Using first and last names to purge voters in November

If it never happened then explain why the best war fighting General America had was fired by Valerie Jarrett ?

I'm just picking just one of the over 200 Generals and flag officers who were fired by the Obama administration for political reasons.

Why was Gen. James Mattis fired ???

When you find out come back and let us know.

 

Boss, let me explain reality for you on this forum okay. Inventing a lie about something I never said, will never improve your position or your parties position and reputation, by planting lies. Lot's of you use this practice here, and it just never works. One lie piled onto another lie will bury you every time.

 

Did you explain this to Hillary ?

 

And there will be five buses of migrant farm workers visiting every polling station to vote democrat with dead people's names and social security numbers.It's not like I haven't seen it done before.Those buses will go to 5 different polling places,and they're given names+ ss#s en route.

 

It's like sexting on the bed like Anthony Weiner with his new baby there. He shouldn't have done it, but he did it anyway. And the Right just cheats anyway, even though they know it is wrong.

If we aren't going to have fair elections, can we just not have them any more?

I mean what's the point, that when a candidate does win, like Barrack Obama, the other side decides to suck on sour grapes and spend the bulk of their time trying to hijack his presidency, instead of doing the work the people hired them to do?

Is it because the people they are working for are no longer working for us? Sure looks that way to me.

 

Your OP clearly made reference to disenfranchisement. Good lord it's worse than I thought, you also dont recognize it in print...when you yourself added it to the conversation.

LOL...and someone else repped you. Too funny!

 

BS.

Start here:
Irving Slosberg, Palm Beach Democrat, not authorized to monitor the election and not a member of the state or county election boards, caught by police during the 2000 Bush-Gore recount with a voting machine in his car.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...5/Democrat-hid-voting-machine-in-his-car.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/18/u...e-representative-elect-turns-over-voting.html

 

That's another Republican lie that has never been proven, and thanks for playing.

You have seen no such thing and you are just lying. If you weren't lying you would have proved what you said at the beginning of your post. But you didn't did you, and you won't. This is so weak and pitiful. Lying and can't prove it to boot. You should be ashamed and embarrassed. What a joke.

 

Maybe I'll take a trip down to their shacks on Election day.I'm sure you'd find some way to deflect even after seeing real pics, though.
How do you think I ever noticed it in the first place,by not going there? Onnnk!
I just happened to be there on election day going to buy a washer.

 

First off, your first link is one about "suspecting" voter fraud. And secondly, thousands and thousands of names were purged by Jeb Bush in the 2000 election, which would have gone to Gore. And third, what does any of that have to do with North Carolina getting caught lying about the 35,000 people registering twice who didn't?

 

See what I mean? You're a liar. You've proven nothing. You're all mouth and hate. And that's why your party is going to lose in November. So, it looks like your crowd will get to suck on a few more sour grapes for the next four years. Have a nice life meditating about how all the lies didn't help you a bit.

If "real" pictures existed of "real" illegals on a bus going to the voting booths, you would have already posted them. Oh wait, are you going to photo shop one for us? Lol! That'll be the next lie you'll pedal now.

Boss, give it a rest. You just aren't that good of a liar. If you were, you wouldn't have gotten caught.

 

Document your claim. A non sequiter about Wasserman Schultz does not qualify.

Primary elections are not elections for public office.

 

I'm calling the news station right now.I'll have them document it.Maybe even stop it.

 

Bud, you're just a waste of time. Half of what you say no one understands, and you still can't engage the facts of the OP I presented. So, beyond trolling and saying absolutely nothing, is this the only hobby you have?

- - - Updated - - -

The lies you told me? Thanks!

 

Didn't read dumb, hyperbolic thread.

1. People move.
2. People die.
3. People have more than one residence...

4. Secretaries of State in every single state in the union, red, blue, whatever, have a STATUTORY DUTY TO PURGE INELIGIBLE VOTERS OFF THE STATE'S VOTING ROLLS. If they do not do that, they are at best grossly incompetent, and at worst, breaking the law.

Are the LW propagandists and voter suppression lie narrators going to -ever- admit that absolutely -necessary- context? Of course not, it spoils their transparently inane narrative peddled to their low common denominator voters.

Did they fool you? Want to buy a bridge?

 

Folks, just like clock work, this thread has liven up to its expectations. It's a thread about exposing the lies, deceit, and corruption associated with cheating people out of their legal right to vote come November, and the thread has been an overwhelming success. No one from the Right side of the the aisle has come even close to a coherent counter argument. Only distractions of off topic rants and subjects that have little to nothing to do with the OP.

 

Slosberg was caught with a voting machine in his car, during the recount. He had no business having a voting machine. The Democrat supervisor of elections did not investigate or prosecute. Clearly fraud.

 

In order for a counterargument to be required, there has to be an argument to start with. You didn't, and haven't, posted anything resembling a reasoned adult argument with indicia of adult discussions (why does this not surprise me?) You have made 0 supported or substantiated claims of fact. Here, I'll help:

1. As we all know SOSs in the various states must purge voter rolls as part of their -statutory duties- as SOS. This is generally accomplished in accordance with rules made by the state's board of elections or equivalent that guide the SOS in this mandatory duty.

2. In light of "1" above, I believe the specific policy "A" of purging the voter rolls in the state of XYZ, as reflected in the following XYZ election board rules goes too far, and is unduly restrictive due to bla, bladebla and blabla.

3. This kind of purging has -denied- voters the right to vote in the following jurisdictions and numbers... 1,2,3.

That's the framework of an adult argument on this particular topic. It is honest, deals with necessary context, and doesn't look like a pile of partisan garbage poo the way your OP does.

Emotional spew + lazily linking a Rolling Stone (lol) article does not an argument make.

...and another thing the LW lie narrators don't want you to know is that almost no one is ever turned away from polls outright and denied voting, they are instead allowed to vote provisionally, and are allowed time to clear up whatever problems exist with their registration. This is true in even the most stringent picture ID states in the country. Just another way they try to fool you into believing people are being turned away from the polls when they are not.

Did they fool you? Want to buy a bridge?

 

People also make (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) statements not knowing the difference between lying and cheating others out of their right to vote based on people registering to vote twice when they haven't, while thinking this is all about a bridge, should be purged from participating in an intelligent discussion.

You know Vern, if they are selling bridges, you know something isn't quite right there.

 

Well, well...Apparently the Democrats are really butt hurt that the Republicans might use the SAME TACTICS as they themselves due every election season. Poor little libbies....Karma can really be a bytch.

 

Of which it was proven a fabrication on its face, based on the fact there were no convictions of the 35,000 who the official said "she knew" they registered twice. So no, my article proved with 100% accuracy that this woman was not doing her job. She lied and she was caught. These folks purged these voters based on first and last names being the same, but the middle name was different. So John Doe with a middle name of Jackson, got purged if John Doe in another state showed up with a middle name of Jones. 29 Republican Governors have over seven million voters under scrutiny as we speak, of which most are minority voters. So no, you are 100% wrong, and I proved it.

Hmm, and yet, you didn't read the OP. Interesting!

We'll, that's mighty generous of you to enlighten us about the reasoning behind all this. The word "adult"! You see, that's the fundamental problem. The Republican party and its election officials along with their prospective henchmen, are not adults. This immature collection of scalawags calling themselves Republicans/ election chief officials are nothing more than kids in a candy store making sure the minority kids don't get any of the candy. Hence, 35,000 of them to be precise, in one state.

I noticed you seem to be void of one that counters Rolling Stone? Of course, when have I ever seen you counter one with another link of your own anyway? Beyond your delightful condescending collection of gobbly goo, you never produce much of anything else. No surprises there!

Oh really? Gosh, I wonder why the good folks from Florida didn't know that from the Bush/ Gore election when tens of thousands were purged by Jeb Bush? Lol! This is the kind of horse dung that keeps on giving right?

Ha, we are sending you help okay; https://www.google.com/search?q=ima...UKEwjNv8LCuOfOAhWCMx4KHRzQCZcQsAQIGw&dpr=0.75

 

Name them all. And proof they were "fired."

BTW, you simply proved my point....you don't "love the military". You love RIGHTWINGERS who are in the military.

 

Actually, he just made it up.

 

You didn't make your case and haven't yet. Sorry bout that.

 

Again, what does that have to do with my OP? Exactly, nothing at all. If all you have to offer is a diversion, then get out of my kitchen. No one wants to continually sanitize a kitchen, every time you try and dirty it up, with a guy in a car and a voting machine.

If you want to debate the actual subject I am addressing, go clean your act up and bring something to the table that actually challenges my OP. Otherwise, stay out of the kitchen.

You're just like some of these others who come on here just to make fools of themselves. They're not saying anything.

- - - Updated - - -

Ultimate fail for you. Enough said! Thanks for the confirmation.

- - - Updated - - -

These folks are dropping like flies. It's almost like baiting without a hook.