in the worst possible light to make a claim of racism without ANY "pattern" of racism from any other part of his life. It reeks of racism and bigotry.

Not racist if blacks were committing the crimes.

where is your evidence?

Another lie and another interpretation of what actually happened. You have ZERO evidence his intention was racism.

Once again does not prove racism.

LOL You mean honest readers like yourself who can't show ANY pattern of racist statements from his past?

"Honest" readers like yourself who ignore the fact he has a black friend defending him RIGHT NOW on tv and has also said he and his wife have tutored black children for FREE?

See those are actual FACTS not interpretations of comments he made.

You should actually try putting your racism aside for a second and think about it.

I don't run away from facts. I embrace them. What I do not do is use racism to fill in the gaps or interpret facts in the worst possible light because unlike you I don't pretend to know what actually happened.

I also don't ignore the facts about Zimmerman's past or who is defending him, unlike you.

Another lie. I have never once commented on that but the fact you lied about it is certainly not a surprise.

I already have. You use your racism to interpret facts to accuse Zimmerman of racism because of his skin color while ignoring the fact he has a black friend defending him and has testified he helps black children for free in his community.

You are the same person who made one of the most racist comments about Zimmerman when the argument about his race was brought up and you defended calling him white because he "sounded" white. Your racism unlike Zimmerman is well documented.

Its sad to see people so blinded with bigotry and racism who refuse to look at all the facts and have the courage to admit when they don't have all the facts before rendering judgement.

 

What is black and white and stupid all over?

 

Goodness........that was one of the dumbest responses so far. In the face of all the evidence of his racist patterns all you do is stick your fingers in your ears and it does not matter how much evidence is produced, you just flat out ignore it.

Between the two of us, I'm the only one that has addressed all the facts.

You completely ignore the fact you were completely clueless all of his 911 calls are public record and you try to claim crime is the excuse for his pattern of reporting only blacks but like Hoosier, you completely fail to back it up.

 

What is black and white and stupid all over?