Using first and last names to purge voters in November

You claimed there was no fraud until Republicans got involved with validating voter registration rolls.

I just proved you lied.

 

Is there something about logical deductive reasoning that you have a personal problem understanding? Are you even aware of the fact, that voter ID fraud from an individual, that by the way, just so we get this straight, is almost nonexistent, has nothing to do with voter ID fraud that originates from Republican states, that purges voters who have the same first and last name, despite the fact that those two voters have a different middle name? Is there something associated with reasoning that you don't understand about what I just explained?

 

Excerpts:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/23/military-sources-obama-administration-purging-commanders/

Obama vs. the Generals -> http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/11/obama-vs-the-generals-099379

 

Two Rightwing websites CLAIMING those officers were "fired by Obama".


Click on the "Air Force Times" link.....it doesn't work. Funny that????

 

You claimed no voter fraud existed until recently when Republicans wanted to improve the integrity of the vote.

I showed Democrats were involved in fraud in the 2000 Bush-Gore recount,

I just proved you lied.

 

Lol perfect response. Yea my grandpa's name was Tommatthias Tomas which became Tommathew Thomas. Guarantee one's more popular of a name than the other.

 

From a standpoint of logic, how do you improve the integrity of the vote when you purge 35,000 voters for bogus reasons?

What? Lied about what? There was a purging by Jeb Bush in the 2000 election that changed the outcome of the election. What does that have to do with lying? You aren't making much sense.

 

Valerie Jarrett is at it again.

First the Obama White House went after "Stripes" then they went after "Military Times."

 

You are claiming without any basis that that people are being purged for bogus reasons.

I don't believe for one second that voters are being removed simply based on first/last name comparisons with other states voter rolls. That's pure BS, and since your "proof" is from MSNBC its double BS.

When voter rolls are checked, the rolls are scanned for possible errors such as an old registration with no activity for many years, someone who does not correlate with utility records, the person does not show up in the DMV (drivers license) records. For those people, typically cards are mailed to the person at the address on record. If there is no response, a second card is mailed. Up to this point its all computerized and easy to do. If there is no response to the second card, then typically a person steps in and tries to contact the person. At that point, a registration can be dropped from the roll.

And IF they are dropped, then there is recourse for the next election if a mistake was made and that person shows up at the polls.

Your entire OP is total BS.

 

I rest my case. You believing one thing, is nothing more than the ultimate fail as a counter argument. Telling me my argument is bs, is nothing more than admitting you have no counter argument or facts to dispute the claim. You can look it up yourself, but you won't because the only truth there, is the one I presented. There were 35,000 voters in North Carolina taken off the voter roles because of the scam that was concocted by the name difference. If you have no counter facts that dispute mine, then your own argument is worth squat. So, if it's bs big boy, then prove it, or stop coming on here and making a total fool of yourself telling us nothing.

Oh look, Town Hall is talking about it too; http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...assive-voter-fraud-in-north-carolina-n1818137 So, I guess that is bs too right? Lol! I'll be waiting for that counter argument there hot shot.

 

This isnt voter fraud.......its ELECTION fraud !

 

WOW YOU FAIL FAIL FAIL!!!

You did not read your own link!!!

It does not state that 35,000 voters were removed from voter rolls. It states:

"A report presented Wednesday by Elections Director Kim Strach to the Joint Legislative Elections Oversight Committee said 81 voters have a voter history later than the date of their death. The audit further identified 13,416 deceased voters on voter rolls in Oct. 13. The audit showed 155,692 registered North Carolina voters whose first and last names, dates of birth and last four digits of their Social Security number match those of voters registered in other states, but who most recently registered or voted elsewhere. A total of 35,750 voters with matching first and last names and date of birth were registered in North Carolina and another state, and voted in both states in the 2012 general election. Another 765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, date of birth and last four digits of their Social Security number were registered and voted in the 2012 general election in North Carolina and another state"​

And from this http://www.newsmax.com/US/Carolina-voter-fraud-zombies/2014/04/03/id/563542/

"Elections Director Kim Strach told the oversight committee, "Could it be voter fraud? Sure, it could be voter fraud. Could it be an error on the part of a precinct person choosing the wrong person's name in the first place? It could be. We're looking at each of these individual cases."​

Nobody was removed from the rolls at the time of the articles, and each case was being individually checked.

Thanks for the link, you proved yourself a fraud.